Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

no rb30 I have every seen has oil squirters! Thats about 32-35 at last count I have 9 in the shed and none of them have them.

A 26 head is a far better choice you will find the 25 cam, and valve choice limiting to the power figure you are hoping to achieve.

A well prepped standard crank should be okay, just be sure to run a good dampner, and a really good quality clutch that is balancd also. Also balance each rod and piston assembly.

Also consider an Autronic if you are willing to rewire the car ecu from scratch you have as good results as MOTEC and if its not a dedicated race car alot of the Motecs systems are wasted on you, so for half the price the Autronic might be an option.

I would budget $8K for a bottom end

I would budget $5-6K for head work and plenum not including the purchase of the head

About $5k for the driveline, mechanical diff, gearbox rebuild and good clutch, and tailshaft service.

I would then budget 5k for miscelaneous like fuel system, ecu, ignition, wring etc.

So yeah its expensive for that much power, if you have more questions fire away.

I know sydneykid has a few tips he just wants to tell us 

You rang :P:)

1. Why the HELL would you use an RB25 cylinder head? :lol:

The RB26 head WILL cost less when you include ALL the necessary parts. Think about inlet manifold, plenum, exhaust manifold, camshafts, solid lifters, valve springs etc etc. Aftermarket RB26 parts are far more common, more choices, cost less new and are plentiful used.

2. I have never ever seen an RB30 with oil squirters standard, and I have disassembled over 30 of them myself, Commondoor, turbo and N/A, series 1 and series 2, Skyline, Patrol and Nissan forklift. Maybe I have just been unlucky :D

3. Standard RB30 crank is OK, I have seen 925 bhp on the engine dyno. But there are lots of tricks to get it to live at the necessary rpm. Tricks I am sure the RAAF doesn't know :lol:

4. If you are not going to circuit race this engine regularly then why the HELL would you use an N1 water pump? They are designed to avoid cavitation at sustained high rpm, on the road they are useless. A standard R33 GTR water pump is the go with a 50 mm PWR radiator.

5. I sure as HELL wouldn't be using a wide flange drive N1 oil pump on an narrow flange RB30 crank without an adaptor collar (ProEngines have them).

6. Forget about using the standard RB25 box, it MIGHT hold the torque. But the ratios are all wrong for that sort of engine, it WILL drop off boost on gearchanges without a close ratio gearset. :(

7. Almost NOTHING in the drive train will handle the torque, everything wil have to be upgraded. That includes the tailshaft, universals, diff, drive shafts, uprights, rear cradle etc. :D

8. I have been looking at the T04Z for circuit work for some time. But the average power over the rpm range we need looks like being less than the ITS66 we currently use, so it would be slower. Until I get a compressor map for a T04Z I don't think I will be risking it.

9. I most definitely wouldn't be using an R33 chassis for this, the R32 chassis is much lighter and leaves more of the budget to be spent on the go faster and/or round corners stuff. :D

10. At that sort of power and rpm don't forget to factor in a full engine service (rings, bearings etc) around once per year.

11. Based on my experience, whatever the engine costs, double it for the rest of the modifications required to handle that sort of power.

:) cheers :)

PS: Last year we built 5 engines similar to what you are describing, the bill for each was $18K plus turbo, injectors and exhaust manifold.

Edited by Sydneykid
Gary how is that rb30 GTR engine going that MIlton sent to the UK going??? IS it up and running yet??? IT should have around this type of power

Nope, they are still building the chassis. There will be two more running locally before that one.

:D cheers ;)

  • 2 weeks later...

why is a n1 more reliable mate??? Just cause its a thicker casting doesnt make the engien more reliable!!! Put it this way I have never had any rb30 split a bore or do any damage to the block itself, and I have never heard of it that was a direct reult of soemthing else being wrong ie. it threw a rod or the tuning was wrong!!! A 2.6 litre for $12K if thats the way you would go then I think your crazy but that just me and I am on the other side of the coin to you I guess???

why is a n1 more reliable mate??? Just cause its a thicker casting doesnt make the engien more reliable!!! Put it this way I have never had any rb30 split a bore or do any damage to the block itself, and I have never heard of it that was a direct result of soemthing else being wrong ie. it threw a rod or the tuning was wrong!!! A 2.6 litre for $12K if thats the way you would go then I think your crazy but that just me and I am on the other side of the coin to you I guess???

why is a n1 more reliable mate??? Just cause its a thicker casting doesnt make the engien more reliable!!! Put it this way I have never had any rb30 split a bore or do any damage to the block itself, and I have never heard of it that was a direct reult of soemthing else being wrong ie. it threw a rod or the tuning was wrong!!! A 2.6 litre for $12K if thats the way you would go then I think your crazy but that just me and I am on the other side of the coin to you I guess???

I didn't mean its more reliable, I put that the wrong way what I shouldve said that if its going to end up costing close to $25k to get RB30 right and the mods to let the rest of the car handle the power then why not just spend just over half that on the 26 ans still have a f***ing fast car, unless your going to drag it who needs that much power youd want own a buerepairs franchise to keep fitting tyres!

N1 block is not thicker its very much lighter than the standard block.

N1 blocks running over 650hp crack a lot sooner than standard blocks.

I have cracked N1 blocks at work.

Fair enough i just thought from what Id read about the N1 R34 GTR that it was a f***ing nice engine point taken :P

I think he means the price of the setup i'm going for.

Also why the hell would you spend $12 800 on an N1 engine when u have to spend all the rest on it to bring it up to the level of performance i want? That's just a waste of money. Not to mention the wast of an n1 bottom end. ;)

I think he means the price of the setup i'm going for.

Also why the hell would you spend $12 800 on an N1 engine when u have to spend all the rest on it to bring it up to the level of performance i want? That's just a waste of money. Not to mention the wast of an n1 bottom end. :D

What setup you going to run?

ok i have a few questions here i am lookin at doin the same 2 my engine, i have the r31, rb30 engine ok, is it possible 2 say 300rwkw with lpg if ne of u no some1 whos done it let me as i have seen a vn i think it was put that much out with lpg and also would it b better 4 me 2 just save my pennys and buy a r32 with the rb30det and go from there im just lookin in2 it atm ive been told many different things about this setup and i would like them clarrified, so if u can provied more information then whats in this thread so far that would b great pm me if u want 2 thanks : :D

  • 1 year later...

has anybody done this conversion with the rb25det head? if so i need help with it wat is needed for the prep of the block for it to go on and run properly and with the vct how will that work on the 30 block? if any body can help it would be greatly appreciated....thankx in advance please pm me or email me at [email protected]

Edited by TonyRB25

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...