Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone!

Today, in deep conversation about GTR performance with one of my friends the topic of thermo fans came up. I was under the impression that thermo fans were far better than using the standard radiator fans. The justification of this opinion was the fact that using the standard fan sapped a bit of power (how much KW loss I am unsure).

My question to everyone out there is; Are thermo fans a worthwhile upgrade? Or will the standard fan suffice?

Those of you who are running thermo fans I would like to hear your opinions.

Thanking everyone in advance.

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

My experience is you probably need to do a lot of extra engineering to block off all routes except through the radiator for the cooling air.

In my experience, the risk of overheating / cooking the engine is not worth the couple of extra kW you gain.

I use 2 14" davies craig thermo fans, its a tight fit. I havent made a shroud of anything for them yet but even under hard driving the temp only goes up a degree or two. On hot days stuck in traffic the temp gauge doesnt move.

My experience is you probably need to do a lot of extra engineering to block off all routes except through the radiator for the cooling air.

In my experience, the risk of overheating / cooking the engine is not worth the couple of extra kW you gain.

But in terms of efficiency, isn't the fan of minimal use when travelling faster than 60km/h?

Also, what about all the FWD cars that run electric fans from factory?

Cheers

like above, fans are used the most when sitting in traffic. They only really shine, when its 30+deg and you arnt moving.

Hell my old '79 holden used to love driving on the highway (cold temps), but go through Maccas on a hot day and it would shoot up temps :)

Thermos NEED a shroud to pull air through like the std setup, or they arnt worth much imho. Ive seen it on heaps of cars now with themos that cant keep the car cold on stop start traffic.

But in terms of efficiency, isn't the fan of minimal use when travelling faster than 60km/h?
Not arguing that. Just you need to ensure that air goes through the radiator, not out under the car. When I had a 16" DC thermo, I could get the fan to switch on on a slight uphill on the highway on a 23 C day.

The engine had seriously overheated during a track day at Winton (25 C) - within 1 lap the temp gauge was off the scale. I replaced the factory fan, and left the tell-tale light in place - 4 laps of QR (30 C) and the tell-tale lit up on the last run into the finish line.

Figured my engine wasn't worth that much risk.

Also, what about all the FWD cars that run electric fans from factory?

Cheers

That's because the engine is parallel to the radiator - the front of the engine isn't facing the radiator for a mechanical fan to work!!
That's because the engine is parallel to the radiator - the front of the engine isn't facing the radiator for a mechanical fan to work!!

Sorry, I wasn't clear with that one...

what I was getting at was, if the rad fans are shrouded correctly, elect thermos are surely as effective as mech ones...?

I have used a single 16 inch davies craig fan on the GTR. Unfortunately they draw an enourmous amount of current so you must rig them up to a thermo switch otherwise you lose the power benifit if they are on all the time. They also work within the factory shroud and reduce rotational mass to boot.

So how much is it to have a new shroud made up for the twins.Or any of the thermo fans??

The car wont overheat.If anything the fans should be set up right in the first place.Like having a thermo switch kick the fans on at optimal temp.

Question!

How much leeway should be taken into account when trying to get the engine to stay at a set goal temp.Like when should they start/kick in to be able to hold 76deg/c?

I run twin thermo's on an SR20DE+T. Since my GTR died, due to heat, I have been worried about temp.

Even with a hi-comp engine, running boost, in a drift car, so has seen a bit of stick, the thermo's are amazing.

When having the car tuned, the tuner was amazed he could not get the car over 80degrees. Hot days are not a problem and even sitting in traffic, I rarely see 75.

Also, they help cool the engine AFTER I turn the car off which I like.

I'm a big fan.... kehehe, I'm funny...

thermo fans are by far a better way to go.....its just that 90% of the setups i have seen people seem to hook them up incorrectly (hotwiring them ect)generally they pull 10amps a peice and north south oem applications????at a split second thought ford falcons,commodores have had them for years.....if i had another 10 minutes think i could think of quite a few more id reckon

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
×
×
  • Create New...