Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

kinda off topic, but what I'd really like to see (well more so HEAR) is an RB31 hi compression in NA form using the 6 throttles with trumpets on them, with a hi flowing exhaust.

sure might not make the power of the turbo ones, but it would sound awesome.

even more off topic, anyone got that video clip of the original race GTR which they pulled out for a few laps of some jap circuit that was being renovated or something..

awesom sound...

As for talk about RB30s beign truck engines, its kinda funny. You look at M3s, some of the greatest 6 cylinder engiens gettign aroubnd, you read the reviews of its revvy nature etc...yet ppl seem to think dynamically the RB30 cant rev ????

yes but spend m3 engine $ on an rb30 and the rpm outcome might be impressive. not the same of course because bmw are vv smart, but impressive nonetheless.

yes but spend m3 engine $ on an rb30 and the rpm outcome might be impressive. not the same of course because bmw are vv smart, but impressive nonetheless.

Sorry, I wasn’t being very clear with my post. Basically the RB30 has an 86 x 86 bore and stroke. And people say that the long stroke etc amongst other things means it wont rev hard. But you look at the latest M# which is generally considered to be a banshee and revs happily and it has an 87mm bore and 91mm stroke. So it actually has a longer stroke then the RB30 which invariably means higher piston speeds etc etc.

So dynamically there is no reason why an RB30 cant rev hard. Ok, fair enough cams may hurt power up top unless something has been done in this area, but if the rods a re good quality and balanced well,, ditto the pistons, especially with a turbo on the side of the thing it should happily pull good revs.

This talk of balancing etc.. I hear that some guys here are using old 270 000km bottom ends..doesn't sound like they care too much about balancing.

For a street car looking at 240-260rwkw - would you just buy a RB30 bottom end - if the pistons look ok just put new rings on and new big end bearings? Rehone it..

Would you really need to balance? Only plan to rev it to 6500rpm

Just going to be putting a lot of kays up on the car for new job so thinking of building a spare bottom end for if and when it needs a freshen up..

Also what turbo - GCG standard highflow...Would this not choke it up high..?

Sorry to deviate a bit.

yeah i think the hiflow is too small for the rb30det

i think the gt30 is the smallest you can run that wont run out of puff

and even that is still a bit too small, i think the gt30r or gt35r is spot on

This talk of balancing etc.. I hear that some guys here are using old 270 000km bottom ends..doesn't sound like they care too much about balancing.

For a street car looking at 240-260rwkw - would you just buy a RB30 bottom end - if the pistons look ok just put new rings on and new big end bearings? Rehone it..

Would you really need to balance? Only plan to rev it to 6500rpm

Just going to be putting a lot of kays up on the car for new job so thinking of building a spare bottom end for if and when it needs a freshen up..

Also what turbo - GCG standard highflow...Would this not choke it up high..?

Sorry to deviate a bit.

would you just use the RB25 to make that kind of power rather than go to all the hassles of building the rb30 and swapping the engine, blue slip with new engine etc?

easy make 260-270 rwkw with std rb25..

personal choice for sure. then again, you might be in an r32 for all i know lol so then i would do it :whoops:

would you just use the RB25 to make that kind of power rather than go to all the hassles of building the rb30 and swapping the engine, blue slip with new engine etc?

easy make 260-270 rwkw with std rb25..

personal choice for sure. then again, you might be in an r32 for all i know lol so then i would do it :whoops:

An RB30 with 260rwkw makes alot more torque than a RB25 with 260rwkw, some people swap to the RB30 because of the better drivability, and lots of extra torque.

An RB30 with 260rwkw makes alot more torque than a RB25 with 260rwkw, some people swap to the RB30 because of the better drivability, and lots of extra torque.

fair call!

anyone noticed any increase i fuel consumption with the lower powered (220rwkw etc) RB30's V's RB20 or RB25's?

Well I'm also considering the cheaper option...It's only if my motor bombs out..

If I have a 3L bottom end with a freshen up there it is cheaper than an imported RB25 engine.

Anyone have any comments on my questions above? Maybe I should make a new post or something..

fair call!

anyone noticed any increase i fuel consumption with the lower powered (220rwkw etc) RB30's V's RB20 or RB25's?

Im getting around 10L/100Km atm out of an untuned pfc.

I cant run it up on boost, due to the coil packs wont take it (break down and piung like a bitch)

Its makes hella fuel economy as everyday driving is under 3500 rpm.

Im getting around 10L/100Km atm out of an untuned pfc.

I cant run it up on boost, due to the coil packs wont take it (break down and piung like a bitch)

Its makes hella fuel economy as everyday driving is under 3500 rpm.

hmm thats what i used to get out of the std RB25.. will have to see. looks like there isn't much difference between the rb30 vs rb25 etc..

get a nice tune and that should improve i'd be thinking!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have been being VERY quiet about what you're alluding to, as it is something that ticks me off... The number of cars from factory that run coil overs is HUGE! Most of them these days do... The other part that annoys me, is people saying "Well all the incabin adjustable suspension is illegal by blah blah blah"... If that's the case, then why can I buy a car brand new that can do it if, FULL STOP in cabin adjustable suspension is illegal...   Also, I could just chuck some aftermarket shocks in my car, throw the stock springs on, after my blue slip, dump my super low springs back in. Same shock and spring style setup... Hell, they could also be the same colour springs etc.     I'm voting, BlueSlipper didn't want to touch the above car for some reason. Whether it be some sort of bias against the car, the owner, them maybe having previously done dodgy shit and now they're being super careful in case they get slapped in the face by the Gumbyment again... Find a new blueslip place.   And can confirm as you had said, yes there are holy bibles of vehicle heights, and all sorts of other suspension stuff. Heck your run of the mill mechanic, and tyre shop has access to all of that stuff. It's how they do wheel alignments...
    • Funny story Heading to Sydney this morning on the HWY there was some slow traffic, so I gave it the beans and midway through my overtaking "power run" I lost all power It seems that I missed a hose clamp,  and the MAF and filter went WiFi To make this more problematic, the little tool kit that lives in the boot, is sitting in the sun room at Goulburn......LOL Luckily for me I found a bit of steel on the side of the road that could be used like a rusty and bent flat head screw driver to tighten it up enough that it got me into Sydney, it is now all tight like a tiger with the aid of a 8mm socket Note to self: Use my brain and double check stuff, and always keep that little tool kit in the car for when I have a brain fart
    • Oh, and as for everyone with their fuel economy changes, I switch between E10 and 98 in the company car. Even do when I had personal cars that could run on E10. You know what changed my fuel economy in any noticeable way? How I drove, and where I drove. Otherwise, say on full tanks of just back and forth from work only (So same trips, same sort of traffic), couldn't notice a difference that I can correlate to the type of fuel in use. In the current vehicle, that's over 42L of USABLE fuel. While 98 is all "more energy dense", it also has higher knock resistance as it takes more energy to get it to ignite too. The longer hydrocarbons, typically more tightly bound. So running the same ignition map, can also produce less power, if there isn't enough time to get it all burnt through properly, as yep, the flame propagation speed is different from lower octane fuel to higher (Higher has a lower flame propagation, due to the more tightly bound and harder to self ignite funs. This is also typically where, a vehicle that is designed purely to run on 91 (Whether it be E10 or normal 91) usually sees absolutely no real world difference in fuel economy for the normal man, woman, or dog.
    • We've got some servos around me that have 91 with E10, 91 (no E10), 95, and 98. At those stations the change from 91 E10 to 91, is typically around 8c/L.   But lets not get started on the price of fuel in Oz. It's ridiculous. All the service stations around me, bar one, the price of fuel has been over the $2 mark per litre for the cheapest, 98 being around $2.45. That one service station is a CostCo, fuel from it comes from the same refineries, and makes no pitstops, it runs great, including the 98. In fact, I've had no issues on CostCo fuel, but plenty of issues at other stations!. The CostCo fuel, was $1.65 roughly this week for 94 with E10. $1.88 for 98. Servos directly across from it, $2.10 for 91 E10, and $2.48 for 98. The part I had to laugh at? If I drive multiple HOURS away from Brisbane, say out near Nanango, or Kingaroy, or even out to Goondiwindi, the price of their fuel, is the same as what it is at the CostCo... Oh, and that BP servo at Goondiwindi is HUGE and goes through epic turnover of fuel, so it's not sitting there for weeks going to shit. And what blows me away, my mate is one of the people who drives the Fuel Tanker all around QLD, delivering to all those places. At the same company his previous role was doing the "local haul" deliveries... Same truck, same driver, same pickup point it all comes from. So you tell me, how the hell it is 60c/L CHEAPER for fuel, when nearly all else is equal, except they require a B-Double to drive half a day out of Brisbane, and half a day back, every second day, compared to the delivery that can be under 30 minutes drive from the fuel pickup point... Not to mention, go five blocks down the road, and Ampol to Ampol will vary 30c/L... And I've had this conversation with my mate... The way it's priced, is just typical, pure and utter rubbish... He also does runs from Brisbane, to all over QLD, down to Newcastle, Sydney, Nowra, Melbourne, Geelong, and even out to parts of the NT depending on the companies needs. His main stuff is all the longer distance away from home for a few days at a time, then when he's back, he loves to just pickup extra shifts wherever he can in whichever truck, hence all the weird different places.   Oh, as for getting E10 into all the fuels in Australia... It was very quickly highlighted, that we don't have enough biomass available to use to make E10 sustainably like they require, and it would dramatically cut into our, and the worlds food chain supply...   I vote we all just start running on liquid methane gas... Plenty of that just getting tapped off at tips from underground decay... (Note, this is pure just stupid commenting. I could very easily highlight the reasons its not a good idea especially on scale...)
    • Am I correct in assuming that the R35's are getting the classic skyline haircut off the odometer?  Quick search on carsales, there are 33 08 and 09 GTR's for sale, only 2 of them have more then 100,000km's on them (116,075 and 110,000 respectively).  And somehow there are about 25 for sale with around 60,000kms? Looks like the classic skyline haircut to me =/
×
×
  • Create New...