Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

cheers mate for the support, ive been reading on the net in general about the turbo bags and especially on the aus rx7 forums they have about 5 of them saying they have had manifolds cracking within 6 months and other probs, etc and thats shop owners saying that not just normal users. they all highly reccomend to keep the heat off everything else by using metal shields on the bits u want cool, not on the turbo itself.

interesting reading on some other forums...

cheers

Brad

now thats thinkin, good luck and pls keep us posted on you results as i am soon to be in the same boat.

cheers,

ryan

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

cheers mate for the support, ive been reading on the net in general about the turbo bags and especially on the aus rx7 forums they have about 5 of them saying they have had manifolds cracking within 6 months and other probs, etc and thats shop owners saying that not just normal users. they all highly reccomend to keep the heat off everything else by using metal shields on the bits u want cool, not on the turbo itself.

interesting reading on some other forums...

cheers

Brad

Meh rotors, look at them the wrong way and they break :)

I have had no trouble with mine in 3 years of use, with track work also.

Meh rotors, look at them the wrong way and they break :)

I have had no trouble with mine in 3 years of use, with track work also.

Yeh, thats a good point...but you dont drive your car that aften do you...woudlnt it be lucky to do 500kms a month? So just tryign to get as better idea of how many kms / heat cyles yours has seen.

I doubt it really matters, but your car isnt exactly a 500-800km pre week car :)

Ive got a new high mount and turbo etc etc. And I decided to get a new bonnet made up for heat reasons. So I bought a second SII skyline bonnet and I'm putting the Ford BA lump in the middle of it (Yes I said Ford) but at the front I'm going to have it sit up by 25mm so I have a scoop at the front and then divert it over to the turbo some how (I haven't worked that one out just yet) and at the rear have it sit up by 30mm across the back to get rid of the hot air. Ill post some pics up when I have it fiberglassed on there to give you an idea.

Yeh, thats a good point...but you dont drive your car that aften do you...woudlnt it be lucky to do 500kms a month? So just tryign to get as better idea of how many kms / heat cyles yours has seen.

I doubt it really matters, but your car isnt exactly a 500-800km pre week car :)

Used to drive it to work everyday from narre to hawthorn, but thats in peak hour traffic and there is no where really to give it some on the way to and from work.

In the last few months the car is lucky if it even gets started once a week :)

on the aus rx7 forums they have about 5 of them saying they have had manifolds cracking within 6 months and other probs

Not to be argumentative, but are we talking stock manifolds or aftermarket? I'm sure we've all heard of the issues with those Ebay manifolds cracking... Also, do you know where on the manifold the cracking occurs?

Not to be argumentative, but are we talking stock manifolds or aftermarket? I'm sure we've all heard of the issues with those Ebay manifolds cracking... Also, do you know where on the manifold the cracking occurs?

this is the link to the thread, has some good interesting points.. worth a read

aus rotor forums turbo bag discussion

I had a rotor period in my life back in the day and I used exhaust tape back then without issue (I used it correctly). However even back then my own brother wrapped his headers on his 13B bidgeport in his usual haphazard way and had them crack to bits in less than 6 months. I rewrapped a new set of headers for him and they never cracked again. Even after years of hard use when the car was sold the headers were actually in good nick. The real reason is more often due to over rich mixtures up the top end , rotors have very low tollerence to pinging and so tuners can run the peak very rich (mostly the carbie boys are guilty here) and this will wear out headers with or without tape. The old solution was to use very thick guage steam pipe tubing.

NASCAR teams have used the stuff for years, even in that arena there are scaremongering HPC coating companies that try to make out that the header wear on those cars is due to thermo tape when its actually the unburnt fuel going through them and combusting inside that does it.

Think about the rally cars and the antilag feature they use, that definately does wear things out real fast. This is also true of diesel turbos or even headers where the mixtures are set way too rich in an easy chase for greater power. The late burn thorugh the exhaust valve pushes the egt through the roof. At the very top end race teams don't really care too much if the headers or turbos need replacement every few meets.

So it's really more of a warning about antilag and afterburn. Thermo wrap is fine and good.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...