Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys I have a R34 with a Trust TD05 18g turbo kit on it.

The problem is that it isn’t holding boost above 12psi. when we try to put the boost up to 17psi the boost curve spikes at 17 then drops to 12 then up to 14 then back down to 12 and stays their. One of the guys form Trust Japan was over visiting Australia and he said to put a cat in and I will fix it. I did this Tuesday and is still the same but making less power.

Has any one else had any experiences with this or has any ideas?

thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/108044-turbo-problems/
Share on other sites

Does it by any chance have overboost protection similar to blitz units where the duty cycle is dropped by a preset amount when x psi is reached?

from you description of the response your gain is set very high as well which could also be contributing.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/108044-turbo-problems/#findComment-1993004
Share on other sites

what exhast setup do you have?

try a dyno run with the exhaust dropped

it sounds like its a restriction and causing too much backpressure

3inch dump into high Flow cat then splits into 2x2inch pipes into a little muffler then out the back.

it had no cat first and was doing the same thing and i got told to put one in because it didn't have enough back pressure.

it is a pain in the a$$

Does it by any chance have overboost protection similar to blitz units where the duty cycle is dropped by a preset amount when x psi is reached?

from you description of the response your gain is set very high as well which could also be contributing.

could not say my tuner sets it up.

their is also a r33 with the same turbo and same problem and he is using a blitz dsbc spec r

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/108044-turbo-problems/#findComment-1993034
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

sorry to bring up an old thread,,

but i've got the same issue,, though i've still got the stock turbo,, but have pfc,, and manual boost controller,, i set it to 12psi,, and it drops down to 8psi by the time it gets to redline,,, have a 3" turbo back exhaust and k&n panel filter,,,

(also, as a check, i tried it once at 14psi and boost dropped down to 10psi at redline)

thought it was the boost controller,, but its seems to work fine on another car,,

how would i check the wastegate actuator to see if its working ok??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/108044-turbo-problems/#findComment-2105589
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...