Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

im currently working on my project R32 GTR, but when i get bored of that project i really want to do an all motor RB30DE in an S13 coupe, or an R32 GTS.

ive read through a bunch of the RB30 threads here and on other forums. i have a few unanswered questions... what compression ratio would you get adding an RB25 head onto the RB30? and from there, whats the easiest way to get a higher compression ratio?

is there a piston set i can buy that will give me a higher compression? i think it would be really cool to do an 10:1 or 11:1, but i dont know how high people have gone. if anyone has any URLs they could throw my way, id appriciate it much.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/109155-high-compression-rb30de/
Share on other sites

well there is a thread down the page a bit titled "my rb30de" thats my rb30de build. im running high compression. and from the distance i have done its a very drivable car with plenty of power from take off all the way up to redline. well i havnt reved up there quite yet. but thats another 800ks away... lol

the compression ratio is 8.3 if you just put rb25 head on stock rb30e block.

the cheepest and easyest way to get high compressoin is to use rb25de pistons and you will end up with a compression ratio of about 10.4.

mine is 10.43:1 using rb25 vvt head and rb25de pistons

if you wana raise it even more then you could deck the block and plain the head.

i remember peter from advan giving me alot of info on this engine a while back when i was going to build one

they built one with 12:1 compression and raced it in endurance type stuff

give em a call they should be able to help you out

If you use the standard flat top pistons in the RB30 you end up with around 8.5:1 compression.

But you can fit the RB25DE pistons to your RB30 bottom end. these pistons are domed and will give you a compression in the range you want. I am not sure of the exact figure, but it will definitely be greater than 10:1

thanks for the replys guys, that was the info i was looking for.

do people generally use the RB25DE ECU for this kind of project? there is a local guy here that can tune those kinds of ECUs, would this be sufficiant?

Edited by impreziv

im running a rb25de ecu for my run in.. seems to be running fine at the mo.

its mainly just till i decide what mods i wana do and what ecu i want to run.

im considering link at the mo as it would be suitable if i decide to go with hex throttles.

but then i need to find a tuner i trust that isnt an 8hr drive away...

um im getting mine dynoed in 1 week so i can give you a firmish figure then.

i would be expecting atleast 135rwkw. if its less it probly means my tune is way out.

all i can say is so far i have impressed a few of my trubo mates with the power and torque of the NA

i think you just use a powerfc for rb25det?

Just did a quick computer simulation on Dyno 2000.

RB30, 11:1 compression, extractors, std cams = 200 Hp at 5,500 Rpm

Estimated 126 RWKw, an absolute torque monster 210 Ft/lb

RB30, 11:1 compression, extractors, 262 cams = 266 Hp at 6,500 Rpm

Estimated 168 RWKw, 231 Ft/lb at 5,000 Rpm, but it looses a lot of torque below 4,000 Rpm.

That would be my guess if it is properly tuned.

Just did a quick computer simulation on Dyno 2000.

RB30, 11:1 compression, extractors, std cams = 200 Hp at 5,500 Rpm

Estimated 126 RWKw, an absolute torque monster 210 Ft/lb

RB30, 11:1 compression, extractors, 262 cams = 266 Hp at 6,500 Rpm

Estimated 168 RWKw, 231 Ft/lb at 5,000 Rpm, but it looses a lot of torque below 4,000 Rpm.

That would be my guess if it is properly tuned.

What's 210Ft/lb in Nm?

http://img234.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dynosheetsml7kv.jpg

i got that dyno sheet off the rb30det thread in forced induction.

the red line is it as an NA, the black is trubo so obviously its running the lower comperssoin but it still put out 135rwkw.

my car pulls hard right up too rev limiter. i cant rember what that is tho as i have only hit it once by accident cus the car just revs so damn quick for a stock flywheel.

so that dyno thing isnt that accurate but thats cus its a simulation

i guess next sat i will have an answer of how much power and torque.

it has impressed everybody who has ridden in it so far and im definatly happy :).

That dyno run wasn't exactly N/A.

The wastegate was simply wired open.

When I had my rb30det run in it made 133rwkw with the wastegate wired open on a different dyno, so a very similiar result.

It made stuff all boost until peak power due to the wastegate being wired open.

So... 133rwkw on 6psi with crap all ign. timing and from memory 10.5:1 afr's.

Just because its a 3ltr doesn't mean it will make more power than the 2.5ltr. But do expect more average power, which is what impresses people when the ride in it. :whistling:

With a slightly higher comp ratio and good tuning it will make the same peak power as an rb25de with the same mods.

All the best, I'm keen to see how it turns out. :stupid:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...