Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 82
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

para u mean the Burj Al Arab?

BURJ-AL-ARAB.jpg

its really a long way away from the airport so they should have built it closer to town. maybe its closer to snobsville (if there is such a thing over there)

best it could do was this:

I was there in January and two things really blew me away.

1. Get busted doing 280ks an hour on the highway and you get a small fine and told to be on your way.

2. look closely at the photo and you can see a waterslide park across from the hotel. Some of the hottest Russian chicks I've eva seen push you in a rubber tube down the different slides. It's really cool !!!

Sorry for the off topic but is it expensive to go to Dubai?

Use it as a stopover with Emirates en route to Europe and it doesnt cost anything extra. Europe return flights out of oz are between $1700-$2000 and increase a bit more for certain seasons/times.

Go to the Emirates website as they fly straight there from Melbourne in one leg.

Dave: That's the area in Verona yeah?

I've been there :P

Anyhoo - more looking around (mainly for cool 'vehicles') and I found an SR-71 on the deck of a carrier! Plus the Space Shuttle and some Saturn 5 rockets!

This is the coolest toy ever.

post-936-1143873323.jpg

post-936-1143873342.jpg

Dave: That's the area in Verona yeah?

I've been there :D

Rome - Collesseum. Reso not goot enough to see all the stray cats that live in there these days.

Anyhoo - more looking around (mainly for cool 'vehicles') and I found an SR-71 on the deck of a carrier! Plus the Space Shuttle and some Saturn 5 rockets!

This is the coolest toy ever.

Some nice finds there James!

I was there in January and two things really blew me away.

2. look closely at the photo and you can see a waterslide park across from the hotel. Some of the hottest Russian chicks I've eva seen push you in a rubber tube down the different slides. It's really cool !!!

I'll be there on May 1st (the water park). Now I'm even more excited! I'm stopping off for 2 days on the way home from Germany just to go to this water park.

I'll be there on May 1st (the water park). Now I'm even more excited! I'm stopping off for 2 days on the way home from Germany just to go to this water park.

WTF?... Hot russian chicks?? Bastard, bastard, bastard!!!

Pics or BAAAAANNNNNNNN! (Can a member ban a mod??)

  • 5 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...