Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Originally posted by skyzerr33

that supra sure does look line a gtst hehe

the n/a is quite respectable but the gtst should take it.

Oh yeah if I squint hard enouogh I can see the similarity :)

My girlfriend described it as a Frog from Star Wars (GT-Wing) :D

Hmm looks as though the N/A Supra will be an easy target for those Commodores now :P

Originally posted by GTAAH

Questionable move there dude, NA Supras are a high 14 car if you're lucky. Worst thing is you can maybe screw another 10-15hp out of them easily and thats it.

Jash

Yeah, I know .. I didn't buy an N/A car and expect it to be fast. I just thought that there are too may Skylines in the street and that the Supra looks a lot nicer, my opinion only of sourse :P

As long as it's as fast as my girlfriend's 2000 Prelude, I'm happy, because the only person I'll probably race against would be her :)

Still though. high 14 for a na car is awesome

what does ur average N/A v8 pull? with litle to no tuning as this car has had.

Jash- could u posibly approximate what a TT MkIV with an auto should run down the qtr. (stock) i just want to see if my dad is driving bad or the limits of the car are about 14.11

thanx - Psiker

Originally posted by GTS-t VSPEC

Very nice looking Supra. I think the NA Supras have 178kw, which is not bad, and a mid 14 1/4 time on street tyres. They have the looks but will not be as quick as the GTS-t.  

See'ya:burnout:

I think this is a "chick magnet" rather than a Commodore killer :P

Anyway, here is the specs

1996 Toyota Supra SZ-R

3.0L non-turbo

6 speed manual automatic

Volk TE37 alloy wheels

aftermarket body kit

GT rear wing (original included also)

aftermarket exhaust & air filter

aftermarket suspension

Bride drivers seat

Recaro passengr seat

steering wheel

CD player & subwoofer

Does anyone know if you can tell the difference between a TT Supra and an N/A, just by looking at the exterior ??

Bye

Richard.

Originally posted by Nizmo

poser hahah

nah nice wheels mate - but arent u going to get bored of an N/A - know i would :P

Definately a poser car :) !!!

But as for being bored I ws actually getting bored with the R33 GTST :D .. I bought the Supra because of the way it looks and the style, which in my opinion is much nicer than the GTST.

Anyway, probably keep this for 2 years and then get an NSX. Now that's a car that no one woul call boring !!! ;)

Bye

Richard.

Originally posted by simplelogik

I think this is a "chick magnet" rather than a Commodore killer :P  

Anyway, here is the specs  

1996 Toyota Supra SZ-R

3.0L non-turbo

6 speed manual automatic

Volk TE37 alloy wheels

aftermarket body kit

GT rear wing (original included also)

aftermarket exhaust & air filter

aftermarket suspension

Bride drivers seat

Recaro passengr seat

steering wheel

CD player & subwoofer

Does anyone know if you can tell the difference between a TT Supra and an N/A, just by looking at the exterior ??

Bye

Richard.

i saw that car on the PMS (prestige motorsport) mailing list..

ooooh triptronic - always wanted triptronic haha they're fun - i know its not the dinky-di manual but still wish my baby was triptronic.

Poser car - well i guess i'll see you doing laps around northo on a sat night with the other posers then haha :P

Love your work mate definately a horny looking car.

Originally posted by Adrian_perth

man n/a?

wheres the fun in that?

nice car

but i reckon the main reason for owning a jap import

is the fun you get out of it by moding it?

correct me if i'm wrong!

adrian :P

Hehe I don't waste money on making my car faster, because even my 1st car, a 79 Mazda 323 is capable of going faster than the legal speed limit :) ..

Anyway, the only "mods" that I spend money on these days is my house, and after spending 10s of thousand of dollars, the bloody thing is still no quicker than when I first bought it :D ..

Originally posted by simplelogik

Anyway, the only "mods" that I spend money on these days  is my house, and after spending 10s of thousand of dollars, the bloody thing is still no quicker than when I first bought it :P ..

hahaha

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...