Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Originally posted by skyzerr33

that supra sure does look line a gtst hehe

the n/a is quite respectable but the gtst should take it.

Oh yeah if I squint hard enouogh I can see the similarity :)

My girlfriend described it as a Frog from Star Wars (GT-Wing) :D

Hmm looks as though the N/A Supra will be an easy target for those Commodores now :P

Originally posted by GTAAH

Questionable move there dude, NA Supras are a high 14 car if you're lucky. Worst thing is you can maybe screw another 10-15hp out of them easily and thats it.

Jash

Yeah, I know .. I didn't buy an N/A car and expect it to be fast. I just thought that there are too may Skylines in the street and that the Supra looks a lot nicer, my opinion only of sourse :P

As long as it's as fast as my girlfriend's 2000 Prelude, I'm happy, because the only person I'll probably race against would be her :)

Still though. high 14 for a na car is awesome

what does ur average N/A v8 pull? with litle to no tuning as this car has had.

Jash- could u posibly approximate what a TT MkIV with an auto should run down the qtr. (stock) i just want to see if my dad is driving bad or the limits of the car are about 14.11

thanx - Psiker

Originally posted by GTS-t VSPEC

Very nice looking Supra. I think the NA Supras have 178kw, which is not bad, and a mid 14 1/4 time on street tyres. They have the looks but will not be as quick as the GTS-t.  

See'ya:burnout:

I think this is a "chick magnet" rather than a Commodore killer :P

Anyway, here is the specs

1996 Toyota Supra SZ-R

3.0L non-turbo

6 speed manual automatic

Volk TE37 alloy wheels

aftermarket body kit

GT rear wing (original included also)

aftermarket exhaust & air filter

aftermarket suspension

Bride drivers seat

Recaro passengr seat

steering wheel

CD player & subwoofer

Does anyone know if you can tell the difference between a TT Supra and an N/A, just by looking at the exterior ??

Bye

Richard.

Originally posted by Nizmo

poser hahah

nah nice wheels mate - but arent u going to get bored of an N/A - know i would :P

Definately a poser car :) !!!

But as for being bored I ws actually getting bored with the R33 GTST :D .. I bought the Supra because of the way it looks and the style, which in my opinion is much nicer than the GTST.

Anyway, probably keep this for 2 years and then get an NSX. Now that's a car that no one woul call boring !!! ;)

Bye

Richard.

Originally posted by simplelogik

I think this is a "chick magnet" rather than a Commodore killer :P  

Anyway, here is the specs  

1996 Toyota Supra SZ-R

3.0L non-turbo

6 speed manual automatic

Volk TE37 alloy wheels

aftermarket body kit

GT rear wing (original included also)

aftermarket exhaust & air filter

aftermarket suspension

Bride drivers seat

Recaro passengr seat

steering wheel

CD player & subwoofer

Does anyone know if you can tell the difference between a TT Supra and an N/A, just by looking at the exterior ??

Bye

Richard.

i saw that car on the PMS (prestige motorsport) mailing list..

ooooh triptronic - always wanted triptronic haha they're fun - i know its not the dinky-di manual but still wish my baby was triptronic.

Poser car - well i guess i'll see you doing laps around northo on a sat night with the other posers then haha :P

Love your work mate definately a horny looking car.

Originally posted by Adrian_perth

man n/a?

wheres the fun in that?

nice car

but i reckon the main reason for owning a jap import

is the fun you get out of it by moding it?

correct me if i'm wrong!

adrian :P

Hehe I don't waste money on making my car faster, because even my 1st car, a 79 Mazda 323 is capable of going faster than the legal speed limit :) ..

Anyway, the only "mods" that I spend money on these days is my house, and after spending 10s of thousand of dollars, the bloody thing is still no quicker than when I first bought it :D ..

Originally posted by simplelogik

Anyway, the only "mods" that I spend money on these days  is my house, and after spending 10s of thousand of dollars, the bloody thing is still no quicker than when I first bought it :P ..

hahaha

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...