Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

im looking at getting a set of coilovers from Just Jap:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...howtopic=108386

These are the g4 ones going for $1399, now the spring rate is : 13 (F) 8.7 ® Kg/mm, now i have read that its quite hard that rate.

can anyone tell me what a decent spring rate would be for a street r33 gtst-t as just jap make can get them at custom spring rates for both front and back

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/113911-coilover-spring-rate/
Share on other sites

standard rate for jap coilovers is 8kgmm/6kgmm for front and rear

usually this is considered too stiff for australian streets, so maybe something a bit softer is in order. Fulcrum distribute Tien Super street coilovers tuned for australian conditions, might be worth a look.

I'm gettin my teins for $1800 tomorrow if any one wants some and got the cash in sydney i'll pick em up for em ,mine is for 32 gtst prob same price for 33

Prefer to pay $400 extra and get much superior than just jap bodgys from thailand ,vietnam wherever there made

PM

i have BC coilovers in my r33. the spring rate for mine is 8kg front and 6kg rear and it rides fine on the bumpy NZ roads.

if you wana harden it up you just dial up the dampning.

jap coilovers are often insanly hard with there spring rates.

Here in the UK most of the very quickest Group N touring car R32 GTR's, in their heyday, ran 1000 plus pound inch front springs and around 700 lbs inch rears. They were fully caged, so the shells were a LOT stiffer than stock, but it seems to differ greatly from SK's findings, even given the big weight differences between RWD and 4WD cars.

Here in the UK most of the very quickest Group N touring car R32 GTR's, in their heyday, ran 1000 plus pound inch front springs and around 700 lbs inch rears. They were fully caged, so the shells were a LOT stiffer than stock, but it seems to differ greatly from SK's findings, even given the big weight differences between RWD and 4WD cars.

Since we race a Production R32GTR N1 spec and an Improved Production R32GTR I guess I can comment on the differences;

Group N cars aren't allowed to change their stabiliser bars, so they have to run high spring rates front and rear to compensate.

Group N cars aren't allowed to change their anti dive, so they have to run high front spring rates to compensate.

Group N cars aren't allowed to change their anti squat, so they have to run high rear spring rates to compensate.

Group N cars aren't allowed to change their caster, so they have to run high front spring rates to control the roll enough for the camber to compensate.

Group N cars are allowed to run full slick racing tyres, which will tolerate a much higher spring rate than a road radial or even an "R" tyre.

Lastly, shock absorber technology has moved a long way since 1989 and we simply don't have to run the high spring rates now that we did then.

Hope that answered the question.

:) cheers :(

PS; The tracks in the UK are a lot smoother than what we have locally.

Edited by Sydneykid
  • 2 weeks later...

:) Hi

I have a question about the spring rates on my car.

l own a r33 gtst and it feels like l'm in the flintstones car, it is that stiff l dont like driving it,

l called whiteline and they said they could make some springs up for me, however l'm not too sure on the spring rate to give them. l was advised at 6kg for front and 4 kg for the rear. Can anyone give me a comparison as to what 6/kg 4/kg would feel like? (not so smoothe roads still feel heaps bumpy??)

After driving my car for the past few months l am really sick of it.

what is the best rate for me?

I am just driving it to and from work, l dont race it ( i'll still have these coils to changeover if l ever want to), rarley thrash it. l just want more comfort over potholes and dips in roads. (right now reflector's on the road feel like potholes, and potholes feel like l'm driving on a cattle grid.)

l am about to measure the springs now to give to Whiteline. They want to know the inside diameter of the spring and the spring height.

and my last question is ( if l can explain myself properly)

When l give these dimensions to them will factor in the softer rate that l want and give me a longer spring to compensate the "squish" ( l'm sure thats not the correct terminology) or compression its going to be under?

l have JIC coilovers, and there yellow( l dont know if they colour code their shocks just a bit of FYI)

Sorry for the longass post and for any one that has read this far and those that reply, thanks in advance. :)

13 & 8.7 kg/mm is beyond belief. We run 6 & 4.5 kg/mm on the 2WD race cars and 4 & 3.5 kg/mm on the 2WD road cars. (SK)

- As stated by SK, the 4 and 3.5kg/mm im sure would be fine for your road car which sees no track work. About the springs, i think they will make them to the same as what you have on now, they will just be a weaker spring.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks for the reply mate. Well I really hope its a hose then not engine out job
    • But.... the reason I want to run a 60 weight is so at 125C it has the same viscosity as a 40 weight at 100C. That's the whole reason. If the viscosity changes that much to drop oil pressure from 73psi to 36psi then that's another reason I should be running an oil that mimics the 40 weight at 100C. I have datalogs from the dyno with the oil pressure hitting 73psi at full throttle/high RPM. At the dyno the oil temp was around 100-105C. The pump has a 70psi internal relief spring. It will never go/can't go above 70psi. The GM recommendation of 6psi per 1000rpm is well under that... The oil sensor for logging in LS's is at the valley plate at the back of  the block/rear of where the heads are near the firewall. It's also where the knock sensors are which are notable for 'false knock'. I'm hoping I just didn't have enough oil up top causing some chatter instead of rods being sad (big hopium/copium I know) LS's definitely heat up the oil more than RB's do, the stock vettes for example will hit 300F(150C) in a lap or two and happily track for years and years. This is the same oil cooler that I had when I was in RB land, being the Setrab 25 row oil cooler HEL thing. I did think about putting a fan in there to pull air out more, though I don't know if that will actually help in huge load situations with lots of speed. I think when I had the auto cooler. The leak is where the block runs to the oil cooler lines, the OEM/Dash oil pressure sender is connected at that junction and is what broke. I'm actually quite curious to see how much oil in total capacity is actually left in the engine. As it currently stands I'm waiting on that bush to adapt the sender to it. The sump is still full (?) of oil and the lines and accusump have been drained, but the filter and block are off. I suspect there's maybe less than 1/2 the total capacity there should be in there. I have noticed in the past that topping up oil has improved oil pressure, as reported by the dash sensor. This is all extremely sketchy hence wanting to get it sorted out lol.
    • I neglected to respond to this previously. Get it up to 100 psi, and then you'll be OK.
    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
×
×
  • Create New...