Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ide keep it and sell when youre off your ps...

Out of every single skyline I have ever driven: 31gxe, 32gtst, 33gts4 and 33gtst... the 33gts4 was thee biggest slug of them all. The extra weight really weighs them down and they are dreadfully slow and torqueless. They do however handle great which is what you would want not power on your p's. I have heard the extra weight makes them more thirsty then their gts25 peers

Ide keep it and sell when youre off your ps...

Out of every single skyline I have ever driven: 31gxe, 32gtst, 33gts4 and 33gtst... the 33gts4 was thee biggest slug of them all. The extra weight really weighs them down and they are dreadfully slow and torqueless. They do however handle great which is what you would want not power on your p's. I have heard the extra weight makes them more thirsty then their gts25 peers

what would be some practical ways to reduce its weight to not make it as sluggish ??

Go to the gym and do cardio workouts. Improve your driving skills. Service the car to make it run better. Seriously wouldn't bother modding it much to make it "faster", just improve the grip/handling and improve your driving skills.

I doubt the N/A would use more fuel under everyday driving conditions. If you stepped out of a turbo Skyline and into an N/A Skyline, of course it'll feel slower so you'll thrash it more.

what would be some practical ways to reduce its weight to not make it as sluggish ??

Nah man, just gotta live with it.. they are what they.

If you respect the car and love it enough to not wanna sell it then for your full liscence do an rb26dett / stagea rb25det conversion + 5 stud coversion & brakes.

There good cars when you figure them out...
Ive rebuilt the engine with New genuine crank, rods, 40thou pistons and rings, ACL racing bearings, oil pump, water pump then deck, honed and bored the block 40thou. Rebuild the head (but reused the valve-train parts) and full genuine gasket kit and Timing belt-kit everything cost me $2086 but i did all the work myself and i work for Nissan parts so i did get cost prices but the car is running well now 115-120KW@all four wheels.

Ive gone on to change all new genuine part like sensors (AFM, TPS, 02 sensor, coolant sensors), AAC valve, air regulator, throttle body, injectors, fuel pump, coilpacks, Exedy heavy duty clutch, flywheel, all the hoses (genuine coolant, fuel, breather) stack of genuine bolts, heart and A//c parts, Nismo engine mounts. The list goes on, ive done a lot to the handling of the car aswell like $3000 coilover and changed a few other things like new steering pump and rack and nismo rack bushes etc etc etc.

What im getting at is im now off my P plates and have spent a load and everything ive done is staying and helping with my turbo build apart from the injectors and fuel pump. So its all money well spent, ive now got a genuine Greddy manifold, turbo and loads more. There is nothing you can do wrong when buying these cars if you keep it when your off your p plates, it is VERY easy to bolt a turbo on to them

  • 10 months later...

Hey , i have a gts4 myself , none of my friends seem to agree with me but it truly is a nugget! I bought it and resprayed it at my dads panelbeating/spray painting shop. I drive it every day to and from school and has given me no troubles if you don't include the countless times i get pulled over by cops. Overall it believe its a good car to start off with , but its still a nugget.

post-97068-13972006070097_thumb.jpg

I own a gts4 aswell. The way it handles is amazing, really scary in the wet though.

Gts4s have shorter gear ratios then the rwd models, not sure if thats a good thing or bad thing.

Weights about 100kg more then the rwd model, also drinks abit more then the rwd model.

Lauching it off the line will beat the rwd model, i swear this car was made to be launched, probably best not to do it though incase you snap a driveshaft or something.

How much fuel do you get out of a full tank? I get around 350km with about 10-15L left in the tank, it says im empty but only takes around 45-55bucks to completely fill it up, guess its reading it wrong or something. Still 45-55bucks of petrol lasts me around 350km, which is pretty bad i reckon.

Theres not really any positives to this car, if you need a part for your car, its almost impossible to find gts4 parts. It shares some parts with the gtr model, so if one of them parts goes, expect to pay a fortune.

Honestly, its a good rare and fun car to drive, but theres just too many negatives to the car, id rather the rwd model. Although i let my friend test drive my car, hes driven plenty of the non turbo rwd models before, he reckons mine was the fastest hes ever driven, so i dont think they are any bit slower then the rwd model. Also have raced a few non turbo r33s during friday night princess highway drags, i beat every single one of them, but then again they all had massive 3inch exhausts, sucks the absolute power out of them.

Positive advice i can give you is, if your going to get an exhaust, 2.5inch is the absolute max you should go. Go over 2.5inch and i promise you your car will sound like crap, and youll lose to honda civics, mx5s and camrys. Get a cold air intake, extractors, 2.5inch exhaust, clean the throttle body, if the cars not thrashed to death, and if its manual, youll be getting low 7s-mid 7s 0-100, so your car will be about as a quick as a stock n/a supra. My car got 7.5 seconds 0-100 without a cold air intake and without extractors, so they have decent power for what they are.

Expect all the turbo guys to make fun of you and claim youll lose to camrys, wont happen unless you go 3inch exhaust. Mod your car the right way and youll have yourself a respectable skyline. Wont be the fastest p plate legal car, but itll be up there as long as you do it right. Mess it up and youll be slower then hondas...

Hahah thanks buddy well i already made a stupid mistake involving the exhause. I have got a 2'5 exhaust, stainless, which used to have a twin tip muffler . My friends convinced me to put a not too big but droney rocket tip and it feels like i lost alot of back pressure, and ive been considering putting the twint tip back on like in this photo.

And yes mine is manual and it was the only one i ever found manual. Btw i did find out how to put it in RWD after doing a bit of research ;)

post-97068-1397284004567_thumb.jpg

Lauching it off the line will beat the rwd model, i swear this car was made to be launched, probably best not to do it though incase you snap a driveshaft or something.

My GTR making 420Kw at the Wheels couldn't do damage. The first thing to go would be the input shaft in the gearbox. I doubt you will break anything as its too under powered to. I do know the whole rear setup on the GTS-4 has nothing to do with a GTR the driveshafts are 5 bolt design and not the stronger 6 bolts like the GTR but they still wouldn't brake. In fact the only part on the drive train that shares the same things as a GTR are only the front driveshafts, and transfer case. The suspension is even worse, the whole rear cross member, hubs, knuckles and struts are different. No Hicas from factory aswell, only about 20% of the car is like a GTR.

Spent about $7,000+ on a Engine rebuild making it 40thou using only genuine parts everywhere
About another $10,000 on better Exedy clutch, Greddy coilovers, nismo control arms, Genuine Driveshafts new, all new power steering pump, rack and lines genuine, slotted rotors.... load more things to the car and its still my daily because thats all they will ever be. You can't even Turbo the car if you want to without tapping the block unlike the RWD models that have blanking bolts in the side of the block where the turbo oil feed and coolant feed come from on the GTS-t.

Also easiest car to get parts for as 90% of the parts are still available through Nissan, (could choose what size pistons and rings i wanted from Nissan even), Clutch & drivetrain, most suspension components, brakes and whole steering system all using new genuine parts from Nissan. All body parts the same as GTS-t so obviously even easier to get body parts new for. Although front guards for GTS-t are NLA now.
Only reason i know all this stuff is i worked for Nissan Parts and got it all at cost ;)

Also i get 100Km 12.5L around town and 9L to 100Km on the highway
I stopped and saved when i couldn't turbo my car, Got a GTR, Forged engine, built head, port and polish everything 0-100Km in less then 3 sec on reliable tune :yes:

Wow! 420kw at the wheels, 0-100 in 3 secs, that things a monster. My mechanic told me dont launch the car incase you stuff the driveshafts, not sure why he said it but its made me paranoid now lol. Its nice to know the potential the car has.

adam96 put the twin tip back on man, the car will be more responsive, youll be less cop bait, and youll save fuel. With your current exhaust, its sluggish in low rpms, your stepping on the accelerator more to get moving when your in the low rpms. This means you will be drinking more fuel while driving in daily conditions. My friend has an r34 n/a which has the newer and more fuel efficient engine rb25de neo. He had a 3inch blitz nur spec exhaust I think it was. Hes fuel consumption was way worse then mine. Hes car is lighter, and has the more fuel efficient engine yet drinks more and is slower because of that exhaust.

anyways whats your fuel comsumption like with your current exhaust and what was it like with the twin tip?

If he's doing a trip of purely highway driving then it's poor economy, but around town they certainly aren't an economical engine compared to something like a 4cyl hatch back.

And the fact that both you and adam havn't given exact figures to work out accurate economy, we don't know what your economy is. Then you have to take into account driving style, driving situation (lot of stop start or city traffic that flows).

If you're getting 10 to 13l/100kms on city driving then you're doing ok. You'll be doing well to get under 10l/100kms on city driving unless you only drive on the motorways at 80kmh or more, in which case that's classed as highway driving. In which case getting under 9l/100kms is doing well.

Your economy of 350kms to 44-55l works out to be a bit over 10l/100kms (roughly estimated as a worse case scenario, so it could be better) which is pretty good for a natro skyline. People often think that a natro skyline should run cheaply, but they don't. They are a somewhat highly strung 2.5l 6cyl in a heavy car (for what they are). They will always get worse economy than something like a lancer or pulsar by a noticeable amount, as those sorts of cars are designed and tuned to be economical. on the highway you'll find that a natro skyline isn't much better (if at all) than a Commodore or falcon, since they are big torquey motors that can just amble along at 1800rpm or so at 100kmh.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
    • @PranK can you elaborate further on the Colorlock Dye? The website has a lot of options. I'm sure you've done all the research. I have old genuine leather seats that I have bought various refurbing creams and such, but never a dye. Any info on how long it lasts? Does it wash out? Is it a hassle? What product do I actually need? Am I just buying this kit and following the steps the page advises or something else? https://www.colourlockaustralia.com.au/colourlock-leather-repair-kit-dye.html
×
×
  • Create New...