Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I had a hks gt2530, 3inch system, high flow cat, split dump front pipe, ebc, power fc, pod. With this set up, it was making 212rwkw @15psi. I wanted to get up around the 270rwkw mark. So I did plenty of reading and decided going with a New hks gt2835 pro s bolt on kit.

My new mods are, gt2835 pro s, 550cc injectors, z32 afm, evc V ebc, 040 fuel pump, and i put a set of slitfire coils in just for good measures.

I thought I might get around 250 rwkw as here in tassie we have only got 95 ron pulp. But when i went to pick my car up and was told it made 222rwkw @15psi, 198rwkw @12psi, wtf! i was so pi$$ed off. :) just spent 5+ grand to get a 10rwkw increase. My tuner said its because we have shit fuel down here. Would 3 ron make that much difference? Anybody got any ideas why it would only make this amount of power?

thanks

Edited by woolls
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/115923-hks-gt2835-pro-s/
Share on other sites

I had a hks gt2530, 3inch system, high flow cat, split dump front pipe, ebc, power fc, pod. With this set up, it was making 212rwkw @15psi. I wanted to get up around the 270rwkw mark. So I did plenty of reading and decided going with a New hks gt2835 pro s bolt on kit.

My new mods are, gt2835 pro s, 550cc injectors, z32 afm, evc V ebc, 040 fuel pump, and i put a set of slitfire coils in just for good measures.

I thought I might get around 250 rwkw as here in tassie we have only got 95 ron pulp. But when i went to pick my car up and was told it made 222rwkw @15psi, 198rwkw @12psi, wtf! i was so pi$$ed off. :) just spent 5+ grand to get a 10rwkw increase. My tuner said its because we have shit fuel down here. Would 3 ron make that much difference? Anybody got any ideas why it would only make this amount of power?

thanks

post ya dyno graph up that will give us something to start with....

a few suggestions;

1) try a tune/run with premium fuel (or make some up)

2) try a tune/run with the exhaust dropped off

95ron fuel is likely to affect it quiet a lot as it will knock significantly more, which is why the power figure is much lower.

I had a hks gt2530, 3inch system, high flow cat, split dump front pipe, ebc, power fc, pod. With this set up, it was making 212rwkw @15psi. I wanted to get up around the 270rwkw mark. So I did plenty of reading and decided going with a New hks gt2835 pro s bolt on kit.

My new mods are, gt2835 pro s, 550cc injectors, z32 afm, evc V ebc, 040 fuel pump, and i put a set of slitfire coils in just for good measures.

I thought I might get around 250 rwkw as here in tassie we have only got 95 ron pulp. But when i went to pick my car up and was told it made 222rwkw @15psi, 198rwkw @12psi, wtf! i was so pi$$ed off. :) just spent 5+ grand to get a 10rwkw increase. My tuner said its because we have shit fuel down here. Would 3 ron make that much difference? Anybody got any ideas why it would only make this amount of power?

thanks

Take it to 20 psi. The turbo can take it. I have the same turbo. I have made 310rwkw all be it with head work, greddy plenum and exhaust manifold. This could be worth 30rwkw extra so yours should reach at least 270rwkw. You may need some octane boost as we have 98 RON. Run 12 AFR and maybe 15 deg base timing or a little more conservative if your worried and slowly lean on it. Keep an eye on detonation etc. 250rwkw should be easily achievable.

Yes, the turbo can take it.

No, the fuel being used cant

I wouldnt be using octane booster all the time though, its just a band-aid

If your going to run on 95, then thats about as good as its going to get im afraid.

You might be able to get a couple more kw but your tuner is obviously taking the smart approach

I know some other tassie guys get drums of Ultimate shipped down... one assumes they still do, maybe you should do the same?

This might be a stupid question but was the previous 212kw made on the same dyno as the 222kw run? Different dynos different numbers :wave:

Im in tassie also and have a 3037proS and I made 270kw at 1bar with similar mods so with the smaller 2835proS 220-230kw at 15psi would sound about right, I would think, with the shitty fuel you get down here.

I looked at shipping a higher octane fuel down in 205 drums but to make it cost affective youd have to buy 2-4 drums of the stuff, have you got 2 grad to spend on fuel? but there is a place down the coast you can get even higher octane fuel from for not much more if you wanna get pretty serious, so.... If I were you id be waiting for another 6-12 months untill we get 98ron at the pump.

This might be a stupid question but was the previous 212kw made on the same dyno as the 222kw run? Different dynos different numbers :O

Yes same dyno.

thanks for the replies. Looks like I will just wait till we get som 98 ron pulp.

If detonation is the issue can you run lower viscosity oils and lower coolant temps ? Can we assume your car has a cold air intake and filtration system thats up to the task .

I would also be doing the exhaust manifold vs boost pressure test as this will show up any higher exhaust system pressures . Not all 3" systems or cats are created equal .

You could also do a pressure test at the inlet manifold to see if theres any loss of pressure between here and the compressor outlet that would indicate a restriction or a leak .

I would be wanting to know what the air/fuel ratios are under boost as well because filthy rich mixtures can create detonation issues and cost power .

Cheers A .

If detonation is the issue can you run lower viscosity oils and lower coolant temps ? Can we assume your car has a cold air intake and filtration system thats up to the task .

I would also be doing the exhaust manifold vs boost pressure test as this will show up any higher exhaust system pressures . Not all 3" systems or cats are created equal .

You could also do a pressure test at the inlet manifold to see if theres any loss of pressure between here and the compressor outlet that would indicate a restriction or a leak .

I would be wanting to know what the air/fuel ratios are under boost as well because filthy rich mixtures can create detonation issues and cost power .

Cheers A .

Thanks for the info disco, not sure what the afr are, not on the dyno print out.

No cold air intake, just pod.

i use 4100 motul oil and water temps about 75 (I think, have to look at that)

will try the preasure tests

thanks again

Leigh

Lower viscosity oils have nothing to do with detonation at all really... Coolant temps might but at the end of the day its a real bandaid fix via a cooler thermostat.

I'd be using a borescope and sussing out the amount of carbon you have on the piston tops etc. Excessive deposits can raise the compression, leading to pinging. Old pinging cars are a testament to this.

Then again another 3 RON increase to 98 wont give you another 50rwkw either. Hmmm...

Did you select a maximum of 15psi due to detonation above this boost level? Or did you select this boost level with engine reliability in mind?

If it's the latter, then I'm with Grepin. I would be looking at running a little more than 15psi with the HKS GT2835 ProS. The addition of another 3-5psi will produce a significant increase in power.

As for the Tassie RON issue: When my Dad had his 2dr STI he always added 8L of toluene per tank (bought 20L drums from Shell). This was an approved and recommended practice by Subaru and Performance Automobiles - Hobart's main Subaru dealer. This is probably the best (cheapest and least destructive) option until 98RON is available.

I would very much doubt coolant temp' related detonation was a major (or minor for that matter) factor - we're talking Tassie in May, it ain't that warm! I've just come back from surfing at Seven Mile Point (near Hobart airport) and my 'nads' are yet to venture back outside my body.

At your current level of modifications I would expect ~250-260rwkw with a safe 95RON (+toluene) tune and 18-20psi boost pressure.

Edited by whatsisname

There is a train of thought getting about that lower cylinder head water jacket temps give lower combustion chamber temps so a little less heat conducted to the charge air before (and after) the plug fires to help prevent the end gasses from auto igniting .

My experience with low coolant temps was also lower running oil temperature and more drag - this was using good 20W50 mineral oils . So because the 20W50 runs cooler I use a 10W40 now in winter and the very low tech (Charade 2V G11) carby/points engine won't ping at all .

With cooling systems , if they operate as the manufacturer intended , water temperature is regulated by the thermostat so low ambient temperature such as Tassie winter should not change this . I agree with Corky when he says if there is one major issue that is the stumbling point with high performance engines its the thermal one . To use all the advantages I would be looking for the coolest air to feed the system which helps charge density and detonation resistance . I don't think the lower (not necessarily lowest) viscosity oils are an issue provided they don't get too hot and cause low pressure dramas - which are easily solved with oil coolers .

At the end of the day if you can get a few more degrees of full boost timing it can give good returns . The only disadvantage is lower heater performance but if its zero outside it should still prevent second belly button syndrome ...

Food for thought cheers A .

Yeah, what Paul said also.

Drop the exhaust, try a run.

Also, I remember a guy who had an Apexi RS6 (or whatever those turbos are called) and he got to a point where hois exhaust manifold and dump assembly was holding him back.

He changed manifold and dump system and picked up 40kw.

Discopotato hinted to this also with the exhaust manifold pressure test.....

Might be something to think about.

I've got he 2835 pro s and 255 rwkw.

I'm with Grepin as well - I say more boost - I've had mine to 22 psi and it's normally around 19-20 no problems.

Also I'm fitting a water methanol kit at the end of the year - will be interesting to see how it all goes.

Cheers

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Take the value it measured as, and pick the closest range available that is above the reading on the screen.   Also, no point just testing the coils. Read what has been said again. You need to test all your wiring, everything.
    • Does the scanner do all the CUs in the car, or only the ECU?
    • @666DAN sorry to bring you and old thread.     I've got my de+t done and it's all running great other than 1 small issue.    Car has remained auto with the na auto and tcm, I've used a stagea ecu with. NIstune board and everything is great other than my gear selection on the dash. It illuminates park, reverse, neutral, 3rd and 2nd when selected . But nothing when in  drive or what gear your in when you pop it into tiptronic. I'm sure there is maybe 1 wire in the ecu plug I need to move to rectify this. Do ya have any ideas?     Cheers man
    • Well I recently changed my rear axles and was thinking if I bumped anything, I have been driving the car for a while now though... But it has been raining today so everything is wet under the wheel arches. Brakes feel fine and can't hear any of the metal screamers, I had a squeak coming from one of the handbrake drums but that seems to have gone away a while ago. I was going down a hill when it lit up and I did feel the abs bite for a second and question why it did it?
    • Correct. Um. I dunno. I haven't cared enough about the way that the NA cars work to know for sure. But..... The 33/34 turbo manual cars have an electronic speed sensor in the gearbox that outputs a +/- (ie, sawtooth AC) voltage signal. That is connected to the speedo. The speedo then outputs a 0-5v square wave (ie, PWM) signal that the ECU (and any other CU on the bus) sees. The speed sensor is NOT directly connected to the ECU. So here's the problem. Your new ECU expects to see the PWM signal, but must somehow be getting a direct signal from the diff speed sensor. Which would suggest that the wiring of the NA car is not the same as the turbo cars. I think you will need to spend some time with (hopefully the wiring diagram for the car) and a multimeter to see what is connected to what. Then, presuming I am correct**, you would then want to separate the ECU speed signal input from the rest of the car's wiring, and probably either buy a speed signal converter, or build one using an arduino (or similar). That would take in the speed sensor signal and output a scaled (and suitably rearranged) signal for the ECU. ** We shouldn't presume that I am correct here, because there might be something else crazy going on. I don't think you could convert the speedo to be fed from the gearbox sensor, because the pulse rate from that sensor is probably different to the diff sensor and then the speedo would read wrongly. And this also wouldn't fix the ECU's problem either, because the ECU doesn't want to see the gearbox signal direct either (assuming that they are all on the same wiring, for some odd NA related reason, see above caveat!) Does this help? Probably not. Can you make it work? Almost certainly. With the above work. You should buy a handheld oscilloscope from Aliexpress so that you can view these signals directly. Connect up the probes and drive the car. Show photos of the screen when drving at known speeds and connected to different places, and we'll see what we can learn about it.
×
×
  • Create New...