Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Had my first dyno run on the R33 GTST done today. The results were a little dissapointing to say the least. This could be due to the fact that the dyno I went to reads low or my car needs an aftermarket computer.

Have a look at the dyno graphs and tell me what you think of it.

Only mods are:

3" Cat back exhaust

11psi boost (bleed valve)

K&N Panel filter in stock air box

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11631-dyno-run-results/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I wouldnt be dissapointed tehre are alot of peopel posting optimistic dyno results the main thing is you use the same dyno to compare up grades.

its a pity you graph doesnt show your A/F ratios as this would show you how richyour car is running.

and s-afc is the best remedy if you dont plan huge mods as it makes the car more adjustable.

some dyno shops have to have optimistic results to keep people coming back the dyno that alot of us melbourne people reads fairly low but at least we compare against each other

meggala

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11631-dyno-run-results/#findComment-201261
Share on other sites

Originally posted by benm

Im sorry but it sounds WAY low to me, with those sort of mods i'd be expecting around 155-160rwkw, but then again all dyno's are different they say.

Yes I agree. Which is why I'll be getting a second dyno run in the near future after I get my injectors cleaned and a full service on a different dyno.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11631-dyno-run-results/#findComment-201397
Share on other sites

Consider yourself lucky i only got 124Kw and i have a pod filter, 3"catback, Bleed valve running 10psi, and an SAFC. i was quite disappointed but the guy said my car was mifiring up top. and he said if i regap or change my spark plugs i could prolly get an extra 10Kw or something, he also said the car sounded like a Jet which is not good as it means its restrictive...and he said from his experience it looks like the Cat is holding the car back.. But when i got my car complied i told them to put a Hi flow cat on.. but the guy that tuned my car said from his experience it looks just like a cheap crappy cat!!!.. THE BASTARDS!!!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11631-dyno-run-results/#findComment-201567
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Guest SupraChigga

My first post here and not a Skyline owner:o

Anyway, I saw DriveBai's post (not trying to get flamed or anything), but if you go here you'll see my dyno figure's.

DriveBai, your dyno tuner is right it must be the cheap cat, have you replaced the cat to a hi-flow yet?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11631-dyno-run-results/#findComment-286102
Share on other sites

I'm not real technical with dyno's or engines or anything but 1 thing i noticed is that on your dyno run it only got up to a speed of about 130km/h where as on mine (http://skylines.pnc.com.au/dyno-203rwkw.jpg) the speed got up to 180km/h in 4th gear.

Was your dyno run done in 3rd gear maybe? as all the dyno runs ive seen are in 4th gear at 180km/h.

Thats just my observation anyway.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11631-dyno-run-results/#findComment-286128
Share on other sites

I have noticed that many people say they assume their car has X rwkw or whatever ...they then go to the dyno and are dissappointed at the result. Most people over estimate their rwkw by a considerable margin...the car is still the same though, if it felt good to drive before the dyno run...it is still the same afterwards.

I have to say that dyno figures would have to be a very average indicator of on road performance...It is a great way to tune your engine but high rwkw does not by itself relate to a great drive.

I guess my point is dont be dissappointed in your car just because it shows some lower numbers than you expect.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11631-dyno-run-results/#findComment-286151
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey all,   I’ve got an RB25 with a trigger kit that includes a crank wheel, and I’ve hit a wall trying to sort a timing belt tracking issue. The belt either rides right on the edge of the cam/crank pulleys or walks slightly forward once the engine starts. It tracks okay-ish for a moment, then creeps right to the edge—and honestly, it’s stressing me out.   I’ve spent hours removing and reinstalling the belt, double-checking everything:   Tensioner setup is good, checked multiple times Idler pulley and washers are all in the correct places Followed the RB25 timing procedure step-by-step     The only thing I changed was the rear crank washer—I swapped the OEM one for a Neato version, and it made things worse. The belt now sits even more forward than before. I’m beginning to think the crank trigger wheel itself (from the trigger kit) is the issue—poor design or slightly off dimensions.   What’s strange is that with the previous belt setup, it actually ran fine for a couple of years—around 4,000 to 5,000 miles, even with hard driving and high RPMs. But even then, the belt was always riding right on the edge, and I know that’s not ideal or safe long term.   At this point, I’m debating whether to:   Machine a few mm off the crank trigger wheel to bring it back in line, or Replace it entirely with a better-designed unit     Only thing is, I already have the Cherry Hall sensors, bracket, etc.—I just want to replace the wheel only, not the entire kit. Anyone know a brand or supplier that sells just the crank trigger wheel on its own?   Would really appreciate any feedback—especially from anyone who’s run into this exact issue and found a reliable fix.   Thanks in advance.
    • Hi...a little refresh. Is Nistune gonna be enough to run BoV? Or do i need some proper ECU? 
    • Yep that's pretty much what I want to see. Racecars that look and sound like the Group A but with newer tech underneath to make them faster and safer. I'm sure there's enough VK-to-VN commodore, E30 BMWs and Foxbody mustangs shells around to make up a decent number of cars with hopefully a couple of sierras, rx7 and R31s in there too. 
    • Contact Jessestreeter.com/Skevas Racing/JustJap for a new r34 rb gearbox or go a cd00# conversion. No point playing with unknown condition gearboxes.
    • Such a shame places like Amaroo Park have been redeveloped, smaller tracks always make for good racing. Cheers for sharing @PranK there's some good Lakeside video's too. Its so hard with older the cars as parts are so rare and everything was made for a particular chassis at that point in time. Even the V8 Supercar Blueprint era cars are all different between each chassis within a team as they learnt things and made improvements. The COTF cars between each Chassis builder is different too especially motor/oil systems/intakes. The Group A stuff is worth so much too especially chassis with good history. The only way to do it would be composite panels and similar engine drivelines to the original cars. Ford sierra running Focus RS driveline, Commodore running a short stroke LS/LT or a Falcon with coyote and a H Pattern dog box. Could use a standard ecu across all models with a Torque Map and DBW for parity which is not even used in Supercars currently. Hell a TCM is almost a full chassis car these days and the suspension is not even close to standard style in the front running cars.  
×
×
  • Create New...