Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well i'll be running an rb25 pfc in my rb24det using the rb20 loom and sensors in the next week, from what i can see of the wiring diagrams carl h is correct. should just bump and run.

when using one of these does all the options show correctly on the power fc controller?

i also was under the impression the series 2 ran different coils, the power fc's have the same part number so is that more wiring related?

in respect to the gtr power fc, from what i also understand it runs exactly the same pin out however the afm's need to be run in parallel and likewise with the oxy sensors. is this correct?

when we tried this on my buddies car it booted up fine and started right away, put it into the monitior mode and it displayed everything that would normaly be displayed on the rb25pfc.

played around with it and to check that the car was indeed running right lowered the revlimit to 1.5k and low and behold it cut at 1.5.

I think the RB25 PFC is a better bet for an RB20 than the GTR model, reason being that the RB20/25 share the same type of knock sensor (resonant) and the RB26 uses a flat response (non resonant) sensor.

The RB25 PFC is designed to work with the type of knock sensor that the RB20 has.

hey mate heres the pinouts for r32 rb26 ecu

rb26 ecu pinouts

are you sure this is correct? these pin outs are almost the same as the rb25 sheet here (incl the injector grounds which are different)

if you check the loom on rb20det.com you will see there is a difference between the rb20/20 det and i was always under the impression the r32 rb series had the same loom

POST EDITED

Loom is correct. I have the manual for ca18,rb20de,det,rb25de,rb26dett (r32) and it looks like that changing to a rb26 power fc you also need to swap 112 & 114 pins around + the rewiring of the afms etc

Edited by SirRacer

Using an rb26dett loom on an rb25de (r33 head) the differences are

Differences

* Wastegate valve control solonoid (dont see why u wont need it anyway)

* AFM Ground (wire afm in parallel and would be fine or dejetro)

* AFM Intake sensor front (depending on what one you use you could run 2 or wire as above, i think the 26 expects a different air temp sensor though)

* Intake air temp sensor

* Throttle valve switch (dont have a clue what this is but affects r32 also)

* Fuel pump terminal control output 1

* Fuel pump terminal control output 2

* Sub electrical fan relay

r32 rb25de(Loom is basically same as rb20det, however rb20 has a fuel control terminal volt control output and FICD solenoid input signal.

rb20/25de (r32) with r33 rb25 computer

Differences

* FICD solenoid input signal (not used by r33 computer or rb20det loom)

* Swapping of injectors to suit loom 112 & 114

* Throttle valve switch (isnt on r33 loom)

r33 rb25de loom is the same as rb25det

some things we may need to clarify( i think they are for the slushbox) so power fc wont support them anyway

* Throttle sensor output signal (Says to A/T C/U)

* Throttle valve switch power supply

* Intake air output signal (Says to A/T C/U)

* Engine A/T control input signal

Edited by SirRacer

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...