Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Thought I might start the official dyno day thread,

This was the first dyno day I've ever attended and I had a great time and found it a great learning experience. I made 131.9kw on my stock 32gtst, which I'm pretty happy with as I was expecting about 110/120ish, everything seems to be healthy :D

I don't have any pics or videos unfortuantly because I forgot the camera so lets see everyone elses :)

Post up your results and tell us how you did.

Thanks to the guys who organised this, and racingline performance :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/117704-dyno-day-wrap-up/
Share on other sites

Yeah i was a great day....

It was my first time on the dyno also .

I never expected a lot so was not freaked out at 135kw.on a stock R33 sedan (auto)

It gives me plenty to do now. Spending some $$$ might be a good start.

Let me say thank you to the guys down at RACINGLINE MOTORSPORT. and the other organisers

......................................................................Cheers

100_3321.MOV

First let me give a big thanks to Nigel and his friend (sorry didn't get your name), at RACINGLINE, for holding the dyno day. Great guys and great new w/shop, wish you both a prosperous future in you new endeavour.

The day was a huge success, with cars on the dyno continuously. Met a few new guys and hope to see you all at our cruises/events.

On a personal note; i stayed till the last car and left with a grin from ear to ear :). Due to my 19's i expected a lowish figure, i knew my tune was dropped to about 250'ish rwkw with 16" rims, so i expected a figure at 230rwkw. The car made 240.Xrwkw, with what was referred to as hugely rich A/R ratios :D. There may not be much power to gain up top, but there is alot to be desired mid-range. After having a chat to Nigel, i stated that "my mechanic probably wanted to keep the engine safe". His reply of the day: "there is safe but yours is just wasting fuel" :(.

I believe i may have made the highest figure for the day, so i am pretty damn happy!

I have decided to give this set-up one more tune, before i install the GT-RS, just to see if i can gain some more response for DECA.

Below is a graph comparing my tune to Pete's, the quality difference in tune is obvious.

post-1811-1147531856.jpg

i think i took home the wooden spoon, with a whopping 96.9 rwkw!

was stoked with such a shit effort... lol!

turns out my cars pumping out hugely lean afr's of 16 :)

apparently it shouldnt even be alive! haha

WHERES MY SPOON DAMNIT!

I came down very early then had to leave :)

First run of the day, my mates HR31 pulled 130rwkw with a Redtop NICS, RB25 turbo @ 10psi

I went on second, made 180rwkw, all going through a big fat auto. Silvertop ECCS, GT2871r @ 16psi...AFR's up the creek :D

Thumbs up to the workshop and Nige who seem like good blokes. I will be definitely going back there to get my SAFC tuned.

Thought I might start the official dyno day thread,

This was the first dyno day I've ever attended and I had a great time and found it a great learning experience. I made 131.9kw on my stock 32gtst, which I'm pretty happy with as I was expecting about 110/120ish, everything seems to be healthy :(

I don't have any pics or videos unfortuantly because I forgot the camera so lets see everyone elses :P

Post up your results and tell us how you did.

Thanks to the guys who organised this, and racingline performance :)

I told you that you'd get 130 :)

good turnout and a fair few new faces, which is always good.

thanks for racingline for putting on the day, the organisers and people who came to the event and helped out. a very sucessful day.

i made 167rwkw and then finally 182rwkw after some more timing which was thrown in. we tried the R33 VCT tuning and there was no noticable difference so it was left as defaults.

thanks for those who helped organise and run the event

i think i took home the wooden spoon, with a whopping 96.9 rwkw!

was stoked with such a shit effort... lol!

turns out my cars pumping out hugely lean afr's of 16 >_<

apparently it shouldnt even be alive! haha

WHERES MY SPOON DAMNIT!

time for a new fuel pump dude! :D

is that what nigel said?

i think i took home the wooden spoon, with a whopping 96.9 rwkw!

was stoked with such a shit effort... lol!

turns out my cars pumping out hugely lean afr's of 16 :D

apparently it shouldnt even be alive! haha

WHERES MY SPOON DAMNIT!

rwkw...

dont you have a gts4? >_<

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...