Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

After purchasing the kit 2 weeks back, i sent it in to get sprayed and fitted, and it came back last nite all done. Im real happy with the look i've got. I didnt want to change the front bar, as i didnt want to lsoe the factory blinkers and spot lights, as i use them heaps, so i ended up getting a front lip, which compliments the front bar. This was supplied from the top guys as Powerplay imports

For the side skirts i went through (www.fibrecrazy.com) to get these, and considering they were fibreglass the fitment was perfect, they didnt need any work to fit them, apart from the sanding. These are veilside E1's.

And finally for the rear pods, they are guniene east bear items, also supplied from Powerplay imports. These guys stock some awesome stuff, and i cant thank them enough for supplying 2 of the 3 items.

It looks pretty good in pics, but in person it looks nuts as you can see the detail. Oh and these were jsut quick snaps this morning before work on my phone, i will take decent pics this wkend :thumbsup:

kit3.jpg

kit2.jpg

kit1.jpg

Edited by mr_crust
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/118358-bodykit-fitted/
Share on other sites

looks really POO!!

lol nah looks very nice mate... when i saw the skirts i was like nOooOOOO not a veilside kit... then realised they looked nothing like VS skirts and i was just blind... S2 33s always look good with a front lip ext. on them... that one more so :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/118358-bodykit-fitted/#findComment-2178475
Share on other sites

well the wheels are 18", and i only purchased them 2months back, so im not getting anything bigger, and as i drive this everyday i dont wanna lose the ride quality.

as for lowering it, im scared to do it, ive had the kit for 1 day and i left my missues place and i already scraped under the frotn lip at stock height, so if i lower it, its only gonna be for show purposes.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/118358-bodykit-fitted/#findComment-2181206
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...