Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I am wondering what the difference is between a Bar & Plate cooler, and a Tube & Fin cooler. I have been talking to a couple of workshops who reckon the Hybrid Tube & Fin coolers are better than the japanese brand name coolers, because the jap ones use a bar & plate design.

The workshop reckons that tube & fin is better because it is physically lighter and flows better. It also allows better flow to the radiator.

I was wondering if anyone else can confirm or deny this and also tell me which is better for cooling capacity.

The Hybrid Tube & fin cooler is $1400 supplied and fitted which I thought was a bit steep, but if it is as good as they make out, then I don't mind paying the extra cash. But is it really that much better than the $400 GKTech kit?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/118512-intercoolers-tube-fin-vs-bar-plate/
Share on other sites

I am wondering what the difference is between a Bar & Plate cooler, and a Tube & Fin cooler. I have been talking to a couple of workshops who reckon the Hybrid Tube & Fin coolers are better than the japanese brand name coolers, because the jap ones use a bar & plate design.

The workshop reckons that tube & fin is better because it is physically lighter and flows better. It also allows better flow to the radiator.

I was wondering if anyone else can confirm or deny this and also tell me which is better for cooling capacity.

The Hybrid Tube & fin cooler is $1400 supplied and fitted which I thought was a bit steep, but if it is as good as they make out, then I don't mind paying the extra cash. But is it really that much better than the $400 GKTech kit?

someone posted in the other thread that tube and fin is good for circuit cars etc, as they experience prolonged periods of power...but for street and drag, bar and plate is fine...

$1400 for a hybrid...ouch

Do a search if you want the full story, in summary……..

Bar and plate cores are good if you do short power bursts, they have more aluminium (weigh more) so they are a better heat soak. But they take longer to cool down. Hence good for drag cars and road cars that get short burst of power then cruise. They do limit the airflow to the radiator more than tube and fin cores.

Tube and fin cores are good for more constant power applications, they weigh less so not as good for instantaneous heat soak. But they shed heat quicker than a bar and plate. Hence good for circuit race cars and cars that see long periods of sustained power.

;) cheers :D

Hi quinny.

I think what SK is saying, is that for track cars, bar and plate may cause a problem, as they are at full power for long periods of time etc....on the street and at the drags, bar and plate would be fine...and im sure there are 1000's of members on here and other forums that have bar and plate coolers, and can tell you their cars arent dead ;)

I am wondering what the difference is between a Bar & Plate cooler, and a Tube & Fin cooler. I have been talking to a couple of workshops who reckon the Hybrid Tube & Fin coolers are better than the japanese brand name coolers, because the jap ones use a bar & plate design.

The workshop reckons that tube & fin is better because it is physically lighter and flows better. It also allows better flow to the radiator.

I was wondering if anyone else can confirm or deny this and also tell me which is better for cooling capacity.

The Hybrid Tube & fin cooler is $1400 supplied and fitted which I thought was a bit steep, but if it is as good as they make out, then I don't mind paying the extra cash. But is it really that much better than the $400 GKTech kit?

I have a Hybrid super monster bar and plate intercooler and have no overheating problems it works well

if ur planing of running a bigger turbo setup and want more HP. go for the bar & plate u will be needing it to cool down the air alot faster than a tube & fin.

for a stokist setup tube & fin is the best way to go. better air flow and less turbo lag.

if ur planing of running a bigger turbo setup and want more HP. go for the bar & plate u will be needing it to cool down the air alot faster than a tube & fin.

for a stokist setup tube & fin is the best way to go. better air flow and less turbo lag.

Rubbish, absolute rubbish, who the hell fed you that load of crap?

Some guy trying to sell you a bar plate intercooler I bet.

Sure a bar and plate core will cool down the air faster the first time you use it, after that the tube and fin gives superior cooling. Sure if you are into drags only, go the bar and plate, as long as you let it cool down between runs.

How many examples would you like of fast Skylines using tube and fin intercoolers. Let’s see;

1. the Gibson GTR’s all used tube and fin intercoolers and they won every meaningful Group A race in Australia for 3 years.

2. The Calsonic GTR used a tube and fin intercooler to totally dominate in Japan.

3. the Mines GTR uses a tube and fin intercooler, the bench mark by which all road/circuit GTR’s are measured

4. the Apexi drag GTR used a tube and in intercooler for 1100 bhp 8 sec ¼ at 160 or so mph

Shall I continue, there are several more pages of examples?

:unsure: cheers :rofl:

Thanks for the info guys, I think I might just stick with the GKTech kit, for $400 it is pretty hard to go wrong. I will probably get someone else to fit it though, coz I am useless at that kind of thing.

Hi quinny, I have sent you a PM regarding the cooler...so if you are in fact confirming as part of the group buy, can you get back to me on that PM?

thanks

bar and plate flow better than tube and fin. if you look in a bar and plate you will see that it just has a smooth end on it. tube and fin have the tubes protruding out a bit and some of the air has to do 2 180 degree turns (bar and plate do 2 90 degree turns) so there is slight turbulence. the best flowing of all it bar and fin (or tube and plate, can't remember which it is). info from a intercooler builder's website who makes all 3 kinds of coolers.

and bar and plate take longer to heat up, but also hold heat and take longer to cool down (as people have said) which is why bar and plate are used in drag cars, and tube and fin used in street/circuit cars.

Edited by mad082
bar and plate flow better than tube and fin. if you look in a bar and plate you will see that it just has a smooth end on it. tube and fin have the tubes protruding out a bit and some of the air has to do 2 180 degree turns (bar and plate do 2 90 degree turns) so there is slight turbulence. the best flowing of all it bar and fin (or tube and plate, can't remember which it is). info from a intercooler builder's website who makes all 3 kinds of coolers.

and bar and plate take longer to heat up, but also hold heat and take longer to cool down (as people have said) which is why bar and plate are used in drag cars, and tube and fin used in street/circuit cars.

Yet more unsubstantiated crapola.

Essentially, unless you are running a full race car, you will be fine with a GKtech which is the best value available at the moment.

I have no temp issues on the racetrack with a Hybrid Monster 800hp cooler.

Yet more unsubstantiated crapola.

Essentially, unless you are running a full race car, you will be fine with a GKtech which is the best value available at the moment.

I have no temp issues on the racetrack with a Hybrid Monster 800hp cooler.

and even better value for money in the group buy ! only $400 :O

lol

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...howtopic=117938

/end shameless plug

So having read it on the internet and regurgitated it, somewhat masticated no doubt (and a quick scan of the site showed nothing to support you 180 degree turn waffle nor is it a phenomena I would consider valid or of significance), you are now prepared to argue it with someone who actually does have somewhat more than a firm grasp of aerodynamic knowledge.

Once you can explain a few basics like settling chambers, von karman vortices, the navier stokes equations, turbulent wall growth or the meaning of a reynolds number I'll be prepared to listen, but I'll point out I'm not discussing with the owners of the website, or an expert in cooler design am I? In fact their website is a bit simple so I suggest searching elsewhere.

Look, learn but don't advise until you know, especially if SK is posting.

this is wat ive always been told in regards to coolers..

bar and plate coolers better but doesnt flow aswell as tube and fin

tube and fin flows better than bar and plate but doesnt cool aswell

yet in saying that was also taught this.. if you can only fit a small intercooler go for a bar and plate due to its cooling aspects

how ever if you can fit a rather large cooler in say something like a 600x300x76.. go for tube and fin for its flowing aspects..

feel free to tell me im wrong n wat not.. but the 400 dollar intercooler kits is a hell of a bargin

funny enough tho.. i run a 600x300x76 bar and plate cooler on front of the silvia.. had it for ages sitting around am looking at getting rid of it and goin a thicker tube and fin item tho

to see how the air could do a 180 deg. turn all you have to do is look into the intercooler. you can see the lip inside there. i'm not arguing that tube and fin are bad. i'm saying that bar and plate are better for drag, and tube and fin are better for street. and if you actually read what SK said and what i have said, i'm saying pretty much the same thing. if anything you sound like you are contradictiong SK more than me, so i think you should "Look, learn but don't advise until you know, especially if SK is posting."

The problem I have is the generalisation, not ALL bar & plate intercoolers flow better than ALL tube and fin intercoolers. To state the obvious, a 600 X 300 X 65 B&P core is not going to flow as well as a 600 X 300 X 150 T&F core. Then you have the poorly made B&P versus the perfectly made T&F.

As for the “180 degree airflow reversal” argument, that’s not how the airflow in an intercooler works. Think of the extensions into the end tanks as ram tubes or splitters, then you are much closer to the true airflow characteristics. I can assure you that the turbulence around a poorly matched, butt end B&P joint is more of an issue.

Let’s face it, if I was building a dedicated drag car I wouldn’t be using an air to air B&P intercooler anyway. Not when I can buy a dry ice to air intercooler with similar internal airflow capacity for a similar price. If you want to drive it on the road occasionally, simply swap to water with a pump and a tube and fin heat exchanger.

Horses for courses as they say..

>_< cheers :P

Edited by Sydneykid

But if you had any understanding of aerodynamics/fluid dynamics you would know that in those regions the air either stagnates or circulates while the primary flow follows streamlines directly into the mouth of the tube. It doesn't do 180 or 90 degree turns so that is a complete lie. Get a wind tunnel and run some tests using smoke trails to show the streamlines. I have, I think I'm suitably qualified to argue the semantics, and I suspect Gary would agree. All you are doing is confusing the issue and misleading readers with untruths, and then attempting to say "yes but I agree". If you agree, and have nothing further of value to add, read it and zip it!!! I'm not saying don't participate, just confirm what you want to write first, and not from a sellers site where they have a conflict of interest.

In fact that protruding tube, properly designed can improve airflow over an orifice with sharply squared edges of an equivalent area. This is basic stuff that a first year engineering student will learn.

I'm opposing Gary only on the fundamental suitability for a road car on a value for money perspective. I've never had engine cooling problems on my track car with a bar and plate 800hp cooler, but I was only doing a max of 7 laps at a time, in fact never noticed a temp spike in either outlet temp from the cooler or engine (well other than the back end when a cooler hose blew dumping flames out the exhaust >_<) but it was a quite a bit larger than the size SK tested. The prices available in dezz's current buy are the best I've seen and most users won't need to split the hair on "can it do 20 laps at full noise without temperature issues."

Which is best is a tough question to answer and the best answer is "It depends."

Have you actually read this that you wrote? I know you wrote it but but have you actually read it and tried to match up with some things called fact and reality.

bar and plate flow better than tube and fin. if you look in a bar and plate you will see that it just has a smooth end on it (Not necessarily). tube and fin have the tubes protruding out a bit and some of the air has to do 2 180 degree turns (bar and plate do 2 90 degree turns) so there is slight turbulence (total BS). the best flowing of all it bar and fin (or tube and plate, can't remember which it is) (I suspect wrong, any takers?). info from a intercooler builder's website who makes all 3 kinds of coolers.

I hope you get my drift here.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1680, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
    • hahah when youtube subscribers are faster than my updates here. Yes some vid from the day is up, here:  Note that as with all track day videos it is boring watching after the bloopers at the start.  The off was a genuine surprise to me, I've literally done a thousand laps around the place and I've never had instability there; basically it rolled into oversteer, slipped, gripped and spat me out. On the way off I mowed down one of the instructor's cones and it sat there all day looking at me with accusing cone eyes as I drove past. 1:13:20 was my fastest lap, and it was in the second session, 3rd lap.  It (or me!) got slower throughout the day as it got hotter.      
×
×
  • Create New...