Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As the title says here is a dyno sheet for a set gt-rs's on a 2.9l gtr engine. It needs bigger injectors as you can see it hasn't fallen over yet. Will post another sheet once the bigger injectors go in.

all the usual mods have been done, including these relavant ones;

gt-rs turbos

uas extrude honed manifolds

ces race style dumps and front pipe

trust tr exhaust

hks 280 10.7 intake, 288 11.0 exhaust cams

1mm o/s intake valves

cnc ported head

cp forged pistons

eagle h beam rods

stroker crank

power fc

z 32 afms

any questions just ask.

this run is at 16 pounds, pump fuel and injectors at max duty cyclepost-9006-1149294536.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/120686-rb26-gt-rs-dyno-result/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Nice result, but as per the above posts I agree that you have more power to come as the curve is still rising.

You have a similar setup to me Gav's Dyno Graph, however note that I have shorter final gears from a GTS4, so a direct km/h comparison isn't possible.

I still have some mixed emotions over the GT-RS terbs, however it is apparent (to me at least) that to get the best from these turbs on a 2.8L you still need to get some serious airflow through the engine. Big revs, high lift/long duration cams (I'm changing my Step 2 264 IN to a 270 duration) and head porting really makes a difference.

Good luck and drop me a PM if you want to chat.

Cheers

Gav

hey guys, to answer some of the questions, its a modified rb 30 crank, eagle rb26 rods, this may sound strange but i dont even know what BP on that dyno chart means (im an engine machinist, and know very little about dyno set up), only just got the car back so not sure what rpm it hits full boost at but ill let you know.

BP is the barometric pressure. The usual is around 101 or there abouts. At a lower atmospheric BP, the engine will make less power due to the decreased density of the air. So with a lower BP, Shootout mode will correct the reading (ie inflate it) to match what the engine would make at roughly 101 (or whatever the Shootout mode considers standard). So like the temperature probe, false readings can give misleading dyno results. Ie low BP = increased power just like high ITs = increased power.

Anyways nice power man, keep up the good work. Once its finalised it must be a real beast, not that it isnt now already! And yeah, more details please!

I modified the crank, so that i could use a 26 block, instead of an rb 30 block, so that all the outside components would fit up with out modification. The pistons are a custom order, with 22mm pin, the only rod modificatonn, is re-bushing to 22mm pin

Very interesting. So I assume you offset ground the crank to de stroke it a bit? Did you hardchrome it first, or are you running custom big end shells?

Was there enough meat in the ringlands to run such a low pin height (and 22mm pins)?

The crank is de-stroked slightly, and heavily modified, using std rb26 shells (rb30 big ends are larger than rb26). Yeah the ring lands are fine, the pin is high, but no higher than on a lot of other long stroke engies. Details on the crank mods sound vague, but i dont have exact measurments of what i did. i made templates of the shapes i made everything so i can do it again, and am in the process of figuring out if i can offer the conversion at an economical price (there are a lot of hours of labour in the modifications). To do all the mods you need a lathe, mill, crank grinder and engine balancer. But should still be able to do something vastly cheaper than japanese alternatives.

Edited by mark99

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • LOL.... a good amount of people (not all) on that continent seem to know everything and like to measure things in bananas, football fields, statue of liberties instead of the metric system lol.
    • I assume the modules are similar enough, so if you've had no issues I don't see why I would. I have tried to find a wiring diagram for the FPCM / fuel pump circuit, but I can't find it anywhere. Otherwise, I would just do some wire cutting and joining at the FPCM and give the 12 V supplied to the FPCM directly to the pump instead. If you know anyone that could help with wiring diagrams, I'd be very happy  
    • If it dies, then bypass. The task isn't difficult. I have one running on a standard R32 FPCM. That's after nearly 20 years of it running an 040, which pull substantially more current than the Walbro. They're not the same module, but I'd hope it indicates that the R33 one should be man enough for the job. I think people kill them when putting proper sized pumps on them, not these little toy pumps we're talking about here.
    • Silicone spray won't hurt anything. And if it does, that's an opportunity to put some solid steel spherical bushings in, so you can really learn what suspension noise sounds like, If you're going to try it, just spray one bush at a time, so you can work out which one is actually noisy. My best guess is that if the noise started only since putting the coilovers in, then it is just noise being transmitted up through the top mounts of the struts, and not necessarily "new" noise from bushes. But it's almost impossible to know.
    • Are you saying the 34 is SUV height, and not that we're talking about an SUV here? (because if we're talking about an SUV, you don't fix them. You just replace them when something breaks. Not worth establishing sufficient emotional connection with an SUV to warrant doing any work on one). I wouldn't jack my car up on a short little loop of 10mm steel rod poking out through a hole in the bumper bar, front or rear end. I realise that we're probably not talking about that type of loop at the front, being the one under/behind the bar on a Skyline.... but even for that one, trying to jack up on what amounts to a thin piece of steel, designed purely for withstanding a horizontal tension force, not a vertical compressive force (and so would be prone to buckling/crushing) and, my most particular bitch about it - located RIGHT AT THE EXTREME FRONT OF THE CAR, applying a load up through the radiator support panel, etc, with almost the entire mass of the car cantilevered between there and the rear wheels? Nope. Not doing that. Not on the regular. That structure out there in front of the front crossmember is not designed to carry load in the vertical direction. Not really designed to carry any load at all, really. The chassis rail that the tow point is connected to would be fine loaded in tension, as per towing. Not intended to carry the mass of the whole car, especially loaded all on one rail, with twisting and all sorts of shitty load distribution going on. No, I will happily drive up on some pieces of wood, thanks. That can only happen on driven wheels, and they are at the other end of the car, and this problem does not exist at that end of the car. And even then, I have been known to drive up on at least 1x piece of 2x8 each side at the rear, simply to reduce the amount of jack pumping necessary to get the car up high enough for the jack stands. What really really shits me about Skylines is the lack of decent places for chassis stands at either end of the car. You'd think they'd be designed into the crossmembers.
×
×
  • Create New...