Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

There seems to be a lot of people who seem to be using the 0-100km/h time as a bench mark for vehicle performance. However, in my experience the 0-100km/h time is not a great reflection. Why is that? Many of the real world traffic light grand prix events are from rest (0km/h) to the speed limit, or just over it (so about 100km/h), so surely this would be the definitive measure of a cars on street performance? Not really, no. I will use an example to illustrate my point.

Three cars line up at the traffic lights. All three cars have an identical 0-100km/h time. For simplicity, let's make it 10 seconds. The speed limit of this road is 100km/h, so it will be a race to the limit. Nothing illegal here :P

Car number one is a concept vehicle (why it's at the lights I don't know...). An electric vehicle. It doesn't make much power (in fact the top speed is only 100km/h), but it is ultra light, and has 4 in-wheel electric motors giving full torque from 0 rpm, meaning it can charge of the line hard. Car number two is a regular family car. The long geared automatic with big six cylinder power means that acceleration is fairly constant throughout the rev range. The final car has a big turbo, front wheel drive, and manual gearbox. This makes it tricky to get off the line, but once it's hooked up and the turbo spooled, the acceleration is very good.

The image below shows a representation of these three cars' acceleration curves. As you can see, all three will hit 100km/h at the exact same moment.

post-18125-1150336377.gif

(for those who care, the electric car's speed was modelled by a quadratic equation speed=-(time-10)^2+100, the family car by a linear equation speed=10xtime, and the turbo by another quadratic equation speed=time^2)

So it's a race to 100km/h, and all three cars have an identical 0-100km/h time, so it should be a pretty close race, right?

WRONG! :P

The hard launching electric car gets the jump from the start, and wins by a full 45m over the family car, and a whopping 90m over the turbo car - that's about 18 car lengths!!!!

post-18125-1150336397.gif

(For those who care, distances were obtained by integrating the speed equations stated earlier. If I made any errors then they were deliberate and hence I don't care - don't bother pointing them out, the electric car would still win ;) )

This is obviously an extreme case, but I think it illustrates my point nicely. 0-100km/h times are stupid.

Edited by Big Rizza
  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

So basically you're saying distance covered in x amount of seconds is more important than 0-100 times...... say, like a 1/4 mile race? ;)

You're right, but you could put money to say that a car that does 0-100 quicker than another cars 0-100 will also cover more distance, hence beat it 9 times out of 10.

In general a car that is quicker over the quater mile usually has a quicker 0-100 as well...................

Big Rizza,

Props for such a well thought out post. you have much more spare time than me ;). That is really something to think about.

I hope I don't get beaten by a ful sik electric car.

i was sitting there thinking your maths was screw up and they would all be the same... until i thought some more. a slightly sideways look at it is to look at quarter mile times and speeds. a mate of mine had a turbo exa that ran a 13.1 at 91mph, while his borther had a natro r31 that ran a 14.0 at 97mph. the exa would get of the line great, but didn't have the puff at high speed to keep pulling, whereas the skyline was hard to launch but had the balls up top to get the speed. so their 0 to 91mph time could've been the same, but the skyline would've done it in less distance.

a better indication of power is rolling starts, like 40 to 80, or 40 to 100. 0 to 100 is too dependant on traction. thats why wrx's have such low numbers, but in rolling starts they get beaten by rwd cars.

I think mention also needs to be made of 0-100 and 400m times for 4WD cars (e.g. GT-R's and WRX's). These rely on redline launches that not only cause serious damage to the gearbox, but are unlikely to occur in everyday drag racing.

I think a more appropriate 0-100 or 400m time would have to include a normal RPM point at which the clutch is released. This would go some length to explaining why an RZ Supra is so much quicker than a GT-R, although they both manage 13 second quarters.

And while we're on the topic of performance figures, I hate hp and kw readouts more than anything else - worse yet because people put so much stock into them. But that's a topic for another post.

So what time will my car do 0-100metres? ;)

I dont have an front mount yet, also what will it do after i install a bov valve?

Can you also tell me how much boost is safe, if i only do 100 metres?

Any help would be appreciated, i tried a search but there were too many answers to my questions.

So i couldnt find any of the right answers i wanted to hear.

Edited by nissky
OK.....so based on your maths, what would the actual quarter mile ET and speed be for all cars?

I chose those formulas with the 0-100km/h sprint in mind, and to extend them outside that will make them less representitive of a real world situation - they are simply too primitive to be extrapolated and still reflect real world situations. Particularly the turbo car, which by the formula will keep on accelerating faster and faster at a rediculous pace, but for the fun of it I will do it anyways :P

Due to the electric car reaching max speed at 100km/h, the after 10 seconds the family car will start closing the gap. Similarly, after 10 seconds, the faster acceleration of the turbo car at high speed means it will start running down both the family car and the electric car.

At the 15.0 second mark, the turbo car will catch the family car.

At the 15.4 second mark, the turbo car will catch the electric car.

At the 15.8 second mark, the family car will catch the electric car.

The turbo car runs a 16.3 at 265.69km/h (see what I mean about unreallistic :D)

The family car runs a 17.0 at 170km/h

The electric car runs a 17.7 at 100km/h

post-18125-1150344395.gif

Whilst the 0-100km/h was a reallistic enough to show what could happen in the real world, this quarter mile situation is unlikely.

Even more unlikely is the turbo's standing kilometer - 22.1 seconds at 490 km/h. :P

EDIT: Oh, and here is the speed graph for the vehicles :P

post-18125-1150344867.gif

And the turbo car does 0-1000km/h in 37.1 seconds, and is accelerating at over 60 g's by that point ;) .

Edited by Big Rizza

Electric cars aren't gay. Have you seen that new Lexus forget what model it is, but's a big v8 with electric engine as well and it goes so damn hard and quite good on fuel for a big v8. They look awesom as well.

I'll try and dig up a website on it.

Electric cars aren't gay. Have you seen that new Lexus forget what model it is, but's a big v8 with electric engine as well and it goes so damn hard and quite good on fuel for a big v8. They look awesom as well.

I'll try and dig up a website on it.

No V8 for the Lexus GS hybrid. It's a V6 with the power of a V8 and the economy of a 4cyl. Apparently.

Dunno if that was what you were referring to... There will probably be a V8 hybrid in the new Lexus LS, but that's not here yet.

Edited by Big Rizza

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Is it alright to top up with just another green coolant?
    • thanks GTSboy. My confusion at the moment is i am trying to locate the ignition, ECU battery power and the ECU negative The closest thing i can find is the for the S15 on Page 8 of the Wiring Specialties web page https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9F33_M_GgENQnZ6STMxVmVNd1E/view?resourcekey=0-eZ4nNRwRoqa1qvKlWWHm8A I cannot find the same diagram for the R33 RB25DET Series 2 dash plug pin out.... Do you know what the Pins? or know where i can find the same pinout diagram for the RB dash plug? Thanks for the advice on the box... i like a 6 speed so might be on the lookout or the box now.. a topic of discussion for another post...
    • Will have a look at that. I cant see any leaks 
    • Put another overflow bottle (ie, a 1.25 coke bottle or similar) under the overflow hose and see if it is being pushed out there or if it is disappearing into the engine.
    • Staring on a stand is no issue. You just have to wire everything up, give it fuel and cross your fingers that the stand is robust enough. Arranging the inlet plumbing is often the hardest part, without any surrounding structure to hand some of it from. No need for coolant if you only want to run it for <1 minute. As to the gearbox - I think the little Aisin box is a bit stronger than the other small Nissan boxes that went behind SRs, but I wouldn't be too keen to test its limits with the torque of a boosted 25. I don't know if you can retain the box and the tailshaft. The box won't connect to the RB without an adapter of some sort, which is either a plate that will push the engine forward (which is not good for fitting it into the bay's available space) or push the box back, which messes with the box position and tailshaft length - OR - cut and shut work on the bellhousing, which is a long way from "least modification". I'd be buying a new 370Z 6 speed or similar, doing what has to be done to that to make it fit RB (ie, cut and shut bellhousing) and the requisite tailshaft custom/mods.
×
×
  • Create New...