Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yeah tottally agree with you mate, and not forgetting this is a GTS4 so more losses in the drive train compared to a GTS-T and from what I understand The gtrs is still fairly efficent over 18psi.

I want one!!!

not sure how much drivetrain loss there is as it was run in rwd...i read somewhere that drivetrain loss is about 17% so that would make it 252kw at the flywheel?

the cheapest prices on GTRS kits are on ns.com and nengun.com...

  • Replies 121
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I had my car tuned at Dr Drifts as well about a fortnight ago. Full 3" zorst, FMIC, fuel pump, GT2871r @ 16psi it made 183rwkw, no cams. This was all through a bit shift kitted VLT auto though...with a manual I would expect it to be slightly higher

Mines a 400hp spec GT2871r

have you got a dyno sheet? be interesting to see the midrange power....is yours the .64 or .86 exhaust housing?

Cool. so lookign forward to swapping keys at DECA. Forget dyno figures see how they drive back to back...plsu Dr Drifts dyno seems pretty lazy. Roll on DECA :)

would be interesting to see how your set up goes on this dyno...there should be a dyno day at DrDrifts in a few months time......time for a few myths to be busted :O

yeah, i was talkin to sam when he was in adelaide and he used a sorta low reading dyno here and i asked him about it and he said his dyno reads even lower.

and drive trains dont lose a percentage of your total power, they lose a static amount of power (but different amounts in different gears and depends on rim size(weight) etc)

Edited by salad

i fitted the 56t version, but slightly bigger front wheel spec (compared to gtrs) gt2871r to my s15. Hoping to get it tuned in the next couple of days. I know its not a rb20 but its still 2l capacity. Im on full boost @ 4000rpm if not earlier. Car keeps pulling all the way. Im hoping for 220rwkw @ 1.2bar

ok people, here it is a HKS GTRS on a RB20 - 215rwkw using 18psi.

i have put the dyno graph in the Rb20 dyno results thread with all my mods...but here it is anyway:

gallery_1619_111_139978.jpg

The blue line is my old R34 GTT highflow turbo, was pretty laggy in comparison...now the difference in response is huge, i now have a 50% increase in power at 110kmh :whistling:

All comments are welcome!

A clear demonstration of the benefits of increasing area under the curve, even if the max figure is not greatly changed in percentage terms.

The thing that is prominent to me is the shape of curve difference between 90-120km/h. Gone from concave (ski jump) section, to convex (hump) section. It looks like a big indicator of response, possibly related to the size of the turbine housing (R34 vs HKS)?

The full load dyno curve might show the difference in power, but I get the impression that power is only a small portion of the story. Transient response is where it's at for me!! Proof is in the driving no doubt.

Looks like it was money well spent.

cheers

Dale

Just out of curiousity what causes the power to drop off after 5700 ish rpm, I thought being a bigger a/r then stock it would allow better flow up top. Or is this just more a characteristic of the head/cams etc?

Either way looks like a very nice upgrade over stock.

A clear demonstration of the benefits of increasing area under the curve, even if the max figure is not greatly changed in percentage terms.

The thing that is prominent to me is the shape of curve difference between 90-120km/h. Gone from concave (ski jump) section, to convex (hump) section. It looks like a big indicator of response, possibly related to the size of the turbine housing (R34 vs HKS)?

The full load dyno curve might show the difference in power, but I get the impression that power is only a small portion of the story. Transient response is where it's at for me!! Proof is in the driving no doubt.

Looks like it was money well spent.

cheers

Dale

Hey Dale,

your right, the difference is even more noticable when driving, I think full boost is reached about 4100rpm in 4th gear :O

the R34 housing is visibly bigger than the HKS exhaust housing. If the HKS exhaust housing is .64 then what is the R34 one?

In summary: Definitely money well spent :(

Rolls Posted Today, 08:54 PM

Just out of curiousity what causes the power to drop off after 5700 ish rpm, I thought being a bigger a/r then stock it would allow better flow up top. Or is this just more a characteristic of the head/cams etc?

Either way looks like a very nice upgrade over stock.

Hey dude, the rpm on the graph was not calibrated so don't go by that, the KM/h are accurate though. So power drops off more like 6400rpm, and i think thats because of the stock cams....maybe someone else can add to this....?

Just out of curiousity what causes the power to drop off after 5700 ish rpm, I thought being a bigger a/r then stock it would allow better flow up top. Or is this just more a characteristic of the head/cams etc?

Either way looks like a very nice upgrade over stock.

Could be a few things... I would measure manifold pressure before throwing cams etc at it.

Its not only the a/r but also the turbine wheel size that determines exhaust flow ability.

An example of this is the GT30r 1.06 and GT35r .82, the turbine maps both flow roughly the same.

Also.. regarding the power run.... Can I ask why the difference in correction between the two runs. 1.13 vs 2.71. None the less power is roughly the same down low so the different correction values clearly make bugger all difference.

the R34 housing is visibly bigger than the HKS exhaust housing. If the HKS exhaust housing is .64 then what is the R34 one?

The local turbo dude down here in Adelaide said he's checked a few out and they appear to be a .7 something.

He also mentioned there's no listing of them anywhere so unless he cuts one up its difficult to get an exact measurement. But he was certian they are a .7 something. :(

The R34 turbine housing is the same as the late model VG30 turbine housing.

Also.. regarding the power run.... Can I ask why the difference in correction between the two runs. 1.13 vs 2.71. None the less power is roughly the same down low so the different correction values clearly make bugger all difference.

hey cubes,

i have no idea about the correction values on this dyno, maybe because the ambient temperatures between the 2 runs were quite different it compensates for it? as you can see on the chart, that the old turbo run was done on the 3rd Feb so it was a while back...

Yer either way the off boost power reading is basically the same so nothing to worry about.. Thought I'd ask anyway incase you had some interesting info to share on the correction values. :(

But yes very nice... Now settle it in for a while then ....... 22 maybe squeeze 24psi in to her. :O

the guy from horsepower in a box told me the stock vg30 (R34) housing is around 0.70, so that would most likely explain the comin onto boost heaps later etc

yeah, that would confirm what cubes said, so that explains where most of the lag came from :(

ok people, here it is a HKS GTRS on a RB20 - 215rwkw using 18psi.

gallery_1619_111_139978.jpg

We have a winner. Thw GT-RS . Based on the fact that ppl typically say his dyno reads low, and a quick comparison is...

At 90km/h i have 72rwkws you have 65rwkws.

At 110km/h I have 150rwkws, you have 150rwkws :D

At 130km/h i have 210rwkws, you have 190rwkws.

At 150km/h i have 234rwkws you have 217rwkws.

At 170km/h i have 235rwkws you have 200rwkws.

So allowing for the fact that his dyno reads low, its looks like the GT-RS tracks about the same as 20G but with more down low....and about the same top end (we are running the same boost)

To me its making the same numbers as my setup without all the agro of manifold and gate...so its a bolt on winner :(

The only thing that seems to fly in the face of my results is the way the power falls away. Do you run cam gears? I will look at what mine are set to in the morning...lol oh, thats about now. Time to put down the scotch glass and go to bed ;)

Yep definately looks like this turbo is a winner, i've got half a power run on 18psi with my 56T GT2871/vg30 due to a blown headgasket and a dodgy dyno operator, but my power readings are very similar up to 130kph with the 2.4l and much bigger exhaust housing.

90kph i have 75rwkw

110kph i have 140rwkw

and 130kph where it was shut down i have 212rwkw

doesnt really look like its slowing down at all on my graph and with 15psi and a rb25 turbine housing before the HG went it made 230rwkw.

it will be interesting to see just how much the vg30 turbine housing and 56t comp wheel opens up the top end.

Edited by kwazza11
Yep definately looks like this turbo is a winner, i've got half a power run on 18psi with my 56T GT2871/vg30

it will be interesting to see just how much the vg30 turbine housing and 56t comp wheel opens up the top end.

I think you have got the difference in characteristics nailed:

top end flow, at the expense of low end/mid range. Depending on what you actually want the car to do, that ski jump mid range can make it tiresome, if exciting to drive.

I agree, it will be interesting to see the extent of the differences. Bear in mind the first upgrade Interloper was running shared the same spec VG30/R34 housing you want to use.

FWIW, I suspect the 56T cartridge is just a little too large for a responsive match to RB25, let alone an RB20. While the RB20/25 spec turbine housing would keep the results biased towards mid range, the larger A/R R34 unit wouldn't allow the assembly to respond quickly. Keen to see your results though.

cheers

Edited by Dale FZ1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Update 3: Hi all It's been a while. Quite a lot of things happened in the meantime, among other things the car is (almost) back together and ready to be started again. Things that I fixed or changed: Full turbo removal, fitting back the OEM turbo oil hardlines. Had to do quite a bit of research and parts shopping to get every last piece that I need and make it work with the GT2860 turbos, but it does work and is not hard to do. Proves that the previous owner(s) just did not want to. While I was there I set the preload for the wastegates to 0,9bar to hopefully make it easier for the tuner to hit the 370hp I need for the legal inspections that will follow later on. Boost can always go up if necessary. Fitted a AN10 line from the catch can to the intake hose to make the catchcan and hopefully the cam covers a slight vacuum to have less restrictive oil returns from the head and not have mud build up as harshly in the lines and catch can. Removed the entire front interior just shy of the dashboard itself to clean up some of the absolutely horrendous wiring, (hopefully) fix the bumpy tacho and put in LED bulbs while I was there. Also put in bulbs where there was none before, like the airbag one. I also used that chance to remove the LED rpm gauge on the steering column, which was also wired in absolute horror show fashion. Moved the 4in1 Prosport gauge from sitting in front of the OEM oil pressure gauge to the center console vents, I used a 3D printed vent piece to hold that gauge there. The HKB steering wheel boss was likely on incorrectly as I sometimes noticed the indicator reset being uneven for left vs. right. In the meantime also installed an airbag delete resistor, as one should. Installed Cube Speed premium short shifter. Feels pretty nice, hope it'll work great too when I actually get to drive. Also put on a fancy Dragon Ball shift knob, cause why not. My buddy was kind enough to weld the rust hole in the back, it was basically rusted through in the lowermost corner of the passenger side trunk area where the wheel arch, trunk panel and rear quarter all meet. Obviously there is still a lot of crustiness in various areas but as long as it's not rusted out I'll just treat and isolate the corrosion and pretend it's not there. Also had to put down a new ground wire for the rear subframe as the original one was BARELY there. Probably a bit controversial depending on who you ask about this... but I ended up just covering the crack in the side of the engine block, the one above the oil feed, with JB Weld. I used a generous amount and roughed up the whole area with a Dremel before, so I hope this will hold the coolant where it should be for the foreseeable future. Did a cam cover gasket job as the half moons were a bit leaky, and there too one could see the people who worked on this car before me were absolute tools. The same half moons were probably used like 3 times without even cleaning the old RTV off. Dremeled out the inside of the flange where the turbine housing mates onto the exhaust manifolds so the diameter matches, as the OEM exhaust manifolds are even narrower than the turbine housings as we all know. Even if this doesn't do much, I had them out anyways, so can't harm. Ideally one would port-match both the turbo and the manifold to the gasket size but I really didn't feel up to disassembling the turbine housings. Wrapped turbo outlet dumps in heat wrap band. Will do the frontpipe again as well as now the oil leak which promted me to tear apart half the engine in the first place is hopefully fixed. Fitted an ATI super damper to get rid of the worn old harmonic balancer. Surely one of the easiest and most worth to do mods. But torquing that ARP bolt to spec was a bitch without being able to lock the flywheel. Did some minor adjustments in the ECU tables to change some things I didn't like, like the launch control that was ALWAYS active. Treated rusty spots and surface corrosion on places I could get to and on many spots under the car, not pretty or ideal but good enough for now. Removed the N1 rear spats and the carbon surrounding for the tailpipe to put them back on with new adhesive as the old one was lifting in many spots, not pretty. Took out the passenger rear lamp housing... what do you know. Amateur work screwed me again here as they were glued in hard and removing it took a lot of force, so I broke one of the housing bolts off. And when removing the adhesive from the chassis the paint came right off too. Thankfully all the damaged area won't be visible later, but whoever did the very limited bodywork on this car needs to have their limbs chopped off piece by piece.   Quite a list if I do say so myself, but a lot of time was spent just discovering new shit that is wrong with the car and finding a solution or parts to fix it. My last problem that I now have the headache of dealing with is that the exhaust studs on the turbo outlets are M10x1.25 threaded, but the previous owner already put on regular M10 nuts so the threads are... weird. I only found this out the hard way. So now I will just try if I can in any way fit the front pipe regardless, if not I'll have to redo the studs with the turbos installed. Lesson learned for the future: Redo ALL studs you put your hands on, especially if they are old and the previous owners were inept maniacs. Thanks for reading if you did, will update when the engine runs again. Hope nothing breaks or leaks and I can do a test drive.
    • No those pads are DBA too  but they have colors too. I look at the and imo the green "street" are the best.
    • I’m not sure what happened I told them about sonic tunes free OTS tune and the next the I know .. I was booted..   To funny 
    • Yea - I mean I've seen my fuel pump which is decades old and uh, while I'm not saying this with real knowledge... but I sure get the ick at using anything in the fuel system that produced the state of that pump. Many years ago I went through multiple pumps (and strainers) before I dropped the tank to clean it out with extreme violence. I'm talking the car would do maybe 50km before coming to a halt, which resulted in me cleaning out the filter with some brake cleaner and going on my way. None of my stuff ever looked like what came out of your fuel tank. I don't think I'd be happy with it unless every single component was replaced (or at least checked/cleaned/confirmed to be clean here).
    • I'm not going to recommend an EBC pad. I don't like them. Just about anything else would suit me better. I've been using Intima pads for a while now.
×
×
  • Create New...