Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Dropping the filter at 5k is a waste of time IMO. Unless you've got problems with your motor, it wouldnt even be 20% full of debris. Actually the longer you leave the filter on, its single pass efficiency increases (ie the better it actually filter out small particles) so I say, leave it on!

Image13.gif

EDIT - I like this summary: "When time comes to change the oil at 3000-5000 miles they may just be getting in to their most effective part of their life cycle. Hence they never function optimally, or spent far less time in that range where small particle filtering is most effective."

Edited by Busky2k

Yep 300V has a stout additive package + high quality ester base oil = excellent recipe. Good thing its cheaper than Redline too. But for your average Skyline its wayyy overkill.

Beer Baron, when you do the UOA, make sure they test for all the elements Mo/Zn/Ca etc. TBN would be nice too.

Edited by Busky2k

Hmm I'll debate changing the filter ever 10,000. Personally I change it every 5000 kays as if I let it go to 10,000 I start to get noise from my lifters on startup due to them not getting oil fast enough. If that's not a indication of restriction nothing is.

I'm using the 4100 turbolight in my engine. I only leave it in for 5,000 kays myself. It is probably good for a fair bit more, but I like to make sure.

^^ Some filters use a poor quality anti-drain back valve to hold oil in the filter upon shutdown. I've seen countless Ryco ones do this after a while. Nissan OEM ones I have been good in this respect. Good filters use a silicone gasket (Eg Purolator PureOne) which lasts much longer. You can tell by if it has an orange valve at the bottom instead of black (ordinary nitrile rubber)

If the filter is clogged it goes into bypass so you wouldn't be able to tell if it was clogged or not without a pressure gauge plumbed in before and after the oil filter. And even then its difficult to tell.

I think this thread should be put in the maintenance section lol.

Thanks to the advice from Busky, i now use a pure one oil filter and castrol edge 0w 40 best change i did from the 10w 60 edge. Motor is running cooler and starts better,

And in the gearbox i run redline shock proof its well worth it.

Edited by subzeroR33
^^ Some filters use a poor quality anti-drain back valve to hold oil in the filter upon shutdown. I've seen countless Ryco ones do this after a while. Nissan OEM ones I have been good in this respect. Good filters use a silicone gasket (Eg Purolator PureOne) which lasts much longer. You can tell by if it has an orange valve at the bottom instead of black (ordinary nitrile rubber)

If the filter is clogged it goes into bypass so you wouldn't be able to tell if it was clogged or not without a pressure gauge plumbed in before and after the oil filter. And even then its difficult to tell.

I think this thread should be put in the maintenance section lol.

Well you got me there mate. Yes I do use a Ryco, guilty as charged. Interesting little piece of info there. I think I'd better invest in a genuine filter, always assumed they would be too expensive since everything else that the dealers sell is :happy:. Oil change will be due in a couple weeks. Will get 1 for sure now & try it out.

Yeah I have a personal vendetta against Ryco. I mean what kind of company charges well over $10 for a filter and can't even put a plastic seal over the end? Go wipe your finger on the base plate of a Ryco off the shelf and look at the crap thats on your finger. Lovely.

I believe Purolator's Premium Plus or PureOnes are far better than Ryco's offerings. Nissan are good aswell but the price varies. My local dealer wants $19 for one, where as I've heard others get em for $9! For $15, the Purolator PureOne is a better choice for the money.

Busky2k,

Head down to nissan they are around $8.98 or soemthing from memory, thats what my last one set me back.

I grabbed one to check it out, they do look very good quality and have a strange lip type seal.

However, I will be going back to the pureone filters.

post-382-1154657446.jpg

post-382-1154657454.jpg

$10 for an OEM? You must have a nice dealer. Main North Nissan want $19 for em lol. Then again the NVCS SR20 has a different thread to the RB so thus the part numbers are different. (and I believe most other post 1995 Nissans use the same filter)

And as everyone can see, the Nissan one has an orange ADBV, so its silicone and thus high quality. Good stuff. :D Not sure about that funny lip though, but it must work because the OEM one had one of the fastest times to get oil pressure after start up. Good ol Ryco was like 3 seconds lol.

Just called my local Nissan..

Village Nissan

425 Elizabeth Ave

Redcliffe, QLD, 4020

(07)3883 0900

While he was looking up the part number that CUBES posted a picture of *15208-H8911AU*, he was making small talk about what I do for work.

When I told him I worked for QPS he made a joke and said “Oh I better give you a discount so you don’t send your work mates here aye”

Anyway, he ended up giving me a discount anyway..

He can supply them for $7.70

I’ll head on over to see him this Saturday.

If there are other QLD’ers that would be interested in the future, or now I guess, I might have a chat to him and see if he can do this for this price all the time for the car club.

Busky2k,

Head down to nissan they are around $8.98 or soemthing from memory, thats what my last one set me back.

I grabbed one to check it out, they do look very good quality and have a strange lip type seal.

However, I will be going back to the pureone filters.

The actual Nissan part number for R32, R33 (RB25DET, RB26DETT) should be AY100-NS007 (15208-H8911) but has been supersede by AY100-NS005 which is used by R34 so both can be used.

  • 5 weeks later...

good info.

I just used a Ryco and also thought it was kinda crap not having the seal on it. I did my FTO also and got a OEM one and it was a silicone one also...

damn...should have read this earlier...read up pplz!!

The oil filter sit shigher than the sum yeah?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • HyperGear. Just get a high flow of the stocker. Good, reliable, and should bolt on. Yes it will want things like a retune once done, so you need to factor this in to your spend too.
    • Hi. Iam looking for some "cheaper" bolt on turbo on RB25DET NEO. I do not want "big" power just better reliability than the stock turbo which is "fot now" good but is old and i do not think it has "easy" life. One the Skyline here running some "temu" china Turbo but i dont trust those... Thanks!  
    • Hi guys, Making some space/cleaning up. A whole heap of random OEM R33 GTR parts and other random bits and bobs. I will update this thread as I go. Parts are located in Moorebank NSW 2170. Pickup preferred but will post at buyers expense. Prices are negotiable. If they don’t sell it will go in the bin. Item 1: BOV return pipe. $40 Item 2: RB26 cam gears. $20 Item 3: R33 GTR torque split, oil temp, boost centre gauge. $100 Item 4: RB26 fuel rail x 2. $20 each Item 5: RB26 Recirc valves. $50 Item 6: OEM upper front arms. $20 Item 7: Royal Purple Max Gear 75w-140 1 quart/946 ml x 5. $50 each or 5 for $200. Item 8: OS Giken 80w-250 diff oil 1 litre. $25 Item 9 Eibach springs. ers-11-140-60-0140. $100 https://www.streetfx.com.au/eib140-60-0060-eibach-ers-140mm-length-x-60mm-id-coil-over-spring?_ga_campaignid=22235933977&_ga_adgroupid=180146800292&_ga_keyword=&_ga_device=m&_ga_target=pla-295238231169&_ga_locint=&_ga_locphy=9071723&_ga_matchtype=&_ga_network=g&_ga_device=m&_ga_placement=&_gcl_id=CjwKCAjwlt7GBhAvEiwAKal0cvkVE_hstv24cDiaICsIk1oznH9zAoJf3By6vR3Tpe7jmByqM6JFHBoCZYAQAvD_BwE&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=22235933977&gbraid=0AAAAADPiTbo1xAuvnjIWWYnezivf-BUSY&gclid=CjwKCAjwlt7GBhAvEiwAKal0cvkVE_hstv24cDiaICsIk1oznH9zAoJf3By6vR3Tpe7jmByqM6JFHBoCZYAQAvD_BwE    
    • That's kind of what I was getting at saying you'd be here soon regarding length etc being able to add additional restriction.  My assumption (possible donkeys of you and mption) is that the length of hose to an oil cooler, and back, isn't going to be that huge of a loss. Typically you're talking about 1.5m of total length. And so far everyone in our world hasn't had issues with oil not being able to get to a cooler and back, it's more been, how the heck do we get the oil out of the head and back down to the bottom? I'd nearly hazard a guess the biggest issue people have with oil cooling and oil supply, is being able to get the heat out at the cooler itself (not enough air flow, too small of a cooler etc) Also, when people mount them wrong and make really awesome air traps so they've dramatically diminished the cooling capacity.
    • I will rebutt this and the preceding point from Dose....but without doing any calcs to demonstrate anything and without knowing that I am right or wrong. But... The flow capacity of a fluid transfer system is not limited by the smallest orifice or section of conduit in that system, unless it is drastically smaller than the rest of the system. OK, I use the word drastically perhaps with too much emphasis, but let's drill down on what I really mean. The flow capacity of the system is the result of the sum of the restrictions of the entire system. So, to make an extreme example, if you have a network with 3" pipe everywhere (and let's say a total length of only a few metres) and that 12mm ID restriction of the oil filter connection being the obvious restriction, then for any given amount of pressure available, the vast majority of all the pressure drop in the system is going to occur in the 12mm restriction. But.... increase the length of the 3" pipeline to, say 1000m, and suddenly the pipe pressure loss will likely add up to either be in the same order of magnitude, possibly even exceeding that of the 12mm restriction. Now the 12mm restriction starts to matter less. Translate this to the actual engine, actual oil cooler hose sizing, etc etc, and perhaps: The pressure loss caused by flowing through the narrow section (being the 12mm oil filter port, and perhaps any internal engine oil flow pathways associated with it) is a certain number. The pressure loss through, say, -12 hoses out to the cooler and back is negligible, but The pressure loss through -10 hoses out to the cooler, at the exact same length as the above, starts to become a decent fraction of the loss through the 12mm stuff at the filter port. Maybe even it starts to exceed it. I could actually do these calcs if I knew 1) how much oil was actually flowing in the line, 2) gave enough of a f**k to do things that I hate doing for work, voluntarily for a hypothetical discussion. Anyway - I reiterate. It's not the narrowest port that necessarily determines how much it can all flow. It is the sum. A long enough length of seemingly fat enough pipe can still cause more loss than a semmingly dominant small bore restriction.
×
×
  • Create New...