Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Seems a little different to other Series 2's

Please Pm me as well if not to much hassle

ECR33-133451

GGKBRTFR33VDAAA-AA

Ant info would be awsome

Thanks

this vin kept coming up with errors, but the model code showed this:

post-34711-1244612803_thumb.jpg

post-34711-1244613094_thumb.jpg

Thanks for that,

One question, how will I know if it's V-spec or not - I remember someone told me 'W' on model number indicates it's V-spec, is this right?

Cheers

Grant

Hi,

Was given this vin for a 93 R32 GTR:

6t91mpaaapxavh008

Has no 6U9000 infront.

Eng no: is rb26003690a

Unfortunately that's one of the ones where they just made up a new aussie VIN rather than the usual prefixing the jap one with 6U90000. You're gonna need to get the jap VIN off the firewall, as there's nothing we can do from the engine no or aussie VIN (my 33 was the same...).

Unfortunately that's one of the ones where they just made up a new aussie VIN rather than the usual prefixing the jap one with 6U90000. You're gonna need to get the jap VIN off the firewall, as there's nothing we can do from the engine no or aussie VIN (my 33 was the same...).

Ok, guess ill have to get the one on the firewall.

Thanx for your help :)

Note that you can feed the following web page your Aus VIN & RAWS approval Plate # to get the particulars on the complaince process for your car:

http://raws.dotars.gov.au/rawswebpublic/RAWPubVehSearch.asp

Like most of us, you probably have a version that pre-dates the '35.

However there are some who have passed the tests and been granted the next level

:)

soz dude, bit off topic... but is your dr30 the one that was in parked in front of turbo tune recently?

*grumbles about wasting 2.2gb of his 100gb on junk*

Guess I can help out others!

So there is a newer version floating around? The stag I'm trying to search is only a 2001 and this listing said 2005!

You need to speak to someone who has the later version of FAST for advice on that one - 2.2GB sounds a bit small.

soz dude, bit off topic... but is your dr30 the one that was in parked in front of turbo tune recently?

Nope - it was entered in AJD though.

:)

Thanks for that,

One question, how will I know if it's V-spec or not - I remember someone told me 'W' on model number indicates it's V-spec, is this right?

Cheers

Grant

Anyone know the answer to this?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...