Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Finally got all my parts in and took the car to the dyno and the results were less than I expected (although, isn't that always the case :(). I was under the assumption that the HKS GT2530s would spool much much faster than they did and I was expecting around 450 whp. Let me know what you guys think..

A/F ratios: started off weak but were spot on after moving around the fuel map and we peaked injector duty at only 74%.

Boost: we went up to 1.4 bar to play it safe on the GT2530s, and when it finally got to full boost, it held steady there moving around +/- .2 bar.

Power Mods:

2 x HKS GT2530 Turbos

2 x 300zx MAFs

Ogura Twin Plate Clutch

Greddy Front Mount Intercooler

Sard 722cc Fuel Injectors

Sard 276lph Fuel Pump

NGK Iridium Racing Spark Plugs

Apexi PowerFC Stand Alone Engine Management

Apexi PowerFC Boost Control Kit

Apexi PowerFC Commander

Greddy dual dump pipe /w decat

Apexi exhaust damper control

5Zigen Exhaust

Notes: Dyno sheet is in yankee hp not aussie :). It was done on a RWD dyno with AWD fuse pulled, no AWD ones around here. Normal pump fuel was used the whole time.

Not sure why it's showing the image as dead below, but it opens when you click it.

post-12197-1155506460.jpg

Edited by berzerkled

is there a graph with boost pressure against RPM? torque peak at 6500 seems to be like it's very laggy, guessing it doesn't hit full boost until after 5500.

Thanks for the replys guys..

CAMs and what is normal fuel over there. we use 98 or 100 RON over here.

The 91 I was using is spot on to your 99.

is there a graph with boost pressure against RPM? torque peak at 6500 seems to be like it's very laggy, guessing it doesn't hit full boost until after 5500.

I don't have any sort or graph, but yeah full boost was very very slow. I'm thinking it's one of three things:

1) I have the PowerFC (PFC Boost Control Kit installed) set for 1.4 bar @ only 60% duty, should I bump up the % and lower the boost I'm asking for?

2) The actuators are way off on the turbos for whatever reason and just need to be tightened? I don't know if the gt2530 actuators can even be tightened..

3) Boost leak?

I really have no clue on this one, just throwing some ideas out there.

Thanks again guys.

Edited by berzerkled
they use 91 octane, there premium is around 94. Still far to laggy something must be wrong

Their octane ratiung however is calculated on RON+MON/2, whereas ours is just RON.

American 91 octane is basically equivilant to our 98 octane, and the 94 octane well surpasses out premium fuels.

Edited by Amaru

Well something is definatly wrong.. I just did a 13.09 @ 105mph in the quarter mile, with a peak boost of 1.35 bar and everything appeared fine on my Apexi Commander.

So my only 2 thoughts on what could be wrong:

1) The actuators are way off on the turbos for whatever reason and just need to be tightened? I don't know if the gt2530 actuators can even be tightened..

2) Boost leak?

Any ideas?

we saw 404awkw (540awhp) on pump gas with a similar set-up and over 450awkw on race fuel...what total timing are you running?? with correct camshaft selection and tuning there is no reason why you shouldn't crack 350awkw (470awhp)

AFAIK Mustang Dyno's read pretty damn low?

The 1/4 mile dyno didn't lie though 13.09 @ 105 MPH

our car was the test car in HPI way back when it was bog stock and i think Ben Ellis managed to reel off back to back 12.9's

we saw 404awkw (540awhp) on pump gas with a similar set-up and over 450awkw on race fuel...what total timing are you running?? with correct camshaft selection and tuning there is no reason why you shouldn't crack 350awkw (470awhp)

I'm on stock cams and cam gears. I know that will slow spool but it shouldn't be nearly this bad.

The 1/4 mile dyno didn't lie though 13.09 @ 105 MPH

our car was the test car in HPI way back when it was bog stock and i think Ben Ellis managed to reel off back to back 12.9's

I had another GTR last year and pulled nearly the same time as this one..which has the hks 2530s.. this doesn't add up.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...