Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys

I recently put in some 800cc injectors, bosch 044 fuel pump and regulator, and the car is smoking more than my grandmother.

I need a ECU, what should i choose, the Haltech ecu or the Apexi FC.

And where and how much could i get an Apexi fc fitted and installed and tuned from.

And if i put in the Apexi could i be running 18 pounds boost, i now its possible with the haltech with no problem, i was wondering would the apexi do the same.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/131093-haltech-v-apexi-power-fc/
Share on other sites

the pro's will kick in with much better info but my basic understanding is

they both should be able to produce the same tuned power as per tuner knowledge and ability but the Power FC being much easier to intergrate as in plug and Play.

Edited by ishh

1) Pick a workshop/tuner

2) Talk to them about what ECU they are most comfortable with.

3) Then purchase that.

Your car will only ever be as good as its tuner.

Definately though... get out of your mind "will it be good at 18psi". Boost is totally irrelevant.

Its an ECU, its tuneable. It can be tuned to cope with whatever you desire to run the package at :D

cheers

  • Like 1
1) Pick a workshop/tuner

2) Talk to them about what ECU they are most comfortable with.

3) Then purchase that.

Your car will only ever be as good as its tuner.

Definately though... get out of your mind "will it be good at 18psi". Boost is totally irrelevant.

Its an ECU, its tuneable. It can be tuned to cope with whatever you desire to run the package at :D

cheers

The problem with that is that the garage will be promoting there product, i have been to micks motorsport, and he is saying Haltech all the way, my uncle done his rexy there, but i have been hearing that apexi is better.

Would anyone now where i could get an apexi installed and everything and for roughly how much. In sydney, im near micks in condell park.

Edited by the_game
The problem with that is that the garage will be promoting there product, i have been to micks motorsport, and he is saying Haltech all the way, my uncle done his rexy there, but i have been hearing that apexi is better.

Would anyone now where i could get an apexi installed and everything and for roughly how much. In sydney, im near micks in condell park.

there are a few place around that area you can talk to. try Just engine managment, hitman, CRD and cresent motorsports they are all in the area give them a call or go down and see them.

I have a PowerFC and pretty happy with it... seems to be more common and well known.

I keep wondering about the Haltech, as it seems to have more features, software/firmware is kept up-to-date and can drive more external things like NOS, wide-band O2 sensor support, etc. Plus manuals are in English.

Would be worth getting more opinions.

Edited by Color_Of_Green

yeah installed is zero, plug and play takes 5 minutes to install.

self idle learn procedure takes 20 minutes to do by yourself and your away.

i would expect double the load points and features from the haltech for its price

QUESTION guys does the haltech run the close loop function as the std ecu and pfc does as this is critical for fuel consumption if you use the car as a everyday driver.

As in this day and age with fuel for every getting more exspensive being apply to have a car of over 500rwhp and still do over 500kms per tank of fuel is hugh bonus. I pfc is my only choice for a atreet driven car.

pete

when the throttle is steady on cruise it looks at the 02 sensor valve and trims fuel to reach the ideal afr of 14.7. so if at cruise the afr is 13.2 cos the tune is rich when you are crusing the ecu will look at the 02 sensor. the 02 sensor will report "rich" so the ecu will begin slowly leaning itself out until the 02 sensor reports "lean" and then it will keep bouncing between the two,

14.7 is ideal afr for cruising. on stock ish powerfc maps and closed loop feedback off your economy will suck the wang. but its not the be all and end all of economy. i have 02 feedback off on my FC and im getting good economy, but i spent considerable time tuning cruise afr's with a wideband sensor on the street. its known as closed loop as it enters loop operation with closed feedback from the 02 sensor

how does this close loop function work?

ok you basically have two systems that run the fuel system mixtures

1/maps that are preset valves according to rpm and afm reading

pfc run a 20 by 20 map one axles rpm and the other afm (loading)

2/ close loop which is engauged when a fixed throddle position is maintained for small period of time (ie cruising or idle etc) this is basically a self tuning system using the o2 sensor to tune its self while the fixed throddle position is maintain. It is the best way to get good fuel comsumption out of a high performance turbo engine as it means you can keep the map safe and rich but the car will lean back to normal when cruising.

pete

ps i hope i explained it correctly not the best at doing so lol

From what I was told by many people closed loop was used by factories to keep the CAT alive, nothing else.

As Paul mentioned, economy can be maintained if not improved without closed loop by tuning leaner than 14.7 but it will take more time.

At $2750, my SMC was cheaper. But I have been told the Haltech is a very decent ecu. A lot of people think if it isnt Motec or Autronic then its a class behind, which arguably they might have been a few years back but the others are improving and upgrading at a fast rate so they have to get there if not above sooner or later.

I wouldnt tune a car in the top end with Closed loop anyway

The haltech is the way to go mate

i installed one in a customers car around 3 weeks ago

his getting 380 kms out of a tank and the car is making around 400 rwhp

The tuning points are more finer and it is a benefit later when changeing ignition systems ETC

Even with large injectors the haltech can tune very fine.This skyline i just installed the ecu in has 850 or so cc sard injectors

The haltech is plug n Play

gets rid of the AFM

its $2750 Supplied installed and dyno tuned.

From what I was told by many people closed loop was used by factories to keep the CAT alive, nothing else.

As Paul mentioned, economy can be maintained if not improved without closed loop by tuning leaner than 14.7 but it will take more time.

At $2750, my SMC was cheaper. But I have been told the Haltech is a very decent ecu. A lot of people think if it isnt Motec or Autronic then its a class behind, which arguably they might have been a few years back but the others are improving and upgrading at a fast rate so they have to get there if not above sooner or later.

WRONG

the map can get reasonable results but can not get the same results a close loop as it tunes REAL time and will tune to the fuel its currnetly running the lot, and the map is only as good as its last tune (which can be quiet different to current condition) ie did you know that fuel companies run different blends summer to winter for example. And might i ask why does the close loop keep the cat alive , because it stops it running rich all the time when it doesn't need to be (rich means bad fuel comsumption). And last of all offen the needs of a map in one place between cruise and active driving are different and only this function gives you that option.

I have no doubt the haltech will make great power and the car will drive fine BUT it will not compete when it comes to balanced performance and fuel comsumption

pete

ps Xspeed has also had great results with the pfc d-jetro with high hp gtr run great fuel comsumption

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...