Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Tried the search function?

There is more than enough information on this forum for you to make your own mind up.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...amp;hl=autronic

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...amp;hl=autronic

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...c=54702&hl=

And the above are just the Autronic ones.

PowerFC threads are a dime a dozen

I am sorry, as a long term user of both Autronic (BMW SuperTourers and Commondoor V8Supercars) and Power FC's (Hondas and Nissans) I hardly think my advice is one sided.

:D cheers :D

Edited by Sydneykid

i had the pwoer fc on my car, and although it was great for a plug in ecu and was working great, till it got to the point where basically my engine had nothing stock left in it, i switched to an AUTRONIC SM4 although alot pricier than the power fc, i cant say i would ever use another ecu, the autronic is absolutley awesome

ben...

I am sorry, as a long term user of both Autronic (BMW SuperTourers and Commondoor V8Supercars) and Power FC's (Hondas and Nissans) I hardly think my advice is one sided.

:D cheers :D

Sydneykid, I apologize if the comments I have made on the PFC vs Autronic matter may have seemed as if it was directed to you. It wasn't! Nor am I questioning your vast experience. I have made general statements about this issue because pretty much everyone on this forum believe the only option is a PFC. There are only a hand full of people using Autronic compared to the majority of PFC users on this forum so obviously the advice that is going to be given is going to be very biased.

Just to make it clear, my last post was not directed to you it was a general observation!

Everyone should know that an autronic is a better ECU.

All the power FC is a stock ECU which can be programed that allows a boost controller and allows you to use bigger injectors.

I use a Power FC myself (and have no issues with it and thing they are a great ECU) but if anyone wants to swap for a autronic - PM me =)

Its all about money these days and the Power FC wins when it comes to buying and installing the unit.

Sydneykid, I apologize if the comments I have made on the PFC vs Autronic matter may have seemed as if it was directed to you. It wasn't! Nor am I questioning your vast experience. I have made general statements about this issue because pretty much everyone on this forum believe the only option is a PFC. There are only a hand full of people using Autronic compared to the majority of PFC users on this forum so obviously the advice that is going to be given is going to be very biased.

Just to make it clear, my last post was not directed to you it was a general observation!

Sydneykid, I apologize if the comments I have made on the PFC vs Autronic matter may have seemed as if it was directed to you. It wasn't! Nor am I questioning your vast experience. I have made general statements about this issue because pretty much everyone on this forum believe the only option is a PFC. There are only a hand full of people using Autronic compared to the majority of PFC users on this forum so obviously the advice that is going to be given is going to be very biased.

Just to make it clear, my last post was not directed to you it was a general observation!

No problems

:( cheers :D

i prefer autronic. but.. need a trigger disc for the crank angle sensor.

power fc. your relying on airflow meters. which i hate. and most of the time there 10yrs old.

powerfc is a plug in.

autronic has better contol of injectors (resolution) and the software is heaps easy to use.

power fc is a good unit that is made in korea. (most "jap" ecus are and that includes oem ecu's.)

i just prefer autronic. at the end of the day it all down to the tune

i prefer autronic. but.. need a trigger disc for the crank angle sensor.

power fc. your relying on airflow meters. which i hate. and most of the time there 10yrs old.

powerfc is a plug in.

autronic has better contol of injectors (resolution) and the software is heaps easy to use.

power fc is a good unit that is made in korea. (most "jap" ecus are and that includes oem ecu's.)

i just prefer autronic. at the end of the day it all down to the tune

What ECU are made in korea? I thought only KEFICO (Korean EFI Company) was the only oem ecu made in Korea. Most japanese ecu's are made in Japan aren't they? ie I thought Nippon DENSO were contracted by APEXI to make hte PFC just like standard nissan ECU's.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...