Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

And don't forget guys, this car does a 10.04 sec 1/4 mile according to the owner. It was published in this month's Autosalon magazine, full write up on the car....

Was at Dutton Rally at Sandown and overheard the owner claiming it had done a 10.04 sec 1/4 mile in Japan.... :D

Is it just me or does anybody else find that hard to believe???

500ps + 1500kg = 10.04??? :D

Oh, and why didn't they say what mph it reached??

Still, I'd buy one..... :laugh:

And don't forget guys, this car does a 10.04 sec 1/4 mile according to the owner. It was published in this month's Autosalon magazine, full write up on the car....

Was at Dutton Rally at Sandown and overheard the owner claiming it had done a 10.04 sec 1/4 mile in Japan.... :nyaanyaa:

Is it just me or does anybody else find that hard to believe???

500ps + 1500kg = 10.04??? :dry:

Oh, and why didn't they say what mph it reached??

Still, I'd buy one..... :sleep:

Everyone talks it up... just some go further than others...

It has a lot more than 500ps :/

Really?? Has it been modified beyond Nismo Z-Tune specs?? Or is Nismo underrating the power??

Here's the specs according to Nismo: http://www.nismo.co.jp/Z-tune/data_e/6.html

They also claim it weighs 1600kg, I thought it would have been 1500kg with all the carbon fibre.

Then again all the diff/trans coolers would add weight...

So blacksx, how much power has it got?? I'm curious... :)

  • 2 weeks later...
And don't forget guys, this car does a 10.04 sec 1/4 mile according to the owner. It was published in this month's Autosalon magazine, full write up on the car....

Was at Dutton Rally at Sandown and overheard the owner claiming it had done a 10.04 sec 1/4 mile in Japan.... ;)

Is it just me or does anybody else find that hard to believe???

500ps + 1500kg = 10.04??? :)

Oh, and why didn't they say what mph it reached??

Still, I'd buy one..... :(

I don't find it hard to believe, the data was recorded on Nissan's own test course so I'd be happy to believe it were true.

If it came 4th, who came 3rd, 2nd, and 1st?

P.S. dream car there...

Team Outright

1. Mitsubishi Lancer EVO VI

2. Whiteline EVO VIII

3. Mitsubishi EVO 3

The Z Tune actually scored enough points to place 2nd outright however it was docked points by the officials for some "circular antics" in the pits/carpark

The proto version would run 10,s but the one;s they sold would no way go 10.02.

In plenty of best motoring vids the Proto version is way faster/quicker and looks like a 10 sec car but in videos with the street version the car no where near moves, revs or sounds quick enough for a 10, It was struggling to catch a new corvette down tsukuba and didnt catch it not to metion the S205 Sti that was in front of them both.

See for yourselfs.

GTR R34 Z -Tune Proto vid at Nurburgring--

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=735zkR7xTgw

GTR R34 Z-Tune 500ps production model-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-emo2QIMmeY

There is another video of the Proto at Nismo festival Fisco and it came 3rd the vid isnt on Youtube anymore.

1st was ATTKD BNR34 GAIAX

2nd Mines BNR34

3rd Z-tune Proto

4th MCR BCNR33

The proto had closer to 800ps no cat converter and more agressive tune that would go 10.02, the production one would of never kept up with the mines GTR

Edited by nismo 400 R N1
The proto version would run 10,s but the one;s they sold would no way go 10.02.

In plenty of best motoring vids the Proto version is way faster/quicker and looks like a 10 sec car but in videos with the street version the car no where near moves, revs or sounds quick enough for a 10, It was struggling to catch a new corvette down tsukuba and didnt catch it not to metion the S205 Sti that was in front of them both.

See for yourselfs.

GTR R34 Z -Tune Proto vid at Nurburgring--

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=735zkR7xTgw

GTR R34 Z-Tune 500ps production model-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-emo2QIMmeY

There is another video of the Proto at Nismo festival Fisco and it came 3rd the vid isnt on Youtube anymore.

1st was ATTKD BNR34 GAIAX

2nd Mines BNR34

3rd Z-tune Proto

4th MCR BCNR33

The proto had closer to 800ps no cat converter and more agressive tune that would go 10.02, the production one would of never kept up with the mines GTR

Thought so, the specs just don't add up...

The proto sounds like it had no restrictions like the production model has...

Thanks for the info!!!!

I can't say for sure if this Z-Tune could run a flat 10 or not.

However what I can say is that in the Dutton Rally Vic this year the Z-Tune on the Airport run ran a best time of 15.46s.

It should be noted that Mark Berry's best time for that event is 15.76s and Mark has run a 10.4s 1/4 mile. So the Z Tunes drag time was under Marks time and Marks 10.4s was done on R Comps.

Having competed against the car there is no question it's a decent bit of kit.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to !
    • As I've said elsewhere, I am using the stock intercooler piping path in the engine bay, and a return flow cooler, and making ~250 rwkW (without any effort put into trying to turn it up past there just yet) and expect to be able to make some more, and frankly, I would be perfectly happy with 260-270rwKW. This is peak road Skyline usability territory. You go past there and, sure, the car will snap necks more when it's on boost, but it will also break shit all the time, cost a (even larger) fortune in tyres, etc etc. Anyway, I also do not like the over-the-fan pipe path, and you don't have to do it.
    • I see, honestly I’m not too fussed about the looks. The only reason to go plenum is to make the piping easier instead of the classic over the rad etc. 
    • Not easy to quantify wrt something like how many fractions of a second slower it would be over 0-100. But given that a 250-300rwkW car is able to do that launch sprint in 5-6 sec (and faster with appropriate tyres, and surface)..... giving up as much as a second would feel like torture. A ~450HP capable turbo is not going to make lots of boost in the 2000-3000 rpm range. So, whilst with some boost on hand it will be faster accelerating in that rev range than your engine currently is NA, it will not feel like a fast car until the boost is solidly in. You know what your car feels like right now when you open it up at 2000rpm. if you've ever been in an actual fast car, you will appreciate that the NARB25 is.... not exciting. Well, add some boost and it will be better. But shorten the intake runners and it might not be better at all. It might come out better, but it could end up feeling the same. For me, it's not the 0-X km/h sprints that matter. It is easy to fry the tyres with anything over 200 rwkW. You can't use all the power available in 1st and 2nd anyway, you have to modulate the throttle. What matters is how the car reacts when you're driving in traffic in 4th or 5th and have maybe 2000 rpm on board, and you want/need to add some speed quickly, and don't have time for the downshift. It won't make boost, it will be all NA (at the speeds we're talking about - remember how fast you're going at 2000 in 4th! and don't plan on breaking the limit by too much.) So giving away NA torque is not what I would consider practical for a street car. And retaining that NA torque builds boost faster which makes the car faster. The flashy plenum is not actually better, unless you're looking at a track car where you can keep it on the boil all the time.  
    • So how much difference does it make you think? Like 1 second in the 0-100?  I was have smaller turbo so hopefully that spools quick GTX2871.  currently it’s NA so you can imagine pretty slow, but I do want fast accusation a little as there’s not many places I’ll be driving where I go over 80 even near me. So 0-60 and 0-80 targets   
×
×
  • Create New...