Jump to content
SAU Community

An Idea I Came Up With

rice_me_up

By rice_me_up,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

fr0st Experienced

fr0st

Posted
Posted

Theres more than one form of antilag...

The one most used it the rich and retard at idle and when shifting gears. You retard the timing so much that the combustion continues out the exhaust valve and down the manifold making hotter exhaust temps. It probably wouldn't reduce the life of your turbo unless you exceeding what the exhaust temp would be at full load but your engine would get worked from the increased heat.

Another one I've heard of is instead of plumbing back the BOV to the intake its piped into the exhaust manifold.

Theres also another one (I think they mentioned it on top gear) where they dump excess fuel into the exhaust manifold. It hits the sides of the chamber and ignite and generates more heat that way.

I don't think you'd be able to drive the turbo shaft via anything without causing it to vibrate itself apart. The only was I could see it happening is it you have magnets on the compressor wheel and drive it like a brushless DC motor (nothing makes contact with the shaft or compressor).

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Posted Images

700HP-GTR33 Mentor

700HP-GTR33

Posted
Posted
las i checked they had one of these already, and it was called an eaton.

I am scared to even ask what it was.Some sort of compressor tank i would have thought.

Definition=

EATON - lets take your clothes off so i can eaton you babe... :laugh:

paulr33 Grand Master

paulr33

Posted
Posted
Theres more than one form of antilag...

The one most used it the rich and retard at idle and when shifting gears. You retard the timing so much that the combustion continues out the exhaust valve and down the manifold making hotter exhaust temps. It probably wouldn't reduce the life of your turbo unless you exceeding what the exhaust temp would be at full load but your engine would get worked from the increased heat.

you can do this with most stand alone ecu's you retard the timing and dump fuel on the area of that map that it runs over when you perform a gear change. for powerfc users this is the very top row in the IGN and INJ map. its load 0 to 1445 on the gtst FC. if you change all that row to 0deg ign it will pop and backfire on gearchange (mine does) and if u want as rich as possible, then edit the same row on the INJ map.

its probably likely to increase the change of ceramic exhaust wheel failure however

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • funkymonkey
      Jacks that fit under GTR lips that can reach the subframe?

      By funkymonkey · Posted

      I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • Duncan
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Duncan · Posted

      You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...