Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

can anyone confirm this? apparently it says so on nengun and that the price for them is $800 http://www.nengun.com/catalogue/product/20

how much would you pay for a nismo 10point key now?

Silly...silly...silly.

They were listed alot higher before. I think $3900 or so.

If they can't get any-more how are they going to sell them? :P

They can't be worth that much, but having stated that if you are willing to pay $700 you can buy mine.

Cheers

Tekin

bahaha... thing better be made of 24carat gold for that price. just buy a knockoff chinese one for 10 bucks. its a key ffs. they even do code cutting for you for a few extra quid.

Yes Nismo ceased production of the Nismo key blank.

Clearly Nenguns price is to deter people from ordering a part that isnt available, though you would think it would be easier to remove the item all together

bahaha... thing better be made of 24carat gold for that price. just buy a knockoff chinese one for 10 bucks. its a key ffs. they even do code cutting for you for a few extra quid.

where can you get the knock offs?

Best to ring up Nissan and ask them if it's been discontinued. I doubt that it has, as the R34 and S15 share the same key... and our local nissan dealer had just brought one in for a customer.

where can you get the knock offs?

in melbourne's chinatown there was a shop that sold the nismo and GTR ones... for like 15 bucks or 30 bucks with the code cut.

I'm in melbourne this weekend.

Could you be a little more specific? was it a car shop funky?

dude, if you find them, and they are $15, you gotta grab me one.

I'll fix up the postage etc. need one for R33 S1.

lol its on lonsdale st near chinatown... dunno the exact address... it was one of them asian variety sorta shops where they sold everything from hello kitty bags to pirate dvds.

Hey i can sell it for 350 :O

Maybe some-one should get SAU Nismo China knock off's made.

We could make a killing.

And as far as removing the photo and price.......cost less to increase the price.

Maybe they are holding some in stock for the stupid. :spank:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...