Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ER3407890

Here you go (with options page).

post-24887-1191884834_thumb.jpg

Model: R34

Series: 25GTT

Built: June 1998

Colour: Sonic Silver

Body: 2 door coupe

Transmission: 5 speed manual

Options:

15 = Rear wiper + UV cut privacy glass + Xenon Headlamps

16 = Glovebox light + remote entry + trunk lid

If anyone wants to check the translations for the options, please do so.

BNR32 314356

KBNR32RXFS7AA

Date: 9411

Ext: AH3

Int: G

2K

RB26DETT

HICAS 4WD

GTR

MT.F5

I *think* that means non v-spec

I cant get that options thing up like SMR33 either (different version maybe? fast 3.5, 2001/10 cd;s)

Edited by TonyL
PS13-006847

PS13HACM29

Here you go. Can't tell about the Nismo bar.

post-24887-1193094726_thumb.jpg

BNR34-404031

This number does not appear in my version of FAST, sorry.

BNR32314356

I do not think this is a v-spec. The codes point to being a GTR only. Besides the build date is in 1994, v-spec II was being made then, not v-spec.

post-24887-1193094754_thumb.jpg

The model number is KBNR32RXFS7AA, which I'll describe below (as best I can):

K = hard top (ie coupe)

B = RB26DETT

N = 4WD

R32 = R32

R = 2 door

X = GTR

F = 5 speed

S = intercooler turbo

7 = 16 inch tyre (if it were a v-spec II it would have '8' here, which would indicate the 17 inch BBS wheels which came on a v-spec II)

AA = other options which I'm not sure of as these are listed in kanji.

Hope this helps you out anyway.

I cant get that options thing up like SMR33 either (different version maybe? fast 3.5, 2001/10 cd;s)

The options screen I posted previously is for a 34 (similar screen for 33). The screens containing options for a 32 are much more long winded (ie 27 pages worth) and its pretty much all in japanese (including a lot in kanji).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
×
×
  • Create New...