Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i was chatting to Mercury Motorsport yesterday about a new product they are selling. They will replace the read-only ROM in your ECU with a programable EEPROM and tune it in realtime on the dyno with some software called "nissan edit" (apparently developed by "dr drift" tuning in Victoria).

Has anyone had any experience with this method of ECU tuning?

Sounds like a neat way to get new ECU maps...no replacement of the ECU unit required.

They quoted me $750 for the mod and 2hrs dyno time on my R34 gtt. Normally $960, but its on special being a new product (prolly need some guineapigs to get used to the new tuning software) :)

Sounds like a bargain, but i'm trying to work out if there are any downsides compared to other ECU chips/piggybacks/replacements.

linkage:

http://www.mercurymotorsport.com.au/produc...nedit/index.htm

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/138032-remap-stock-ecu-with-nissan-edit/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

They haven't been getting the results they should have and I think this is all about practice. It can work well but the first people getting it - and there are a few already are not getting the value.

Are you auto or manual?

i'll be in at Mercury Motorsport getting my ECU tuned tomorrow and will post results when i have them

Abo bob - are you talking about the same place? they are in brisbane and you're in sydney...

anyway, they have the software that Sam (aka Dr Drift) uses and he'll be there tomorrow and the next day training the guys in using the software etc.

They know how to tune cars already - they are well versed in the power FC, ecutek, and other aftermarket ECUs. they just have to learn the software

anyway i'll let you know how i go

cheers,

Warren

My understanding of it after reading the HPI it was featured in is: They create a state of tune right for your car with its current setup then burn the data to the eprom chip and install it into your standard ecu. Therefore its not adjustable. Once its done it is set until you get a new chip remapped for a different setup.

the advantage is that you ratins knock adjustment, cold start, etc.

if you go back to the same place then they can keep your tune on their computer, and when adding a mod to the car they simply change a few parameters and burn a new chip..

the only difference to the powerFC is that you have to re-install a new chip each time. other then that there's no difference. car is still tuned on teh dyno with a computer its not a plug ang play option like some of the "chips" out there...

oh, and there's no initial outlay like the $1000+ you pay for powerFC and hand controller :wave:

there is someone in brissy doing r33's. my mate fried his 33 ecu (talking hole in the chip) and sent it to them and they sorted it out. they had tuned the ecu in the first place, and did another chip for him. rev limit at 7600, no speed cut, no r&r, etc.

Once its done it is set until you get a new chip remapped for a different setup.

Well thats kinda true and kinda not true

With both the standard ECU and the PFC, you tune them for your current mods, the day, they dyno etc etc, then set the timing and fuel based on that.

From there, when you change anything like a little more boost or a zorst, you will no longer have the best tune for your mods....but in many cases you just move around the map a little but still get good results.

But if you want to get back to a "best" tune you will need to retune it......whether PFC or standard.

With the later computers you can put a new EPROM daughterboard that lets you tune, but the 32 computers can be tuned straight up

I'm talking about Sam. I like the idea of knock protection however I blew my engine with one of these in it so it obviously doesn't work.

If you have a manual then I still think the PFC is the way to go. If auto then a little persistance will pay off - for the people after you.

Waz, you have an R32. Completely different and well known by tuners, including Sam. This is fairly new to R34's and different rules apply.

Installing the chip, is just a matter of soldering a socket in place of the stock rom, this is a 30 minute job + $10 parts for the socket and blank eeprom. $750 is quite high as a up-front cost.

I didn't know you could do R34's, i though you needed a daughterboard... anyway. If this is included it would add more to the cost.

Make sure the tuner is using the latest version of the emulator and software, because only the later eprom emulator hardware will be able to do a "map trace". With the older software (freely availble, it's called Live Edit) you can't do map traces, the newer version NRE is much better but the old-school emulator hardware won't work for Map Traces. For more info, you can download it here http://www.romeditor.com/

dont waste you money just buy a power fc trust me , and if car is auto convert to manual

i'm after an informed decision, not an emotional one....can you actually ellaborate on why a PFC would be the better option?

well if it is an auto r32, i would be looking at every option before converting to manual and putting a pfc in. there is a huge difference in price. especially if it is a r32. the cost difference between a r32 remap, and getting a pfc and manual conversion is a well over $1000.

i run a remapped ecu in my 33. haven't had any issues with the ecu.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...