Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have a 1999 R34 GT (manual) RB25DE

Put out 101.8 kW fully stock then put on a full Trust stainless steel catback exhaust with 80mm tubing and 115mm tip, and a full cold air intake kit (with a Trust Airinx pod filter), did another power run and the car jumped up to 118.7 kW. I thought that wasnt too bad really!!!!

Edited by MissR34
  • 3 weeks later...

1997 R33 GTS25 series 2

I just got the 33 dynoed on the weekend. Came out with 160hp/116KW at the rear wheels. Engine is completly stock, Only with cat back exhaust.

Also: My mechanic pointed out to me that it has a set of nismo racing struts on it as well, They were already on the car = win!

Edited by OBNXSH
  • 2 weeks later...

new power figure

dyno dynamics

modifications: standard panel filter, coby extractors, 2.5" cat and 2.5" cat back exhaust, matty spry tuned safc2

power: 115.4rwkw

consensus: panel filter and an intake idea and i'd be done. wouldn't recommend going any further with power mods, despite the coolness of cams, cam gears, port and polish - costs would be astronomical for minimal gains, you would also be looking into a proper ecu to make the full use of them. extractors dont give any sort of peak power, but driveability and fatter mid range is very noticeable. with the retune reving is much smoother, power delivery is nice and "free", definitely a much better car to drive. peak power is only a number.

future mods: would stick to drivetrain mods; lightened flywheel, shorter diff ratio, lighter tail shaft - try to make the current power more useable.

does it have to be skyline...... 98 3.5 v6 Mitsubishi verada (4 speed slush box auto) with pacemaker extractors, lukey muffler mandrel bent 2.5 inch system + unichip = 130fwkw

  • Like 1

my r34 gt is now doing 119.9kW at rear wheels. just got extractors put on so going back in a couple of weeks (to allow ecu/sensors to adjust and do its funky thing). my car can now breathe!!!!!

Model: 1987 R31 Skyline Ti

Engine: RB30DE with VVT

Modifications: Extractors, exhaust, twin tb, safc untuned, billet f/wheel, reground surecams, 10.5 compression, 18 degrees timing, 98ron ultimate

Power: 150.9RWKW @ 172kmph an 507nm (374FtLb) torque at 144kmph

with more left in it, she's an economical daily but rich and restricted above 5000rpm so once thats tuned/fixed i'll be a happy camper

I built this engine and ran it in my 86 r31 Skyline station wagon . With a 4.11 locked diff , 195,60x14 radials @ 20psi , i recorded a best 1/4 mile of 14.15 @ 97.6 mph at Willowbank dragstrip 16-8-2006 .

Also at Lake Gairdner speed trials 2006 ,max speed of 141.18 mph ( 227kmh ) using 3.7 diif with .75 OD . ( had fuel starvation prob )

Well after yesterday.....

Model: 2000 R34 GTV Manual

Engine: RB25DE NEO

Good Mods: Fujitsubo Cat Back ( 70mm pipe ) - APEXi Panel Filter

Bad Mods: Starcorp Impul 18's w/275/35/18 ( fcuking heavy )

Power: 107.7rwkw

  • 5 weeks later...
Model: Z33 manual

Engine: VQ35DE

Mods: 2.5" catback exhaust (not entirely dual), intake manifold spacer, pod filter, Unichip

Power: 189.2rwkW

Mods: Above + extractors, high flow cats, modified intake plenum runners, increased redline, retuned Unichip

Power: 195rwkW

R31 Silhouette

RB30E Manual

S1 Cam, Powerchip, Extractors, 2.25" Exhaust with one muffler, no silencer, Hi Flow Cat

Heavy Duty Clutch, R33 Airbox with sealed cold air intake, LSD.

117rwkw 14.2 0-400m

Citroen Xsara VTS 2004 2.0lt XU10J4RS

Hi Flow sealed air intake, Tuned Mandrel Exhaust 2.25", Chip

114fwkw 15.0 0-400m

  • 1 month later...

Car: Aussie R31 GX

Engine: RB30e internally standard ie. standard head & cam

Trans: factory 5 speed

Mods: XF Falcon TB, 3" mandrel bent intake pipe with K&N pod, raising rate fuel pressure reg, extractors, 2.5" straight through exhaust with very high flow cat, advanced timing, 10mm leads, Exedy clutch & minispool.

Power: 108rwkw on a Dyno Dynamics dyno

Carl

  • 3 months later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...

pulled 115.6rwkw with a fuel problem.

need a new pump and change of fuel filter.

should be able to hit 120 with a bit of timing advance as well.

dynodynamics dyno @ unigroup engineering.

5zigen 2.5" catback exhaust & K&N Ms pod filter.

Edited by whyte

interesting figures,,,

for the record mine was totaly stock at 200.9hp (149kw)at flywheel and 140hp 104kw.@wheels(6500revs)

with 150lbft torque @ 5400 revs

from the comparisons on here and given that was stock with new plugs, thats quite high suprisingly.

Edited by Hesh
  • 2 weeks later...

I know its not a nissan and not a skyline.... (i'm on here looking for power figures of NA 6's... actually in the market for a 350Z to modify NA style...)

My N/A BA XR6 Falcon puts out 194.3rwkw... @ 6800rpm

(192rwkw @ 5800rpm)

Currently has -

Nizpro CAMS

CAPA flash tune (by Nizpro)

Custom Twin Throttle Body setup (2x 70mm TB's)

Nizpro Custom Extractors

BF Turbo Exhaust

to Come -

Compression increase from 9.65 > 10.4

Intake manifold Phenolic Spacer

Individual Throttle Bodies (6x 45mm)

Port and polish

Custom Zorst with twin 2.25" metal cats

Retune...

for those who don't care about the falcons but are curious, the Barra 182 Engine stock is a 4.0L inline 6 with 182 Fly wheel kilowatts.

How much should I expect from similar mods on a VQ35DE?

Cheers

Edited by Guardian_aiur

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...