Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

nah, 1 bar is bordering on the turbo's max efficiency, some people report a performance drop even, from 12 psi. Anyway, 14 psi (1 bar) is too high for the standard turbo and it wont last long, try out 12 psi (.83 bar i think) it'll still feel quite a bit faster than stock

yea, I was thinking of just keeping it around stock for everyday driving, then just changing it before I really wanna push it. pushing a bar for a few hours everyweek shouldn't be that bad?

p.s.

is there a noticeable gas mileage difference also? forgot to ask that one before

it is noticeable different.

But your playing with fire IMO.

Stick to 12psi. With a good tune, and a set of cam gears... you wont know the car it'll be much nicer to drive

What is with you and cam gears. They do squat! Changing to slotted cam gears isnt of much benefit unless you can verify either retarding or advancing the cam is adventageous.

And your avatar. It merits ridicule.

Has anyone got a compressor map for the stock turbo?

Does anyone actually have any idea or are we all just talking shit about what the guy next to us has said?

The GTR runs half total boost on each turbo. So by my calculations, that would mean the stock turbos WILL blow up if they run more than 7.5psi each. Holy shit, and here I was thinking that 10-12psi each was more of a realistic maximum for each one.

What is with you and cam gears. They do squat! Changing to slotted cam gears isnt of much benefit unless you can verify either retarding or advancing the cam is adventageous.

And your avatar. It merits ridicule.

I second that notion. He advised a customer of mine to not worry about cams and just put the gears on. Makes the same power it did before. Drives exactly the same after the tune. Definately looks prettier though.

Has anyone got a compressor map for the stock turbo?

Does anyone actually have any idea or are we all just talking shit about what the guy next to us has said?

The GTR runs half total boost on each turbo. So by my calculations, that would mean the stock turbos WILL blow up if they run more than 7.5psi each. Holy shit, and here I was thinking that 10-12psi each was more of a realistic maximum for each one.

I'm glad I cleared that one up then.

Um, if you run a single turbo system at 14PSi, the turbo sees 14PSi.

If you run a twin turbo system at 14PSi, each turbo STILL sees 14PSi... You don't halve it.

What gets halved, is the CFM through each turbo. Two TOTALLY different things.

The are a great RB26 mod, thats whats with it

One of the best value for money mods, cheap as chips and can return upto 25rwkw in the midrange.

So i'd say thats pretty adventageous, wouldnt you?

If you dont get a gain, so be it, lots of people have. For $150... well... hard not to try it.

Um, if you run a single turbo system at 14PSi, the turbo sees 14PSi.

If you run a twin turbo system at 14PSi, each turbo STILL sees 14PSi... You don't halve it.

What gets halved, is the CFM through each turbo. Two TOTALLY different things.

The stock actuators open at 4psi. Yes....halve it.

And at any rate, 14psi is not going to kill a pair of GTR turbos. Sure it may have screwed a few in history but that doesn't mean it was caused by running that much boost.

The are a great RB26 mod, thats whats with it

One of the best value for money mods, cheap as chips and can return upto 25rwkw in the midrange.

So i'd say thats pretty adventageous, wouldnt you?

If you dont get a gain, so be it, lots of people have. For $150... well... hard not to try it.

I cant see how just 'replacing' the cam gears is going to net you gains. 25 kw gains at that.

Please elaborate more. Are you talking about a direct swap, or adjustable 'slotted' cam gears you can adjust valve events start / end timing with?

The stock actuators open at 4psi. Yes....halve it.

And at any rate, 14psi is not going to kill a pair of GTR turbos. Sure it may have screwed a few in history but that doesn't mean it was caused by running that much boost.

Nah mate, the other dude is right, however its actually about mass flowrate not volumetric flowrate (CFM) as that implies that temperature effects are negligble. i.e. you could one volumetric flowrate but different mass flowrates for varying temperatures.

So two turbos running at 9 psi nets 9 psi MAP but twice the massflowrate than one would at the same boost pressure.

But i agree with you nismoid should really stop giving out crap advice, but hes victorian, the home of material boys. Im guessing he gets a commission for selling as many cam gears as possible. That or dreams of them

The only evidence, I've been told of, for not wanting to run over 12PSi on a 'Line turbo, is the ceramic wheel.

Do the GTR still run ceramic wheels on there turbos?

The best way to decide on your boost level, is on the dyno, you can see what increase you get, and usually people dial in the most boost they can, before power doesn't seem to increase... Unless of course the turbo is likely to fail (From delamination etc)

i have to say I dont buy the 14psi=blown turbo myth. Providing you keep exhaust temp under control, the car is tuned well and things are generally in good condition 14psi should be fine for a squirt every now and then.

as for the cam gears. andrewd, he's talking about adjustable cam gears. i can't say i've ever seen replacement cam gears tha weren't adjustable so I guess he assumed you could figure that out. obviously just fitting them doesn't do shit, they need to be tuned. on my GTR power went from 220kw atw to 247kw atw purely though cam gear adjustment. midrange was up around 30kw from about 3500rpm upwards.

andrewd, a little bit of personal advicee. you may not like 31nismoid, but have your wits about you and recognise that he is a long standing, respected member and moderator of this forum. you on the other hand have been a member here for just under 1 month and so far have not contributed much at all so lay off the personal attacks (to nismoid or anyone else for that matter) as things will progress very simply from there. warning, warning, ban.

Yes - adjustable cam gears... I thought anyone would realise the stock ones arent adjustable so you need to either

1) mod the stockers (cheap)

2) purchase adj ones (little more costly)

Ah yeah, what Beer Baron said for the rest of it.

The 26 benefits a lot from some cam gears, as i have experienced last week. i dont know why people talk shit when they dont know a thing about what they are talkin about. And nismoid ur advice can hit hard and sarcastic at some times, but till now i have read good advice from your posts, especially when i was about to build my engine.

Edited by Faid

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Please ignore I found the right way of installing it thanks
    • There are advantages, and disadvantages to remapping the factory.   The factory runs billions of different maps, to account for sooooo many variables, especially when you bring in things like constantly variable cams etc. By remapping all those maps appropriately, you can get the car to drive so damn nicely, and very much so like it does from the factory. This means it can utilise a LOT of weird things in the maps, to alter how it drives in situations like cruise on a freeway, and how that will get your fuel economy right down.   I haven't seen an aftermarket ECU that truly has THAT MANY adjustable parameters. EG, the VAG ECUs are somewhere around 2,000 different tables for it to work out what to do at any one point in time. So for a vehicle being daily driven etc, I see this as a great advantage, but it does mean spending a bit more time, and with a tuner who really knows that ECU.   On the flip side, an aftermarket ECU, in something like a weekender, or a proper race car, torque based tuning IMO doesn't make that much sense. In those scenarios you're not out there hunting down stuff like "the best way to minimise fuel usage at minor power so that we can go from 8L/100km to 7.3L/100km. You're more worried about it being ready to make as much freaking power as possible when you step back on the loud pedal as you come out of turn 2, not waiting the extra 100ms for all the cams to adjust etc. So in this scenario, realistically you tune the motor to make power, based on the load. People will then play with things like throttle response, and drive by wire mapping to get it more "driveable".   Funnily enough, I was watching something Finnegans Garage, and he has a huge blown Hemi in a 9 second 1955 Chev that is road registered. To make it more driveable on the road recently, they started testing blocking up the intake with kids footballs, to effectively reduce air flow when they're on the road, and make the throttle less touchy and more driveable. Plus some other weird shit the yankee aftermarket ECUs do. Made me think of Kinks R34...
    • I do this, I also don't get the joke  
    • Return flow cooler will be killing you I reckon. You can certainly push more through a low mount setup but they're good numbers for a stock looking engine bay.  Mine made 345rwkw (hub) at 22psi on 98 with a "highflow" on a stock manifold but it's a long way from a normal high flow or standard engine. I used one of those Turbosmart IWG-75's and it was great with the Motec running closed loop boost with pressure being applied to both sides of the diaphragm. 
    • Hey man do you have pic of adaptor plate by any chance I need to match up the bolt holes as my gearbox adaptor plate ones are way off the only bolts of starter motor are matching thanks 
×
×
  • Create New...