Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

1st i've done a search and couldnt find much help :(

ok

-I'm looking at putting R34 GTR Brembos or R33 GTR Brembo (betweens which one i can find) onto my R33 GTS-T, i will be doing both the front and the rear

1- is it a direct bolt on? if i use gtr disc?

2- would it be worth while to use braided brake lines and if so would i use ones to suit gtr or gtst?

3- what issue will have have with the brake caliper and my rims? currently im running 17inch, 9inch wide with around +35 offset, is there a way to see if they will fit or not?

4- i read it is worth while to also upgrade the brake master cylinder, does anyone know where i can source one? (ive yet to be able to find one)

Also any other helpful hints/tips etc would be much apperciated (sp)

thanks Michael :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/139168-gtr-brembos-on-gtst-r33/
Share on other sites

R33 will bolt on but R34 use bigger mounting bolts so some modifying will be needed

SS braided lines will always be an improvement & I think gtr/gtst are the same

Brembo calipers and 324mm rotors should fit under 17" rims but if you state what brand/style rims you have somebody might confirm this for you

I wouldn't bother with the master cylinder unless you get it for the right price. I think the difference would be minimal

Also, buy the best brake fluid you can get and fit a master cylinder brake brace (if you don't already have one)

I'm pretty sure the 33/34 GTR brakes will not bolt onto a 33 gtst, the mounting points for the caliper are different. You will need a bracket adaptor, you can get one made up if you are keen and good with CAD. Or you can look around and buy a set, I have a feeling UAS sell a kit - but I'm not sure if it is for 33/34 GTR to 33 GTST.

Yes it would be worthwile buying braided brake lines and you would use the ones from a GTST, it is their length and bracket positions that may be different. The fittings are the same (I think) but you will have to check - can someone confirm?

17 x 9 inch with +35 *should* fit, that is only my estimation.

Yes it would be worthwile upgrading the master cylinder, pigger pistons will require more fluid flow which will require a bigger master cylinder. You may find you need to upgrade the master cylinder to be legal.

BTW: This is a very expensive upgrade, what are you doing with the car? some very serious competition racing I hope? The GTST brakes are pretty good, just get good disks, pads, fluid, remove backing plates and a bit of ducting if heat is a problem. They are more than adequate for the street and fine for track days (street trim, 200rwkW, QLD raceway style straights)

I'm pretty sure the 33/34 GTR brakes will not bolt onto a 33 gtst, the mounting points for the caliper are different. You will need a bracket adaptor, you can get one made up if you are keen and good with CAD. Or you can look around and buy a set, I have a feeling UAS sell a kit - but I'm not sure if it is for 33/34 GTR to 33 GTST.

Yes it would be worthwile buying braided brake lines and you would use the ones from a GTST, it is their length and bracket positions that may be different. The fittings are the same (I think) but you will have to check - can someone confirm?

17 x 9 inch with +35 *should* fit, that is only my estimation.

Yes it would be worthwile upgrading the master cylinder, pigger pistons will require more fluid flow which will require a bigger master cylinder. You may find you need to upgrade the master cylinder to be legal.

BTW: This is a very expensive upgrade, what are you doing with the car? some very serious competition racing I hope? The GTST brakes are pretty good, just get good disks, pads, fluid, remove backing plates and a bit of ducting if heat is a problem. They are more than adequate for the street and fine for track days (street trim, 200rwkW, QLD raceway style straights)

Check that info. I think some of it is wrong.

R33 GTR calipers will bolt straight up if you use GTR rotors. R34 will need your hubs drilled out, not a big job, but why pay more for the R34 calipers only to have to mod your hubs. If you are going to do it then may as well throw braided lines and good pads in, otherwise the weakest link could mean a good setup is ordinary

Look up the piston sizes of the calipers..i think you will be surprised...GTSt calipers actually have more piston surface area...so dont worry about the master cylinder. See how it goes, if you find your current master cylinder is dead, or dies in the future then consider you may have to change it. Though personally i dont think you will need to

Look up the piston sizes of the calipers..i think you will be surprised...GTSt calipers actually have more piston surface area.

Err, wanna check that mate? Ill send you my favourite brake document.

Check that info. I think some of it is wrong.

R33 GTR calipers will bolt straight up if you use GTR rotors.

But the rotor is larger diameter (324mm vs 296mm) so you need a bracket to allow the caliper to clear the rotor right?

405.2mm^2 actually so this leaves

brake to master ratio 13.76 on a GTR

R32 master/GTR calliper ratio 15.43

R33 master/GTR calliper ratio 17.58

This is the ratio of master piston movement to overall brake pad movement

Im not saying you are wrong Geoff, but are you sure of those numbers. Im at work so cant check...arent the R32 pistons 40.4, and the Brembos something like 44 or 41mm and 38mm?????

And my understanding is that the equation only uses one side of the caliper, this way it allows for sliding calipers. What numbers are you using to get the area difference ?

Amazing as it is, I'm calculating from raw numbers rather than any specific calculator so zero consideration of the sliding calipers. All will be revealed when you check your home email but that is exactly the numbers I used. You must consider for all pistons when looking at caliper takeup and the application timing and this is part of the reason i believe the Brembo front/Sumitomo rear setup is so poor. The rears come on far too early and pinch causing discofort for the driver.

I've been spending some time on it, because of the "guesstimates" that exist and I simply despise the Brembo front/Sumitomo rear setup as imbalanced and "rice", although Michael is fitting front and rear which is better.

Michael the R34's I understand use a larger bolt, much like the 350Z

does the larger bolt make a much difference?

i was heading more towards the r33 gtr brembo as i have found them afair bit cheaper than the r34 gtr (i think people must like the yellow more than the black hehehe)

edit: is the physical size of the capliers the same ? (r33/r34)

cm (lead) cm (centre) cm (trail) " area (per side) sq. cm " " area total caliper sq. cm "

GTR32 (Sumitomo)

Front Caliper Piston (diam x qty) - 40.4 × 4 4.04 0.00 4.04 25.64 51.28

Rear Caliper Piston(diam x qty) - 38.18 × 2 3.82 0.00 0.00 11.45 22.90

GTR33/34 (Brembo)

Front Caliper Piston(diam x qty) - (44+38) × 2 3.80 0.00 4.40 26.55 53.09

Rear Caliper Piston(diam x qty) - 40 × 2 4.00 0.00 0.00 12.57 25.13

AP CP5555 6 Piston

27mm x 2 / 31.8mm x 2 / 38.1mm x 2 2.70 3.18 3.81 25.07 50.14

PBR 6-piston (front)

33mm x 6 3.30 3.30 3.30 25.66 51.32

PBR 4-piston (rear)

30mm x 4 3.00 0.00 3.00 14.14 28.27

Amazing as it is, I'm calculating from raw numbers rather than any specific calculator so zero consideration of the sliding calipers.

I will have a look tonight. But technically speaking sliding calipers suck for pad wear etc, but provided the piston sizes are the same for say the PBR style caliper that some HSVs / Corvettes get, well it can have the same braking force as say a 4 pot caliper as the brake equations only use the pistons frm one side of the caliper.

So, some quick Excel says R32 GTSt has 2564mm^2 and the GTR Brembo has 2655mm^2. Use those numbers and see if you feel the numbers will suggest results as dramatic as you think ?!?!?!?! :P

Oh fark it!!! At the end of the day, the R33 GTR gear will bolt on. Outside of that we are all talkign out of our asses, usually based on what old posts say, or what some misinformed (sometimes well informed) person has said. Will it work better then your old setup? Throw it on and see what YOU think. If you dont like it then odds are you will get your money back so wont be too expensive a lesson :spank:

Hi Roy , it sounds like the point you making is that a single piston floating caliper has the same clamping force (in theory) as a two piston opposing caliper with the same bore diametre ie old 240K . I was always lead to believe that the hydraulic force applied to two pistons in effectively the same cylinder is the same as for one in a single acting cylinder . You basically have the same master piston pressurising both sides of the opposing pistons so force or pressure is the same both sides . The way to increase the hydraulic advantage is to increase the cylinder diametre (caliper) . I guess you could use the example of an old wheel cylinder from twin leading shoe drum brakes . One cylinder two pistons with a central fluid supply , the force wouldnt double in a single piston cylinder all else being equal .

Obviously floating calipers don't have the rigidity of an opposing piston caliper be they two four or six pistons .

So the way I see it we need to look at the master cylinder piston area (bore size) in relation to the brake caliper piston area , but treating each effective single piston or opposing pistons as its bore size by one . So I guess you could say that if a four piston opposing caliper had the same size pistons as your Corvette floating two piston caliper the hydraulic force will be the same . How well the structure of the caliper stands up to the forces applied depends on the rigidity of the caliper particularly the floating "bridge" type , these tend to want to spread or flex the bridge just like a G clamp does with too much force applied . Actually the floating caliper is virtually a hydraulic G clamp and flexes like one . Opposing piston calipers are often two piece affairs with through bolts and a large clamping area to keep the pistons on the same axis 90 deg to the disc .

As for cost vs brake performance , larger diametre discs and caliper extentions get you higher surface speed with the disc betwen the pads and more disc material to absorb/dissipate the heat . Also more mechanical advantage or lever ratio from the larger radius . Quick , simple , straightforward . Going the Brembo route (provided they're a bolt on conversion) is expensive but a factory option so no dramas as long as the complete set of components is used . I'm a bit surprised the rear discs didn't grow more in proportion to the front ones on Brembo GTR's but cost and overall vehicle mass probably had a big say in this .

With some of my cars in the past I've tried to keep the rear disc diametre same or slightly larger than the front and used some form of manually adjustable pressure limit or "bias" control valve . I wouldn't deliberatly upgrade front brakes only and rely on higher rear line pressure (brake bias) to compensate because this could work the rear brakes harder than the factory intended and lead to fade when you least expect it .

My 2c spent again . Opinions ? Cheers A .

Yep...i think i agree with you :)

Perhaps the reason why the GTR doesnt run a rear rotor as big as you would expect is because the GTR has drive shafts, hubs, twin turbos, bigger intercooler, transfer case etc etc all up the front so its nose heavier then a GTSt. Hence it probably isnt able to run as much rear bias??!?!?!?!?!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • A few small updates since the previous post and lessons. I decided to do a little interior light upgrade on the 110. I quite like the iilumo items, even if they're a bit of a premium over other brands. You'll also note the Stedi Fogs, that will go into the S15 fog lights as I needed to match the bulbs since I got the new ones earlier. I hope they fit as the body is quite a bit longer than your normal bulb.  Annoyingly, I managed to trip the fuse, which normally wouldn't be an issue until I located the fuse. I can't say I've ever come across this. I had lucked out that someone nearby had a spare, but oddly enough Toyota dealerships seem to keep this in stock. I ordered some to keep in my stash and as luck would have it, someone else nearby tripped the same fuse so I passed on the favour.  I also did a little service on the 110 ahead of some additional work coming up. It's been annoying that Goleby's stopped carrying this particular HKS filter for the 110, so now I need to keep them on order from Japan. I also took the opportunity to install a bash plate and number plate riser. The plate riser is such a cheap but nice fix to help really tidy up the car. I'm tempted to now also replace my headlights, on this car. Both items were from Project Aero.    I also needed to replace the rear tyres on the 110, and after trying to get it aligned learnt that I need to replace some bushes in the front end, so that's next.  Closing out this update with a nicer picture as always! 
    • Yeah mate, never miss it.
    • Any going to watch World Time Attack at SMSP this year?
    • Appreciate the correction on the "ground", that will make a huge difference to looking at this. That makes complete sense about AF70/AF71 which is what I had come down to being the issue, one of these. I'll have another look in the ignition wiring when I get a chance next week. I'll also make up a jumper wire for running that AF73 test.  ECU is fine, relay itself is fine, pump harness is fine and the pump itself is fine. I am going to upgrade the Walbro 255 anyway with a DW300 I have since I need to replace the fuel sender and I'm going to upgrade the FPR with my chasebays kit ready for new plenum/injectors/dbw, but I'll get this working first. That's why this is so frustrating. 
×
×
  • Create New...