Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just got back from rim shop - having my GTR wheels redone in the stock colour.

Now the issue I have is I need to find the paint. From what I've been told is the the colour I need is 'JP2 Outback Gold' (pri met) and you all already know it looks like this:

wheelpainted.jpg

Anyone help / point me in right direction as to what the actual/very simialr paint code is (and where I could get it)?

Thanks in advance guys

D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/139213-r34-gtr-wheel-colour-code/
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 year later...

Did the 34 GTR rims come out in 2 different colours, or is it just the light during the photo ?, see pic. I want to paint my rims in the 34 GTR rim colour but some pics i see are GOLD and come are more a GUNMETAL GREY. In FAST there are 2 different part numbers, changing over in late 1999. Anyone know the truth ? or even confirm the correct colour code(s) ? thanks

post-780-1215233415_thumb.jpg

Did the 34 GTR rims come out in 2 different colours, or is it just the light during the photo ?, see pic. I want to paint my rims in the 34 GTR rim colour but some pics i see are GOLD and come are more a GUNMETAL GREY. In FAST there are 2 different part numbers, changing over in late 1999. Anyone know the truth ? or even confirm the correct colour code(s) ? thanks

Hi Chook,

Just like how Andrew says in the Post below, the Nur or M-Nur had a lighter gold colour of which I don't know the code. This is a V-Spec II + extras

Mine is a mid 2000 model which did not change to V-Spec II colour till 09/00 & the colour of the wheels & caps is at the bottom of your pic.

  • 1 month later...

There is no "set" colour.

Its only rough, ive seen 4-5 sets of R34 GTR wheels side by side and they are almost all totally different colours.

Best to get the person spraying them to match them to the colour of the centre caps than using a specific colour code as your likely to have different colours that way.

Cheers :(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...