Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

5656104514_b97dfc3809_z.jpg

KING87 Front_sml by 89CAL, on Flickr

It is a very nice GTR indeed :)

And yeah I'm not about to drop money on crank triggering. If something happens I'll buy a brand new CAS off Kudos which will be fine for the power I'm running. And I am getting pretty over dealing with ATI trying to get answers. I'll give them till the weekend then I think I'll just go with a Ross

I want to get my front windows tinted somewhere, I usually take my car to Nomak for any window/widscreen related stuff but they look hell busy at the moment

Anyone reccomend a good spot to get windows tinted?

Wow, that is a stunning GTR. Not the one i've seen though, i'm quite sure he has personalised plates though something like Dan i can't remember exactly and chrome rims.

Cal- i was going to suggest Nomak, we use them for work reliable and pretty quick

Wow, that is a stunning GTR. Not the one i've seen though, i'm quite sure he has personalised plates though something like Dan i can't remember exactly and chrome rims.

Cal- i was going to suggest Nomak, we use them for work reliable and pretty quick

Ahhhh! no haha

I knew someone (vaguely) with a white 34 gtt. Was a clean car, no diffuser but, unless it has one now with the new owner.

Had an annoying thought today, that my car would look cool without a wing and a carbon fibre BOOT. I'm drawing the line, no more carbon fibre! lol

maybe some canards and a proper carbon spoiler blade first but......

Edited by 89CAL

haha trust me man it turned my head real quick. I have the worst memory, i've quite sure it had a CF diffuser and it definitely had a wing and chrome rims. It looked good but! haha.

Aren't CF hoods defectable? Funny story by the way Cal my girlfriend works with your girlfriend. They were talking about Skylines aparently... HAHA

haha trust me man it turned my head real quick. I have the worst memory, i've quite sure it had a CF diffuser and it definitely had a wing and chrome rims. It looked good but! haha.

Aren't CF hoods defectable? Funny story by the way Cal my girlfriend works with your girlfriend. They were talking about Skylines aparently... HAHA

I already know these things ;)

haha

I meant to say carbon fibre boot to BTW...... whoops

So yes I might edit my post so it makes proper sense.

And yes it probably will be defectable, another good reason not to do it

Edited by 89CAL

I already know these things ;)

haha

I meant to say carbon fibre boot to BTW...... whoops

So yes I might edit my post so it makes proper sense.

And yes it probably will be defectable, another good reason not to do it

You mean you already know about ours missus' or the R34?

True, there's a boot you can get for V35's called strafespeed looks f*cking awesome but the business that runs it does real dodgy work and a lot of people have been ripped off so not going to bother. Almost positive the hood is defectable.

You mean you already know about ours missus' or the R34?

True, there's a boot you can get for V35's called strafespeed looks f*cking awesome but the business that runs it does real dodgy work and a lot of people have been ripped off so not going to bother. Almost positive the hood is defectable.

Girlfriend thing, I put 2 and 2 together a few weeks ago lol

Yeah looks in pretty good condition, GTR's are no good as track cars any more the Evo's are taking over. Most people that i've seen build big track GTR's have sold them after a few track days and bought an Evo

Lil Bro just ran a 9.6sec up in Townsville this arvo, pretty good considering the track is as smooth as conner's road in paget lol. The car is running really well getting consistent 9.6 - 9.7 sec pass even on the low power tune. Looking forward to seeing what it does at willowbank should get a low 9 for sure and its very possible to get the 8sec pass on more HP. Wish i was up there (f**k you work at least the money is good).

Nice work to your brother Ben.

I'm definitely considering an Evo, but for some stupid reason I have always wanted a 400awkw GTR. And something that is easy to get parts for.

EVO will be an expensive buy, and is very close to the price of an R34 GTR. I won't be tracking it that much at all, and I'm not interested in racing and beating anyone, just want to go fast lol.

So confused :P

Will be a sweet daily kingy :)

Rb26/30 at 9.5:1 compression, 2530s, 260 duration cams, decent quiet exhaust, e85 or Jew brew, and a vipec or link with a flex sensor so I can tune it to run on anything I decide to pour into the tank :) would be a torque monster so i dont need boost when driving like a grandma (according to my mates that's often). that's the good thing about knowing how to tune well, I can do a lot of the time consuming and complicated bits myself.

Then a couple of times per year I'll drive to Brisbane for something and stop by the track and go fast. As I said, I'm not very interested in beating anyone, I just want to go fast around a track to get it out of my system :)

Want to loan me that r34 once or twice a year? :P

Went crazy today and put ATF in my gearbox. VE's do it so I thought I'd give it a crack

suprised with it so far to be honest, is handling it quite well

Going to make the switch from Motul 8100 X-cess engine oil to something else though, its just to damn hard to get in this town anymore

Thinking I might go Mobil 1 but will see after a bit more research

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...