Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Powertune sent me a 38 instead of a 44 that I asked for.

The 6boost manifold is for a 44. So i just gotta make an adaptor peice so it can all fit together.

Don't do it. Get the 38 swapped for a 44. You will regret using the 38

ummm also i pretty sure the 38 use the 44 foot.... they just have an insert to make it 38. might wanna check that. the out is 38 but im sure the in is 44 with an insert to make it 38 ;)

I think you are referring to the valve seat. Both have it I think

I got in contact with them today. looks like Im exchanging it for the 44. Thanks for your help, Dan.

Cool mate no worries. I'm not saying you WILL have problems but the chances are fairly high from what we see. Bigger gate is always better and if they are just going to swap it out, it's going to make things a lot easier, not only for boost control but also for fitment by the sounds of it

Just being a dick............

sort of would love to throw some Tial rear housings on the -10's and convert to external gate..... mainly for the whoosh / screamer noises. but eh, that's a lot of effort required.

Just being a dick............

sort of would love to throw some Tial rear housings on the -10's and convert to external gate..... mainly for the whoosh / screamer noises. but eh, that's a lot of effort required.

There are no bad ideas, only bad execution

As far as i know to go the tial housings (no internal wg) id need to get vband dumps made and then work out how i was to plumb the gate/gates onto it all. Custom manis / gates on rear housings

Too much money to really convert imo. Easier to go highmount 30's or just a 51R / 4202 with split pulse!

But i do agree!

Edited by Force Fed

Ben Earl if you still lurk here- Stance Nation fb page just uploaded the sweetest pic of your 32 and Jordans R33 and another guys R34 can't remember his name. Has thousands of likes and tonnes of comments. Must be good to be recognised across the globe man!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You won't need to do that if your happy to learn to tune it yourself. You 100% do not need to do that. It is not part of the learning process. It's not like driving on track and 'finding the limit by stepping over the limit'. You should not ever accidently blow up an engine and you should have setup the ECU's engine protection to save you from yourself while you are learning anyway. Plenty of us have tuned their own cars, myself included. We still come here for advice/guidance/new ideas etc.  What have you been doing so far to learn how to tune?
    • Put the ECU's MAP line in your mouth. Blow as hard as you can. You should be able to see about 10 kPa, maybe 15 kPa positive pressure. Suck on it. You should be able to generate a decent vacuum to about the same level also. Note that this is only ~2 psi either way. If the MAP is reading -5 psi all the time, ignition on, engine running or not, driving around or not, then it is severely f**ked. Also, you SHOULD NOT BE DRIVING IT WITHOUT A LOAD REFERENCE. You will break the engine. Badly.
    • Could be correct. Meter might be that far out. Compare against a known 5 ohm 1% resistor.
    • @Murray_Calavera  If I were an expert I wouldn't be in here looking for assistance.  I am extremely computer literate, have above average understanding on how things should be working and how they should tie together.  If I need to go to a professional tuner so be it, but I'd much rather learn and do things myself even if it means looking for some guidance along the way and blowing up a few engines. @GTSBoy  I was hoping it would be as simple as a large vacuum leak somewhere but I'm unable to find anything, all lines seem to be well capped or going where they need to be, and when removed there is vacuum felt on the tube.  It would be odd for the Haltech built in MAP to be faulty, the GTT tune I imported had it enabled from the start, I incorrectly assumed it was reading a signal from the stock MAP, but that doesn't exist.  After running a vacuum hose to the ECU the signal doesn't change more than 0.2 in either direction.   I'll probably upload a video of my settings tomorrow, as it stands I'm able to daily drive, but getting stuttering when giving it gas from idle, so pulling away from lights is a slow process of revving it up and feathering the clutch until its moving, then it will accelerate fine.  It sounds like I need to get to the bottom of the manifold pressure issue, but the ignition timing section is most intimidating to me and will probably let a pro do that part.  Tomorrow I'll try a different vacuum line to T off of, with any luck I selected one that was already bypassed during the DBW swap.  (edit: I went out and did it right now, the line I had chosen did appear to have no vacuum on it, it used to go to the front of the intake, I've now completely blocked that one off at the bracket that holds several vacuum lines by the firewall.  I T'd into the vacuum line that goes from that bracket to the vacuum pump at the front of the car, but no change in the MAP readings).  Using the new vacuum line that has obvious vacuum on the hose, im still only getting readings between -6.0 and -5.2.  I'm wondering why the ECU was detecting -5.3 when nothing was connected to the MAP nipple and ECU MAP selected as the source. @feartherb26  I do have +T in the works but wanted to wait until Spring to start with that swap since this is my good winter AWD vehicle.  When removing the butterfly, did it leave a bunch of holes in the manifold that you needed to plug?  I thought about removing it but assumed it would be a mess.   I notice no difference when capping the vacuum line to it or letting it do its thing.  This whole thing has convinced me to just get a forward facing manifold when the time comes though.
    • Update: tested my spark plugs that are supposed to be 5ohms with a 10% deviation and one gave me a 0 ohms reading and the rest were 3.9ohm<, so one bad and the others on their way out.
×
×
  • Create New...