Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

what about a T78-33D? or are they borderline BFOT?

I'd say a T78 is pretty much BFOT territory, similar to T04Z - and aren't you trying to get around that?

If you're looking down the Trust path, TD-07S is smaller.

So is it still SST, or are you thinking of something a bit larger?

I'd say a T78 is pretty much BFOT territory, similar to T04Z - and aren't you trying to get around that?

If you're looking down the Trust path, TD-07S is smaller.

So is it still SST, or are you thinking of something a bit larger?

I would like to see the results of an HKS T04Z with the .61 rear used on a standard displacement RB26 ;)

would go quite well no doubt.

I was running 3037s56t on rb25, it was nuts, made well over 300rwkw, made strong boost under 4k rpm - and not one garrett name brand came anywhere near the sort of response/power I was making - infact I have never seen a garrett generic turbo make near the same power/response/toque/spool as the HKS did. (but that is a different topic.

On RB26, no doubt the 3037 would be a very sweet thing indeed.

for the twin set-up I want I'd need:

HKS 2530s

for SST

HKS 3037

Not a good comparison, 2530's would get you up around 400 rwkw (not 300 rwkw). I think 2510's would be a better choice if 300 rwkw is your target. But having driven several GTR's with 2530's they would be my choice with around 350 4wkw. They make a NICE circuit car, perhaps why the Mines R34GTR has 2530's on it, as does the re-released Nismo R32 Ztune.

;) cheers :D

I was running 3037s56t on rb25, it was nuts, made well over 300rwkw, made strong boost under 4k rpm - and not one garrett name brand came anywhere near the sort of response/power I was making - infact I have never seen a garrett generic turbo make near the same power/response/toque/spool as the HKS did.

You haven't looked hard enough, GCG supplied GT3040 = 325 rwkw with 1 bar at 3,750 rpm. It's all in the tuning, spend $200 extra on that and save $1K on the turbo

;) cheers :D

700HP-GTR33 I certainly hope you're kidding around because thats a ridiculous suggestion that unless they have 2 turbos, a GTR is not a GTR!!

Have a look next track day and see how (especially a certain) big single GTRs go. The days of useless BFOTs has passed, there is absolutely no reason a single can't do what twins do.

Back on topic T78 is way too BFOT, T04Z is awesome in comparison, 500rwhp @ 19psi with delivery by 4500rpm not being strictly on/off either, with the .81 rear. I'd track back towards something like a GT3037, GT3040 for the lower power level.

yes, well my car was tuned at the same place other guys had their gt30s done - does this mean I could have had alot more than 321? most likely, a japanese mech seemed to think it was a bit low...

would love to see a dyno graph for this gt3040, sounds like it worked unusually well, as there was another guy on here who fitted one (gcg) and he hated the thing - ended up going hks 3040 and fell in love.

As Gary mentioned, for 300rwkw on a twin setup,you want the most efficient turbos you can find so you would either search for a set of HKS GT2510's, or for the newer option, GT-SS's.

Both will comfortably reach the power goal and its already a well known fact that for response, its hard to go past GT-SS's, especially at ~$3,000 for a complete kit (Half the cost of the proposed SST setup!)

Speaking of the GT-SS Turbo.

My friend just bought a turbo and was told it was HKS GT-SS turbo.

It only has Garrett written on the housing but I don't recall if HKS actually put their name on all HKS turbos?

The core has this written on it:

HJ 0188J

GT S

472560-14

Can anyone confirm? :)

Edited by GTR-Ben

thanks for the input. good to get the SAU brains trust on this one.

nick, you are right, HKS GT-SS are the proven option and very good value at $3K, but you do need to factor in twin dumps and front pipes which would be much cheaper on the SST set-up with just one simple dump, and one simple front pipe.

Gary, I hear you on the 2530s too. They would be my other choice I think.

Morgs, I will heed that advice and put the T78 in the BFOT bag. but definately considering one of the small T04Zs.

What housing A/Rs do they come in (both ex and comp).

Something around .81 rear and a .60 front could be good depending on physical size/wheel size/trim. Should be good for 350rwkw and hopefully full boost before 4000rpm. basically whatever turbo I end up with I'd want the wastegate (s) cracked open before 4000. otherwise it's not really going to do it for me on street or track for that matter.

I would like to see the results of an HKS T04Z with the .61 rear used on a standard displacement RB26 :)

Speak to Dave (T04GTR) about his

Its a bit laggy, but the top end is quite a rush

Someone lock this thread....too may good ideas floating around.

Does anyone know the details of the IHI turbos the Z-Tune uses?

If its a track car, then i say stick with low mount twins and std manifolds and heat shields. Controlling the heat with a single and tubular manifold is a bitch on the track. And the heat from a little RB20 setup is going to be less then 300-330rwkws.

Agreed, Fernis cars is pretty damn impressive. I mean its pretty damn impressive :)

If its a track car, then i say stick with low mount twins and std manifolds and heat shields. Controlling the heat with a single and tubular manifold is a bitch on the track. And the heat from a little RB20 setup is going to be less then 300-330rwkws.

that is a good point. heat will definately be a problem. but damn we love the gate. and i know you do too.

that is a good point. heat will definately be a problem. but damn we love the gate. and i know you do too.

Yeh new engine will have gate...though with the change to a smaller turbo and more displacement you might get too much gate and need to plumb it back :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...