Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I think Nismoid you are mistaken.

I have 330rwkws on a rear wheel dyno and 260awkws on a 4 wheel drive dyno.

Both are different.

gtr32 has already the 320kws at the wheels he is asking for help with mods

to get him to 400rwkws.

Tuners also give you results in shoot out mode because it is a higher value.

In shoot out mode I have 370 rwkws with the 2530's,set at 1.3 bar

I will though clarify with my tuner tommorrow ,but of what I have read this is a correct statement.

Thanks for you help Nismoid in bringing this to my attention.

Cheers. :)

  • Replies 281
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I think Nismoid you are mistaken.

I have 330rwkws on a rear wheel dyno and 260awkws on a 4 wheel drive dyno.

Both are different.

gtr32 has already the 320kws at the wheels he is asking for help with mods

to get him to 400rwkws.

Tuners also give you results in shoot out mode because it is a higher value.

In shoot out mode I have 370 rwkws with the 2530's,set at 1.3 bar

I will though clarify with my tuner tommorrow ,but of what I have read this is a correct statement.

Thanks for you help Nismoid in bringing this to my attention.

Cheers. :)

Im definately not mistaken. Please stop bringing mis-information into the thread.

I know what im talking about.

He does NOT have 320rwkw, thats what he wants. I dont know if you've read the first post correctly either.

He is looking for a turbo upgrade, ie, he doesnt have upgraded turbos as yet.

And he does not want 400rwkw. :P:rolleyes:

There is no way going from AWD ro RWD you loose 70rwkw

Thats madness and very very very incorrect

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...3&hl=*awkw*

Scroll down the Dirtgarage's post. Sums up what we are talking about here.

Simple enough to find using the search function, so not sure where you have "read" that awkw/rwkw is a 70kw difference, as its never been posted as such on this forum that i know of as its just rubbish :)

this correct. looking for 320awkw have well i dont no. my car is going on a dyno tommorrow so it will interesting to see how much power my car has...

exhaust,.9 bar of boost..so about 180kw yes.

by the way i have a faIR idea of the cars condition as it has only 89xxxx on (i no this could be incorrect)but the rest of the car seems to tell me its about right.

before i bought the car i made the bloke get a comp test at rigolis and all come back 150 throughout the 6....makes no funny noises and motor sounds tight?

say i had the cash would it be worth putting a n1 oil pump and collar?

kane

also the dyno im putting my car on is rearwheel dyno! i was just going to pull the 4wd fuse? will this be 100% rear wheel drive or cou;ld maybe slip some how fronts spin a little? just i dont want this top happen

to put a collar on = motor out.

So its not worth it unless your rebuilding it.

RWD - i think the fuse is ok on the R32 GTR.

You could always just drop the drive shaft, thats what R33/R34 owners have to do, takes a few mins, nothing major

044 needs cradle modification. Nismo pumps bolt straight in but cost ~$200 more :devil:

....Also i think you means 9psi?! or is it 0.9bar?!

....Oh, I see the 'point' now :wave:, I say you could expect closer to 200-210rwkw if you your not talking awkw

Sorry, theyre $230 and theyre an intank swap for your old one

the cradle needs slight modification but nothing the backyard mechanic cant do

theres a tutorial for the 32gtr in the tutorial section...have a look!

thanks slippery, ill have a look..

also i got a quote for nismo afm. $480 each... i think ill just stick with the stockies and see if they bottom out as im not sure when they would??? ideas?????

Dirtgarage tested RW & AW it, 1kw difference which is nothing but dyno variance at its best.

This only seems to work on a Dynolog (Mainline) Dyno...i don't know why but Dyno Dynamics reads higher in RW...dunno why...it just does.

We have been able to "spike" the figure in RW on a DD dyno by only about 30kw which seems about right on a 450AWKW car.

BUT...this is not a dyno thread so sorry to get off topic.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...