Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I think Nismoid you are mistaken.

I have 330rwkws on a rear wheel dyno and 260awkws on a 4 wheel drive dyno.

Both are different.

gtr32 has already the 320kws at the wheels he is asking for help with mods

to get him to 400rwkws.

Tuners also give you results in shoot out mode because it is a higher value.

In shoot out mode I have 370 rwkws with the 2530's,set at 1.3 bar

I will though clarify with my tuner tommorrow ,but of what I have read this is a correct statement.

Thanks for you help Nismoid in bringing this to my attention.

Cheers. :)

  • Replies 281
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I think Nismoid you are mistaken.

I have 330rwkws on a rear wheel dyno and 260awkws on a 4 wheel drive dyno.

Both are different.

gtr32 has already the 320kws at the wheels he is asking for help with mods

to get him to 400rwkws.

Tuners also give you results in shoot out mode because it is a higher value.

In shoot out mode I have 370 rwkws with the 2530's,set at 1.3 bar

I will though clarify with my tuner tommorrow ,but of what I have read this is a correct statement.

Thanks for you help Nismoid in bringing this to my attention.

Cheers. :)

Im definately not mistaken. Please stop bringing mis-information into the thread.

I know what im talking about.

He does NOT have 320rwkw, thats what he wants. I dont know if you've read the first post correctly either.

He is looking for a turbo upgrade, ie, he doesnt have upgraded turbos as yet.

And he does not want 400rwkw. :P:rolleyes:

There is no way going from AWD ro RWD you loose 70rwkw

Thats madness and very very very incorrect

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...3&hl=*awkw*

Scroll down the Dirtgarage's post. Sums up what we are talking about here.

Simple enough to find using the search function, so not sure where you have "read" that awkw/rwkw is a 70kw difference, as its never been posted as such on this forum that i know of as its just rubbish :)

this correct. looking for 320awkw have well i dont no. my car is going on a dyno tommorrow so it will interesting to see how much power my car has...

exhaust,.9 bar of boost..so about 180kw yes.

by the way i have a faIR idea of the cars condition as it has only 89xxxx on (i no this could be incorrect)but the rest of the car seems to tell me its about right.

before i bought the car i made the bloke get a comp test at rigolis and all come back 150 throughout the 6....makes no funny noises and motor sounds tight?

say i had the cash would it be worth putting a n1 oil pump and collar?

kane

also the dyno im putting my car on is rearwheel dyno! i was just going to pull the 4wd fuse? will this be 100% rear wheel drive or cou;ld maybe slip some how fronts spin a little? just i dont want this top happen

to put a collar on = motor out.

So its not worth it unless your rebuilding it.

RWD - i think the fuse is ok on the R32 GTR.

You could always just drop the drive shaft, thats what R33/R34 owners have to do, takes a few mins, nothing major

044 needs cradle modification. Nismo pumps bolt straight in but cost ~$200 more :devil:

....Also i think you means 9psi?! or is it 0.9bar?!

....Oh, I see the 'point' now :wave:, I say you could expect closer to 200-210rwkw if you your not talking awkw

Sorry, theyre $230 and theyre an intank swap for your old one

the cradle needs slight modification but nothing the backyard mechanic cant do

theres a tutorial for the 32gtr in the tutorial section...have a look!

thanks slippery, ill have a look..

also i got a quote for nismo afm. $480 each... i think ill just stick with the stockies and see if they bottom out as im not sure when they would??? ideas?????

Dirtgarage tested RW & AW it, 1kw difference which is nothing but dyno variance at its best.

This only seems to work on a Dynolog (Mainline) Dyno...i don't know why but Dyno Dynamics reads higher in RW...dunno why...it just does.

We have been able to "spike" the figure in RW on a DD dyno by only about 30kw which seems about right on a 450AWKW car.

BUT...this is not a dyno thread so sorry to get off topic.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...