Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 281
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

after reading a mighty good thread on small singles or even big singles on gtrs i decided to stay low mount twin! it was going to cost well over my budget anyway?

i am only looking for around 300-320awkw this is what i think ill need,if there is anything missing or i have something there that isnt needed would be great if yous could let me no?

pfc+hand controller

550cc injectors

z32 afm+plugs

front pipes(just jap or should i get hks)

cam 260 duration 9.1 lift

cam gears

new cooler core

fuel reg

oil cooler and relocater

now with turbos this is where i would have to be careful so not to blow the budget

so ive seen some r32 gtr n1 spec turbos for about $1200 what are these thinngs like if someone could shed some light

gt-ss bit pricy but would the best option

gt2860r with either -5-7 not sure what these are like b ut sound good for $2700

so any help would be greatfully appreciated

regards kane

Howdy Kane GT-SS from nengun http://www.nengun.com/forced-induction/2 only $2650 and you get all the good studs gasket sets . Thats the path I,m taking Never had any problems with Nengun good exchange rate at the moment .They cost over double here too many greedy people here.

Delivery cost is neglible.

good luck with it

ike

Howdy Kane GT-SS from nengun http://www.nengun.com/forced-induction/2 only $2650 and you get all the good studs gasket sets . Thats the path I,m taking Never had any problems with Nengun good exchange rate at the moment .They cost over double here too many greedy people here.

Delivery cost is neglible.

good luck with it

ike

Add GST and import duties if picked up by customs.... more than $3k....

  • 2 weeks later...

was all ready to install the turbos 2day until i seen the blooody justjap dumps have a massive whole for the o2 sensor,so i pulled the reducers out the stock dumps to find they also dont fit?

does anyone no if the 33/34 gtr o2 sensors are bigger and they may have sent the wrong dumps? i will ring tomorrow and ask however..

what ya get for buying cheaper parts.should have bought the hks ones i liked from nengun...

A user on the UK GTR tried this, his user name was T.F.S.

with the ignition timing done my next step is to look at the fuelling.....the car has a wideband fitted now so fuelling is displayed in the cockpit, just checking it at idle told me that this engine was running very rich....as the engine warmed up it went as rich as 10.1:1 and it would net go into closed loop

(more infomation on fuelling in www.max-boost.co.uk)

the first step in this instance is to check the lambda sensors, the two oxygen sensors on the exhaust side provide critical infomation to the ECU for fuelling in "closed loop" operation, these sensors can be checked with a multimeter at tickover....output from the siginal wire on the sensor lead should be in the region of 0.6-0.9 (roughly) if it is alive

both of mine seemed totally dead, no output at all...the logical explaination for this is faulty sensors but it turned out that there was more to this.....

R32 came with 24 pin chip ECU and small lambda sensors with red siginal wires, R33 came with 14 pin chip ECU and larger bosch lambda sensors with black siginal wires

the looms also have slight differences with the lanbda siginal and heater wires

mine has a 32 ECU with 33 sensors so i simply rewired the sensors so that the siginal wire matched up with the ECU side

with these 33 sensors now working on the 32 ECU they were changed for new versions (£60 each from justlambda.co.uk) and run fine going by the output from my wideband

Make of it what you will.

Are you running the Power FC? If so, just disable the closed loop feedback and run with bungs!

If you get eager to optimize fuel economy (or if you guys need O2 sensors to avoid getting defected) you can fit O2 sensors later.

Can't wait to hear how she goes!

Dan

Kane

Sounds like you got the rebuild blues.

Doing the same with mine. Custom 3" dumps/front pipes are the hold up. W/E 16/17 Feb should see them done (again) and the engine off the bench and back in the car.

Really curious as to how the cars compare as my mods are pretty well the same - 2860-5, PFC (+EBC), pipes, 700cc inj, fuel pump, adj cam gears, sump baffle, oil cooler, JB clutch, timing belt. Same sort of target rwhp.

As you have no doubt found, it all adds up really quickly.

Stick with it and keep us updated.

Cheers

thanks alot for the feed back fellas.

sure do have rebiuld blues,hold ups everywhere.but hey all makes things worth waiting for at the end?

whats involved in disabling the close loop and what sort of fuel economy will i have? as in does it make a huge diff? did come with bungs yes?

thanks again and i cant wait for the thing to me on the road.

thanks alot for the feed back fellas.

sure do have rebiuld blues,hold ups everywhere.but hey all makes things worth waiting for at the end?

whats involved in disabling the close loop and what sort of fuel economy will i have? as in does it make a huge diff? did come with bungs yes?

thanks again and i cant wait for the thing to me on the road.

simple dont do it, it's not worth it, trust me a little time delay now you'll save yourself alot down the road. Get the O2 sensors in properly or you'll pay for it 10 fold down the road.

my 2c

ps i run 500rwhp+ and still maintain 500km per tank normal driving as do many of the well tune gtr's in WA the close loop system helps trust me.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...