Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

OK, for my insane build i am gunna be getting another Head, basically a NEO head for a couple reason

1) Solid Lifters

2) Can get it machined with less downtime

3) VVT

Ok, my questions are will there be any issues with head stud location using this new head ? or oil and water lines ? also wut about the wiring for the vvt, i know the sii has NVCS which is only on inlet cam and the neo has it both, also i am not using a stock ecu i am using a haltch e6k, my plan is to get the head, take to machine shop get it polished, ported, remove squish area (per JUN) ...actually gunna do EXACTLY wut they did as listed here http://www.junauto.co.jp/processing/rb26/index.html html, but withouy all the fancy jazz will the head bolt on and will the vvt be working with minor wiring or any at all

The Neo only has VVT on the inlet, just like the R33.

You will have to be careful, as the Neo head is considerably different to the R33 head.

I think almost to the point of not being compatible with the R33 block.

cheers

Pete

The Neo only has VVT on the inlet, just like the R33.

You will have to be careful, as the Neo head is considerably different to the R33 head.

I think almost to the point of not being compatible with the R33 block.

cheers

Pete

hmm i was told it has it on exh as well as the intake hmmmm here aresome pics of the head

20040205image0015jm5.jpg

20040205image0017pl6.jpg

20040205image0016bf2.jpg

Head and manifolds will bolt on as they are they same bolt pattern as r33, everything else lines up to r33 block, dont forget to use oil restrictors. VVT is on the inlet cam only, but it is variable, so to control it properly, you need to use a 3d map with a PWModulated output, which your computer doesn't have. Also your CAS will not bolt to the exhaust cam. If your going for something extreme, im assuming you would put cams in. R32 gtr cams fir and allowyour cas to bolt in, but you will lose the vct, just fit some camwheels, as it will be heaps cheaper then trying to setup the vct on the dyno with a shipload of load pionts that need to be setup. Also dont forget you will need completely different pistons as the neo has much smaller combustion chambers which will increse to compresion rtio by approx 1

Adriano.

I thought the Neo head wouldn't fit for some reason. Have you fitted one before?

The Neo also has the same compression as R33...... How could it change compression?

Yes ive fitted one to an rb30. Neo's have flat top pistons and a small cc in the head, wheras r33's have dome pistons and a larger cc in the head. It is about 11cc difference, so if you ran a neo head with r33 pistons the c:r will end up at 10:1. Also the nea has bigger inlet valves.

The casting is pretty good, i wouldn't bother porting it unless you are after 700hp or more. A set of 2nd hand gtr cams with the aerospeed camgears will be a pretty good setup athough you wil lose a small amount of lowdown torque due to the bigger cams and no vct, but you really end up with a gtr head without the hassles of manifolds.

now that i didnt know, refering to the combustion chambers, i am running a rb26 crank, with machined rods from thagards speed shop, and wiseco 87mm rb26 pistons so i am at 8.0ish, i would love to be 9.0 but the vvt issue really converns me, do u think it would be wiser to just keep the nvcs that is on the rb25, and use the neos solid lifters, and buy the tomei procams which require solid lifters

Obviously neo specific cams would be preferred, especially if you get poncams or such, however if you dont have a computer that can control it then the variable vct is wasted, especially if the cams are ground to siut the vct. Also a r32 and early r33's have a different drive to the cas on the front of the exhaust cam, so you need to see which drive you need for your cas. If you need to get rid of the vct, i would get an r32 gtr inlet cam, with a camwheel, as it is cheap, adjustable, and has fairly good lift and duration. On the exhaust i would run whichever cam you need to run your cas

I have a NEO head on RB30 bottom end, running HKS 272 / 9.35 cams.

Im using the the R33 CAS with the cams, as its in a R33 4 door with power fc. Like Adriano said, they are a smaller combustion chamber with VCT on the inlet only, not that Im using it. As for stricnynel0s, dont stress too much about the VCT as RB26's dont use it and they make enough power with out it :-)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...