Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

OK, for my insane build i am gunna be getting another Head, basically a NEO head for a couple reason

1) Solid Lifters

2) Can get it machined with less downtime

3) VVT

Ok, my questions are will there be any issues with head stud location using this new head ? or oil and water lines ? also wut about the wiring for the vvt, i know the sii has NVCS which is only on inlet cam and the neo has it both, also i am not using a stock ecu i am using a haltch e6k, my plan is to get the head, take to machine shop get it polished, ported, remove squish area (per JUN) ...actually gunna do EXACTLY wut they did as listed here http://www.junauto.co.jp/processing/rb26/index.html html, but withouy all the fancy jazz will the head bolt on and will the vvt be working with minor wiring or any at all

The Neo only has VVT on the inlet, just like the R33.

You will have to be careful, as the Neo head is considerably different to the R33 head.

I think almost to the point of not being compatible with the R33 block.

cheers

Pete

The Neo only has VVT on the inlet, just like the R33.

You will have to be careful, as the Neo head is considerably different to the R33 head.

I think almost to the point of not being compatible with the R33 block.

cheers

Pete

hmm i was told it has it on exh as well as the intake hmmmm here aresome pics of the head

20040205image0015jm5.jpg

20040205image0017pl6.jpg

20040205image0016bf2.jpg

Head and manifolds will bolt on as they are they same bolt pattern as r33, everything else lines up to r33 block, dont forget to use oil restrictors. VVT is on the inlet cam only, but it is variable, so to control it properly, you need to use a 3d map with a PWModulated output, which your computer doesn't have. Also your CAS will not bolt to the exhaust cam. If your going for something extreme, im assuming you would put cams in. R32 gtr cams fir and allowyour cas to bolt in, but you will lose the vct, just fit some camwheels, as it will be heaps cheaper then trying to setup the vct on the dyno with a shipload of load pionts that need to be setup. Also dont forget you will need completely different pistons as the neo has much smaller combustion chambers which will increse to compresion rtio by approx 1

Adriano.

I thought the Neo head wouldn't fit for some reason. Have you fitted one before?

The Neo also has the same compression as R33...... How could it change compression?

Yes ive fitted one to an rb30. Neo's have flat top pistons and a small cc in the head, wheras r33's have dome pistons and a larger cc in the head. It is about 11cc difference, so if you ran a neo head with r33 pistons the c:r will end up at 10:1. Also the nea has bigger inlet valves.

The casting is pretty good, i wouldn't bother porting it unless you are after 700hp or more. A set of 2nd hand gtr cams with the aerospeed camgears will be a pretty good setup athough you wil lose a small amount of lowdown torque due to the bigger cams and no vct, but you really end up with a gtr head without the hassles of manifolds.

now that i didnt know, refering to the combustion chambers, i am running a rb26 crank, with machined rods from thagards speed shop, and wiseco 87mm rb26 pistons so i am at 8.0ish, i would love to be 9.0 but the vvt issue really converns me, do u think it would be wiser to just keep the nvcs that is on the rb25, and use the neos solid lifters, and buy the tomei procams which require solid lifters

Obviously neo specific cams would be preferred, especially if you get poncams or such, however if you dont have a computer that can control it then the variable vct is wasted, especially if the cams are ground to siut the vct. Also a r32 and early r33's have a different drive to the cas on the front of the exhaust cam, so you need to see which drive you need for your cas. If you need to get rid of the vct, i would get an r32 gtr inlet cam, with a camwheel, as it is cheap, adjustable, and has fairly good lift and duration. On the exhaust i would run whichever cam you need to run your cas

I have a NEO head on RB30 bottom end, running HKS 272 / 9.35 cams.

Im using the the R33 CAS with the cams, as its in a R33 4 door with power fc. Like Adriano said, they are a smaller combustion chamber with VCT on the inlet only, not that Im using it. As for stricnynel0s, dont stress too much about the VCT as RB26's dont use it and they make enough power with out it :-)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...