Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi

been wondering few things, straighten me out!!

1- if race cars want their suspension so stiff, so they can control car better, why don't they have a steel rod instead of springs~~ 100% rigid...

2-the idea behind fuel injectors is that the fuel is sprayed into mist form such that combustion is efficient, no?

if that is the case let's say we have a 4 cylinder 1.6l engine, means each cylinder 0.4l....instead of doing that why don't we create sumthing along the line of 10 cylinder 0.16l each ~~...so smaller injectors and more efficient...just make the system high reving~~

3-S2000 is famous for it's weight balance 50:50, handling is good. So isn't stereo sytem in the boot good? balance out the weight~~ like those sky scraper with dynamic counterweights to prevent swinging....so all we have left is to increase more power to overcome the extra 50kg or so~~ but heys, better handling

4-the better the flow of exhaust in turbocharged system the better right? so why do the WRC cars bother to put in exhaust at all...they might as well have a heat shield under the engine bay and remove the pipe all together? free flow exhaust~~

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143430-my-weird-logic/
Share on other sites

1) Because the chassis will literally bounce off the track if its not twisted into a pretzel shape.

2) Money, its cheap, people are cheap. People buy cheap before they buy good. Oh, and torque, larger pistons, crankshafts and flywheels produce more torque as not everyone likes a 4000rpm launch

3) S2000's are over-rated, $10k car + $3-4k suspension and tyres = S2000 handling

All weight is bad, removing weight from the front like essential items, batteries and so forth is a much easier way.

4) Carbon Monoxide + carbon dioxide, a dozen other types of poisoning and going deaf.

Edited by MK2
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143430-my-weird-logic/#findComment-2675359
Share on other sites

hi

been wondering few things, straighten me out!!

1- if race cars want their suspension so stiff, so they can control car better, why don't they have a steel rod instead of springs~~ 100% rigid...

2-the idea behind fuel injectors is that the fuel is sprayed into mist form such that combustion is efficient, no?

if that is the case let's say we have a 4 cylinder 1.6l engine, means each cylinder 0.4l....instead of doing that why don't we create sumthing along the line of 10 cylinder 0.16l each ~~...so smaller injectors and more efficient...just make the system high reving~~

3-S2000 is famous for it's weight balance 50:50, handling is good. So isn't stereo sytem in the boot good? balance out the weight~~ like those sky scraper with dynamic counterweights to prevent swinging....so all we have left is to increase more power to overcome the extra 50kg or so~~ but heys, better handling

4-the better the flow of exhaust in turbocharged system the better right? so why do the WRC cars bother to put in exhaust at all...they might as well have a heat shield under the engine bay and remove the pipe all together? free flow exhaust~~

1 - imagine there was NO give at all and you went over a pothole... the top would shoot out the mount

2 - expense/size

3 - if you could lighten the front end of a car to the same weight of a couple of subbies and an amp then that would be a good idea maybe, but you cant

4 - turbulence issues.. but i am quite uneducated in this exacty

5 - Moved to general automotive discussion

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143430-my-weird-logic/#findComment-2675375
Share on other sites

#1 they dont. Its mostly the roll they want to get rid of. But they still want movement so the wheels are in constant contact (grip) with the road. Ridged bars dont do that. Drifters however may as well go the bars.

#2 expence, size, weight, engineering complexity, rev happy no torque, and they have the tech these days to not need to. Look 1.6L engines are making more power than V8s were 30 years ago (obviously stock for stock)

#3 If you went to a concert and the band was standing up the front, but the sound was coming from behind you... The idea of the stereo is to attempt to recreat real life, ie sound from infront of you, such as it would be live and unpluged. As in singers voice up front in the middle, drums up back and spread out a bit, etc etc. If its in the back you just wont get that.

#4 WRC cars still need to be road registered. And in some cases the police have stepped in if they are speeding between competive stages, if the car is just that smashed up etc. Also, can you imagion anti-lag in an engine bay full of wires and hoses?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143430-my-weird-logic/#findComment-2675414
Share on other sites

hi

been wondering few things, straighten me out!!

1- if race cars want their suspension so stiff, so they can control car better, why don't they have a steel rod instead of springs~~ 100% rigid...

2-the idea behind fuel injectors is that the fuel is sprayed into mist form such that combustion is efficient, no?

if that is the case let's say we have a 4 cylinder 1.6l engine, means each cylinder 0.4l....instead of doing that why don't we create sumthing along the line of 10 cylinder 0.16l each ~~...so smaller injectors and more efficient...just make the system high reving~~

3-S2000 is famous for it's weight balance 50:50, handling is good. So isn't stereo sytem in the boot good? balance out the weight~~ like those sky scraper with dynamic counterweights to prevent swinging....so all we have left is to increase more power to overcome the extra 50kg or so~~ but heys, better handling

4-the better the flow of exhaust in turbocharged system the better right? so why do the WRC cars bother to put in exhaust at all...they might as well have a heat shield under the engine bay and remove the pipe all together? free flow exhaust~~

1. imagine coming into a turn hard under brakes, you hit the smallest of bumps, you bounce off the road, so you've lost 2m of effective braking, and u lock up aswell, going straight not around the corner.

2. no useable torque range. to have any effect u'd wanna hit 15,000 rpm. if you can get an F1 car to pass EPA, let me know :P

3. if you want supreme handling, the sound system is the first thing to go to try and save weight, if you want music, you have it in front of you, except the sub, noises below about 200hz arent directional (i think, lol) aerodynamics and downforce is way better than adding weight/moving wieght for handling. also, weight balance is good, but its not the only thing that makes the S2000 a good handling car, chassis design/setup etc has a big effect.

4. yeh last time i heard they had to be road regiestered (with certain exceptions of course, they have special rego), but other than that i dont see why they dont just run a dump pipe and just end it there....

edit - as for the V10, production/production costs/effort required to put one together as opposed to a 4cyl. you have an extra 6 cylders to drop in, 6 extra rods, and also everything is smaller so its harder to work with, but overall the motor would be heaps bigger IMO, which leads me to my last point... packaging... V10>toyota corolla :)

Edited by VB-
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143430-my-weird-logic/#findComment-2675624
Share on other sites

the first 3 have been dealt with

the 4th one - 1 they have to be road legal (they are production cars - they get them standard from factory, and can only change certain things and only a certain amount

and 2 if there is no exhaust pipe, there is a pressure difference created by the expelling of the exhaust gases, and air will rush in from around the turbo, and try to go BACKWARDS through the turbo - just like nitro funny drag cars, with all there power, still have short exhaust headers for that reason - exhaust coming straight out the head means that air rushes in past the gas backwards into the engine - which is not good

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143430-my-weird-logic/#findComment-2675800
Share on other sites

huumm

1-the first one, well they could strengthten the mount of the suspension, I meant if the car is for track work..so won't be potholes

2-okay second one is well justified...

3-its not about sound quality, more to the handling bit, the subs are light but the solid wood box has considerable weight + the level arm from car cetre to rear end of car is larger than level arm to engine. The weight at the back will help with traction, no?

4-why issit they can use missfire system if its meant to be road legal then

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143430-my-weird-logic/#findComment-2675827
Share on other sites

woops read it wrong (no4)

anyway the missfire system:

what it is, is a system that, on upshifts, retards the ignition just a fraction, so it actually ignites the mixture when the exhaust is opening - thus keeping the turbo spooled up (as the force keeps the turbine wheel spinning madly) and allows immediate power delivery ie no lag

tell you the truth - i dont no

Edited by usherly
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143430-my-weird-logic/#findComment-2675845
Share on other sites

1. might work if you were racing on 100% pure flat concrete.

2. hate to tow a trailer with a 1.6L v10 .

3. need to find out what your weight balance is first. then you need to get it at the right height, and get it centred so it doesn't affect your left/right balance. but you'd be better off relocating current parts to help the balance. then retune your suspension.

4. as ash said, legality, and to maintain power. you will hear people talking about 'tuned length headers'. you need a certain length of exhaust to create a scavenging effect. this syphons the air out of the chamber.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143430-my-weird-logic/#findComment-2675858
Share on other sites

1) You still need weight transfer. If there is no movement in the suspension, then all tyres will be loaded evenly. Therefore when you go to turn, there won't be enough grip on the outside tyres and the car will therefore want to go straight ahead. When you put load onto the outside tyres, they press down onto the road, and will grip better to help you to go around the turn.

However there is no point for a racecar to go too soft in suspension either, because then the inside tyres will be too unloaded and having only two tyres doing the gripping isn't good.

2,3,4) The other questions have been answered suffiently IMO.

Edited by Thunderbolt
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143430-my-weird-logic/#findComment-2675885
Share on other sites

You still need weight transfer. If there is no movement in the suspension, then all tyres will be loaded evenly. Therefore when you go to turn, there won't be enough grip on the outside tyres and the car will therefore want to go straight ahead. When you put load onto the outside tyres, they press down onto the road, and will grip better to help you to go around the turn.

thats not quite right. the laws of gravity and inertia still act on the car so the outside tyres will still get more load as the force of turning still loads up the outside. however the inside of the tyres will lift off the ground. if having solid suspension meant that all 4 wheels had even loading even around corners the car would literally handle like it was on rails.

4-why issit they can use missfire system if its meant to be road legal then

they aren't registered as road cars, but under a class of sports vehicles. they are only allowed to do limited driving on the road. you can't just pop down to the shops in it.

and the missfire system you are talking about is anti-lag. ash was almost spot on. the system is designed so that at low load (like when decellerating) the timing is retarded so much that the fuel isn't ignited by the spark plug. instead on the exhaust stroke the unburnt fuel gets pushed out onto the hot headers and explodes. this keeps the turbo spinning much faster and means that the car is never running vacuum. they can be setup to run 5, 10 or even 15psi at idle. but when driven on the road they usually change the ecu settings to remove the anti-lag.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143430-my-weird-logic/#findComment-2676485
Share on other sites

On 4, have you ever heard an engine running without a muffler? Even a turbo engine, at idle, makes quite a noise. Now imagine multiplying that up to 8000 rpm.

As in all things in car design, it's all a compromise.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143430-my-weird-logic/#findComment-2676555
Share on other sites

A car WILL actually produce MORE power, with the exhaust system COMPLETELY removed (IE Take the headers off)

The huge urban myth though is, it reduces power because you have no "back pressure", which, is total and utter shit.

Go, grab an old school engine (Say a old Corolla) Wack it on the dyno standard, then throw on a well suited "sports" exhaust and retune the car. Then remove the exhaust system leaving only the headers, retune the car. Now, remove the headers, You'll quite happily find, you have more power with no exhaust at all, BUT, you'll have one big head ache!

To gain more power by removing the exhaust, you actually have to dial in a little bit more fuel, AND advance the timing a few degrees.

As for anti-lag: 8% extra fuel. Ignition retard by about 45 degrees, so fires at about 30 degrees ATDC. Cyclic fuel cut to control RPM.

It is NOT the exhaust making the fuel ignite.

As has been said though, no exhaust, = VERY noisy.

Oh and as for the dragsters with exhausts... It's done to move the exhaust AWAY from componentry and so that it doesn't destroy the car/driver/essentials...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143430-my-weird-logic/#findComment-2677268
Share on other sites

The handling of a stock S2000 isn't that good. It might have a 50:50 weight distribution, but with the suspension geometry the rear tends to break away and do it suddenly.

There are quite a few people on a 350Z forum I'm on that bought their cars with the insurance payout they got after wrapping their S2000s around telegraph poles. Most of them did it the same way. Cornering hard, the tail savagely breaks loose with no forewarning. With the short wheelbase they either spin, or get into a tank slapper.

Even the local mags say that the back end of an S2000 is a mystery. Up until 8/10 its fine, but when you push it harder it starts getting really spooky.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143430-my-weird-logic/#findComment-2679658
Share on other sites

1-the first one, well they could strengthten the mount of the suspension, I meant if the car is for track work..so won't be potholes

No, but even on dedicated circuits you have ripple strips and other kerbs. And most tracks in Australia aren't dead smooth.

On a street circuit, only a few (at best) are perfectly flat.

And as people have said, ultra stiff does not mean better handling. Its not just drifters use the weight shift that comes with suspension compression to adjust the attitude of the car in and through a bend - racers do it too.

3-its not about sound quality, more to the handling bit, the subs are light but the solid wood box has considerable weight + the level arm from car cetre to rear end of car is larger than level arm to engine. The weight at the back will help with traction, no?

Less weight is still better than more weight with good balance. A stereo isn't a mandatory part of making a car go fast, so pulling it out and relocating stuff you do need (battery, fluid resovoirs, etc) to improve balance is still better than sticking a pair of boxed subs in the boot.

The weight also sits relatively high as well, which increases your centre of gravity.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143430-my-weird-logic/#findComment-2679667
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...