Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

so, for a series 1 1997 rb25det stagea, a R33 same year (ie series 2) heater core will fit, as will a Z32 (300zx 1990-1996) heater core?

just confirming prior to buying one and stocking it 'till ready to do the job

thanks all.

over and out for a few weeks. off to hospy................

cyas

There are actually 2 different part #s for the stagea heater core and 2 for the Series 2 R33, prob slight difference for colder areas, eg bigger core. I would be 99% sure that they are interchangable and the Z32 would be same.

also this link:

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/NISSAN-300ZX,-Z32-N...9QQcmdZViewItem

Edited by chook

For S1 Stagea's R34/R33/R32 ones fit in. I put a secondhand R34 one in because I only paid $100 for it and I thought getting a R34 one it would be less aged. Have fun with the install off it.......................

Also did you read my points in this post above:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...&st=0

hey cy,just had dash back out finialy fixed that dam creak.under it stupid spot wields on the seams,but all fixed now.also the compression is even now must of had carbon build up on that cylinder.thanks for the ride bud.

  • 8 months later...

Hi all,

Well here it goes again... I have replaced my heater core 3 times now... first 2 was second hand heatercores so understandable why i had to replace them in a matter of 2 month but then I bough a brand new one from Nissan that was about 2 years ago and the other day it decided its going to leak... What the hell i thought they are suppose to last for at least 8 years or so not 2... so help would be appreciated as to why on earth a 2 year old heatercore is leaking...

looking forward to your responses guys :)

  • 6 years later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...