Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As i said i experienced this problem after my exhaust install. - vic

set my boost to 10 with manual controller and it will hold 10 till about 5000rpm then creep up to abou 12 by redline. and yes, the solenoid has been removed...

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

what part of the exhaust install was it that this happened? if it was after the dump pipe was installed, i'd say that where the wastegate is opening, the dump pipe is sitting slightly out of place and the wastegate isn't flowing properly.

what part of the exhaust install was it that this happened? if it was after the dump pipe was installed, i'd say that where the wastegate is opening, the dump pipe is sitting slightly out of place and the wastegate isn't flowing properly.

I got everything done at once over two days, turbo back exhaust, cooler etc so i dunno unfortunately.

From experience (both those turbos have been installed on my car) the satandad hole is more than enough to prevent creep.

if yoiu are haning troubles with an RB25 turb on rb25 use an RB20 actuaaor or take off your actuator and elongate the holes or bend the rod to give more preload.

Yup, have seen that fix too, Bass Junky's car. He just bent the thing. Poor response was the actuator not the wastegate.

  • 3 weeks later...

hey sorry to bring up an old thread!

im getting jasma dump pipe and front pipe done in my R33 this friday..

currently its running a 3.5inch catback(not too sure on size but im pretty sure its either 3 or 3.5.. with a 5inch tip with a silencer..

will that cause mine to creep up as well? im running stock boost with just a pod filter. boosts 5/7psi.

Thanks!

you wont really know for sure until you try. It will depend entirely on how high flowing the exhaust is. If your only running stock boost, i wouldnt worry too much about the creep.. will just give you a nice little kick in the high range :glare:

yeah well i installed an R32 actuator, OK in the first 2 gears, creeps maybe 2 psi now vs 5 before, but in 4 th pulled 13.3 psi max, yeeeehhhaaaa.

The R32 actuator is sooo much better in responce to teh stock 7psi one. I love it, but it means that i can't run low boost now, so just a temp sollution for me.

  • 7 months later...

hey guys im also getting boost creep and i have the r32 actuator, with FMIC, POD, DUMP, Down pipe, high flow cat, cat back zorst, running no boost controller.

tho the vacuum fitting im getting to go to the actuator is coming from the manifold and not the hot pipe close to the turbo will this cure it?

also ! will a screamer dump pipe fix the boost creep? as in this being the ultimate high flow wastegate?

if none of these can fix it only thing left is porting the wastegate!!!

any help would be great! thanx

what a crock of shit most of this thread is about external gates for factory turbos, and free flowing exhausts causing overboost etc.

Oh, and I can stand up and speak because I had this problem.

Want to know how I solved it?

I installed and tuned a Powerfc.

Reason:

The Factory ECU runs that shit rich and retarded that it creates heaps of exhaust gas and creeps boost. With my Turbo set at 5psi, it would ALWAYS creep to 10psi. I couldn't stop it, I tried everything.

As soon as I put the powerfc in it stopped. Then I cranked it up to 12.5psi and ran 210rwkw.

The mechanic telling you that you need an external gate is a wanker - he doesn't know what he's talking about, and is only trying to milk you for money.

ahahahah this thread cracked me up.

The R32 actuator is sooo much better in responce to teh stock 7psi one. I love it, but it means that i can't run low boost now, so just a temp sollution for me.

Without trying to offend, but someone that can't control anything other than max boost with their foot, is retarded and shouldn't own a turbo car...

Edited by The Mafia

Ok I have researched this for AGES because I was having some boost cut issues.

Ok I installed an SAFCII and while installing it I notised that the previous owner was a fool and installed a turbo smart fuel cut defender on it which was actually making the ECU go spastic. I removed this and there was no more boost cut, I could run 16psi through it stock ECU and it didn't have a care in the world. It did R&R (Rich and Retard) some times but my experience with R&R was that it only made you lose a little bit of power and it wasn't really that notisable but if I ran 14psi it had more power than at 16psi due to R&R.

I also installed an R32 Actuator and I actually prefer my stock actuator. I have a boost controller but when that isn't connected the car hits about 4.5psi quickly then really struggles to get to 10psi which it hits at abotu 5500rpm. With the stock actuator the car hit 7psi really fast and held that all the way. With my boost controller hocked up the wastegate still opens earler than the stock R33 actuator so my boost builds quicker with the stock one over the R32 actuator.

Also my car boost creaps hard with R33 stock actuator and does the same thing with R32 actuator but just a little less I assume this is because I am getting less power with the R32 actuator due to less boost over the rev range. I have a single muffler 3" system with no restriction, I have a one piece dump pipe so no issues with the wastegate not opening fully, I think I will resolve this by putting a new turbo on it with a bigger internal gate.

stock wastegate spring = 5psi, stock controller = extra 2psi hold... if your actuator was 7psi you would be incapable of getting the "low boost" 5psi without some weird and wonderful configuration with alternate gating etc...

second... if you have boost creep of more than 2psi on stock turbo with stock gate / spring loading then you need to check your boost controller.

no personal experience with the 32 actuator what so ever but in theory from what ive read sounds like it shouldnt be acting that way but id leave that to someones actual experience.

^ i take it this would also apply to any form of fuel/timing management? ie. piggyback.

yeah man, if you can lean the mixtures then you can control this a little better.

BUT just remember its a factor of a lot of things. Removing that extra fuel helps though.

I'm sure advancing the timing a little will help too, but watch for ping!!

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 year later...
I am stuck at this stage... need a PFC.. but they are so rare for RB25s unless you want to pay $1600.

which is what people who pay $900 from Japan before they where discontinued expect you to pay.

I got lucky. I got the PFC and Combo Handheld version bundled onto one box from someone on ebay australia for $1700. It has the PFC ECR33 xxx-xxxx on the model serial number instead of the PFC RB25 xxx-xxxx from most PFC i've seen.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to !
    • As I've said elsewhere, I am using the stock intercooler piping path in the engine bay, and a return flow cooler, and making ~250 rwkW (without any effort put into trying to turn it up past there just yet) and expect to be able to make some more, and frankly, I would be perfectly happy with 260-270rwKW. This is peak road Skyline usability territory. You go past there and, sure, the car will snap necks more when it's on boost, but it will also break shit all the time, cost a (even larger) fortune in tyres, etc etc. Anyway, I also do not like the over-the-fan pipe path, and you don't have to do it.
    • I see, honestly I’m not too fussed about the looks. The only reason to go plenum is to make the piping easier instead of the classic over the rad etc. 
    • Not easy to quantify wrt something like how many fractions of a second slower it would be over 0-100. But given that a 250-300rwkW car is able to do that launch sprint in 5-6 sec (and faster with appropriate tyres, and surface)..... giving up as much as a second would feel like torture. A ~450HP capable turbo is not going to make lots of boost in the 2000-3000 rpm range. So, whilst with some boost on hand it will be faster accelerating in that rev range than your engine currently is NA, it will not feel like a fast car until the boost is solidly in. You know what your car feels like right now when you open it up at 2000rpm. if you've ever been in an actual fast car, you will appreciate that the NARB25 is.... not exciting. Well, add some boost and it will be better. But shorten the intake runners and it might not be better at all. It might come out better, but it could end up feeling the same. For me, it's not the 0-X km/h sprints that matter. It is easy to fry the tyres with anything over 200 rwkW. You can't use all the power available in 1st and 2nd anyway, you have to modulate the throttle. What matters is how the car reacts when you're driving in traffic in 4th or 5th and have maybe 2000 rpm on board, and you want/need to add some speed quickly, and don't have time for the downshift. It won't make boost, it will be all NA (at the speeds we're talking about - remember how fast you're going at 2000 in 4th! and don't plan on breaking the limit by too much.) So giving away NA torque is not what I would consider practical for a street car. And retaining that NA torque builds boost faster which makes the car faster. The flashy plenum is not actually better, unless you're looking at a track car where you can keep it on the boil all the time.  
    • So how much difference does it make you think? Like 1 second in the 0-100?  I was have smaller turbo so hopefully that spools quick GTX2871.  currently it’s NA so you can imagine pretty slow, but I do want fast accusation a little as there’s not many places I’ll be driving where I go over 80 even near me. So 0-60 and 0-80 targets   
×
×
  • Create New...