Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

OK well i just got my car dynoed and here is the result. the mods are front mount intercooler, hks air filter, turbo back exaust with gutted cat, boost controller set to 10psi, SAFC, and a bosch 910 fuel pump,

also as u can see the car was dynoed at RE CUSTOMS and i cannot thank ray enough i recommend anyone wanting a tune or work done to head down there. i know ill be going back when i get a power fc which will hopefully be soon post-14524-1166431184.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/147832-dyno-result-im-happy/
Share on other sites

nice man. nar mine is black i was there on friday aswell and he chucked my car on the dyno and then i got the bad news my fuel pump shit itself so i brought a new 910 and O what a difference and he didnt really need to change my air/fuel somehow it was running great but he used the safc just to make it a bit richer up high end car goes great im so pleased. calder on wednesday should be fun

nice man. nar mine is black i was there on friday aswell and he chucked my car on the dyno and then i got the bad news my fuel pump shit itself so i brought a new 910 and O what a difference and he didnt really need to change my air/fuel somehow it was running great but he used the safc just to make it a bit richer up high end car goes great im so pleased. calder on wednesday should be fun

fantastic - let us know how your car goes on wednesday..... yeah u might have seen my car there on friday (white s2 r33). welsh plugs gave way when they were doing hte service, so had to change all that - now its running great. Gonna get more mods done through them (the exhaust was done thru them)

That is a very high result for a fairly stock car. especially for only 10psi. I think the dyno is being a bit optamistic. Also your power curve is quite wonky in a couple of places. it might have been slipping on the dyno :P

this was mine with only a couple of mods - done at RE as well

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&p=2753467

i could be wrong, but wouldnt the intercooler and the fuel pump increase the power output significantly?

That dyno reading is a joke, my car has the exact same mods and it sure as hell does NOT have 210kw at the wheels.

Somthing is wrong there.

With those mods id expect about 170rwkw.

cheers

your engine might be getting rather tired, or the dyno you went on under read to some extent (170kw is pretty low for those mods) and his over read to some extent.

for those mods i'd say about 190kw would be pretty accurate. remember that he does have a gutted cat.

ahh 170rwkw was just an estimate.

I havnt had my car dynod as yet but i hav those mods and im also putting on a batmbl front/drump pipe soon with a 5" body cat.

Haha pretty sure after i do that my clutch is sure to die a horrible death.

The only reason i didnt think i had that much power because i raced a mates stock 180 running 10 psi and he beat me by 1/2 a car length.

NOTE: race was conducted at appropriate race track

only way to find out if the power is correct is take the car down to the drags and compare the times/terminal(trap) speeds with others car of that power range.

no point comparing dynos.

my 2cents

My understanding behind shootout mode dynos, was to apply a correction so that most dynos could be compared. Now there is nothing wrong with the figures, as the correct mode was used and the air temps look right.

I am puting my money on either it running too lean, or you have a non-stock turbo in it (hi-flow / aftermarket).

Forget the figure, look at the power curve. something not right.

9 psi by 6h km/ph in 4th? looks like the operator held it on load untill he started the run. This is not really and indication on what the car will do on the street and will F96k up the peak torque figure.

Then there is a taper off and then an full 10 rwkw more at redline.

as long as the car holds boost correctly and the AFR's are safe the figure does not matter really. Still I have NEVER seen a car wth this level of mods produce more 190rwkw.

Glad you are happy with the result :(

Cheers!

yeah I have the same bs figure as well, 199rwkw before tune and 211rwkw after tune with a SAFC2. I must have gotten on a happy dyno as well, must get myself to a more moderate one to test out again, coz there's no way I'm gonna believe that. Although its fun bragging to people about it hahahahah

the only accurate way to compare timeslips from the track is to have the same person drive both cars. in a way they are like dyno readouts. 1 person may be a crap driver, but have more power and better tyres, suspension, etc, but still run a slower time at a slower speed than someone who can driver really well.

so i brought a new 910 and O what a difference and he didnt really need to change my air/fuel somehow it was running great but he used the safc just to make it a bit richer up high end

it should already be waaay rich with the new pump and stock ecu... he would have been leaning it out with the SAFC not making it richer

and no point running with a gutted cat unless you have a section of pipe put in there... just creates turbulance otherwise and no power gain

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I thought that might be the case, thats what I'll start saving for. Thanks for the info 
    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
    • My return flow is custom and puts the return behind the reo, instead of at the bottom. All my core is in the air flow, rather than losing some of it up behind the reo. I realise that the core really acts more as a spiky heatsink than as a constant rate heat exchanger, and that therefore size is important.... but mine fits everything I needed and wanted without having to cut anything, and that's worth something too. And there won't be a hot patch of core up behind the reo after every hit, releasing heat back into the intake air.
    • There is a really fun solution to this problem, buy a Haltech (or ECU of your choice) and put the MAF in the bin.  I'm assuming your going to want more power in future, so you'll need to get the ECU at some stage. I'd put the new MAF money towards the new ECU. 
×
×
  • Create New...