Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If the gauge was reading 100lb then the thing wouldn't pull a drunk sailor off your sister. So I would say there is something not quite right with the gauge or the setup for the test. Is the battery fully charged & in good nick?

Did he do a wet test?

Edited by djr81
  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

No he didn't do a wet test and I agree with you, a few other threads have said that if the compression is THAT low the car would be making sfa power and this car was an CRAP load faster than my car and felt tighter through the revs with smooth power all the way. I can only assume the guage/tested was stuffed/stupid but I think it's a reasonable sign that the figures are all pretty close. If the engine is anything ike the rest of the car, it shold be immaculate more or less. Now I have to decide if I want to take the risk =\

Hah, we're talking some serious bucks for the car and I'd hate to buy it only to have it fail on me in some serious way in the near future, I know all engines will eventually wear out etc etc but it's hard when the main thing I wanted from today was some good compression figures and it doesn't seem like I got them, either because the engine is failing or because the tester/guage was stuffed. In my mind the figures do not match the performance given ~128psi is the lowest limit for RB26DETT compression, and that's for a worn/tired engine, this felt to be neither.

4x90 psi and 2x100 psi, not what I would expect from a good engine!

Does your mechanic know what he is doing? Its a bit funny that the numbers are so round, 90 and 100. I must say thats its hard to believe that compression is so low on all of them and the car running so well .

Your mechanic should know that 90psi is very low for any engine, even a 2 stroke engine would have more than that. Even if he never seen a GTR before he should know.

If I was you I would do leakdown test as well, if the compession numbers are correct she will have some leaks either from the top-end or bottom-end but a leakdown test will confirm where its loosing compression from .

It was just at an Ultra Tune in Richmond - I'm in Wodonga bout 3hrs away. I had my GTS25T inspected at a different Ultra Tune (Coburg) and it didn't get more than 120 across any cylinder and has been an excellent car in the time I've owned it, no oil usage no blow by no smoke etc. Maybe Ultra Tune just suck or have crap gear =\ What's a leakdown test worth and where's a good place to get one done in or around Mt Waverly?

I've spoken to a few mechanics now regarding this and everyone says that if it was making those figures it would not even run properly let alone make the power I felt when I drove it. I think we can safely say the tester/equipment is not 100%.

What's a leakdown test cost and where's a good place to get one near Mt Waverly?

Edited by ActionDan

Spoke with the tester and explained what figures the car should have got and so forth, he's convinced his tester is busted and he noted 'If that's what a worn RB26DETT feels like then a new one must be like a boeing 747, it's simply too smooth and too strong to be a worn out engine. I'll calibrate my tester" etc etc.

That sounds like what I was thinking myself.

Mate if you wanta professional to check your car out go to see Geoff Nicholls @ Prestige in Glenferrie. He has looked at all of the cars i have purchased and a send all my friends to him also. He charges you a decent price and knows everything back to front.

His number is 9818 4555

I've spoken to a few mechanics now regarding this and everyone says that if it was making those figures it would not even run properly let alone make the power I felt when I drove it. I think we can safely say the tester/equipment is not 100%.
What's a leakdown test cost and where's a good place to get one near Mt Waverly?

No idea , sorry mate I'm in Sydney, I wouln't use this mob again though.

O.K the numbers are low but also the variance is a little on the big side , they should be a lot closer , again I don't think you can trust those numbers .

A leakdown test involves pumping compressed air in the cylinders via the tester itself and it will give you a% of lost pressure, anything under 5% is good .

Smart guy aren't ya. So why don't you tell me how pod filters are better than an enclosed factory airbox on a street car? You'd know right because you've tested back to back right.... right.

Well, I've tested back to back. Was not a high-powered GTR by any means (250awkw at the time).

Made a difference. No dyno graphs, sorry.

This of course is probably because the stock box has an inlet area of about 60cm2 compared with about 120cm2

for the pod; and a filter area of about 375cm2 vs maybe 1000cm2 for the pod. I had a stock panel, then a (better)

K&N panel in the stock airbox, then a (best so far) K&N pod.

The pod is in the front LHS guard so intake temps should be down if anything compared to the stock snorkel.

Of course, most pod 'kits' that replace the stock airbox and leave the pods right where the box was don't have such

an increase in intake or filtration areas; and sucking hotter air in is always going to be a disadvantage. Some of the

foam ones going around look downright dangerous to me (the foam seems to degrade real fast, leaving holes

and leaving me wondering where those bits of foam actually went).

I just don't think that 'pods are no better than a factory airbox on a street car' is accurate. Maybe 'typical pod

kits that replace the stock airbox won't be much better than the factory airbox'?

Regards,

Saliya

Edited by saliya

2nd comp test was done this morning at another mechanic, car rated between 145 and 148 across all six standard dry test. Mechanic rates the car as being in excellent condition all round.

I'm gonna buy it =D

Any more info on those rebuilt turbo's from Slide?

Run an oil analysis, it will tell you what wear is occuring.

Dan, that sounds a bit better, but do none of these "mechanics" know how to do a "wet" compression test or are they all just slack?

Don't have the Sliders yet, and they won't go on until all the bits arrive, but word is they will get you all teh chicks :teehee:

I thought wet was only done if there was reason for concern? If not then I'd say they;'re slack. I'm buying the car so we'll know soon enough how healthy it is =D

What does he rebuild them to? steel wheel, ball bearing? what power are they good for etc. for $1400 I couldn't see them being ballbearing?

Why bother with a dry test if it only takes a moment extra to do them wet?

Steel wheels and bush bearing, just a centre cartridge and the housings are machined. Stock 32/33 are bush and since mine isn't intended to be a full race car and I always take the time to come in steady, I don't really see the need, I have a race car for the expensive work.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...