Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

post-26406-1166983334.gif

Came across this why doing some research for my turbo upgrade.

http://www.hks-power.co.jp/products/turbo/...1rkai_graph.gif

BNR34

2.8L Bottom End

HKS T51R Kai BB

In Cam 290

Ex Cam 280

2 bar boost

150kw @ 3000rpm

450kw @ 4000rpm

660kw @ 6500rpm

That looks pretty impressive to me. What do you guys think? Could this be off an engine dyno not a chassis dyno?

Anyone have much experience with the Kai? They seem fairly popular in the Uk.

Merry Christmas

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/148634-t51-kai-dyno/
Share on other sites

post-26406-1166983334.gif

Came across this why doing some research for my turbo upgrade.

http://www.hks-power.co.jp/products/turbo/...1rkai_graph.gif

BNR34

2.8L Bottom End

HKS T51R Kai BB

In Cam 290

Ex Cam 280

2 bar boost

150kw @ 3000rpm

450kw @ 4000rpm

660kw @ 6500rpm

That looks pretty impressive to me. What do you guys think? Could this be off an engine dyno not a chassis dyno?

Anyone have much experience with the Kai? They seem fairly popular in the Uk.

Merry Christmas

Yep, no problems - especially when you say it all quickly (i.e. full HKS 2.8L kit, STEP PRO cams and valve train to suit, FCON V, etc.).

Other "minor/incidentals" such as intercooler, plenum, injectors, fuel system, exhaust manifold, wastegate, full exhaust system, flywheel, multiplate clutch, upgraded gearbox etc are of course, a given.

How does the old saying go? "Speed is money - how fast do you want to go?"

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/148634-t51-kai-dyno/#findComment-2773203
Share on other sites

I would say it is definately RWKW or AWKW, but wouldn't expect thet sort of midrange, however i dont really think its a real dynograph.

But if it is real mighty good result dont ya say..

money=speed.....how true

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/148634-t51-kai-dyno/#findComment-2773215
Share on other sites

yeah it's a given that there have been plenty of bucks spent, its possible it was a HKS test car, so nothing has been left out.

But even so there are plenty of cars that have had ALOT of dollars spent on them in Oz but i've yet to see one with that sort of performance.

After thinking about even if that was an engine dyno and not a chassis dyno it is still every impressive.

To be honest i didnt think to would be possible to have 650kw at the top end with such a good mid range. I mean if that graph was a true indication of that engines performance you could set the rev limit for 4000 rpm for street driving and just open it up for drags.

I have had TO4Z at the top of my shopping list but after seeing this kai (if it could some how be confirmed) it goes to the top. It would be nice if HKS had a graph for the TO4Z on there site to compare, but i'd have to think the kai out performs it in every way.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/148634-t51-kai-dyno/#findComment-2773690
Share on other sites

"...Yep, no problems - especially when you say it all quickly ...."

:D couldnt agree more...Gav you left out N1 or GT block, Mechanical LSDs front and back++++

Hey P.E. Dont believe everything you read from the component suppliers...not everyone dynos on a DD in shootout mode...oh and Merry Christmas

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/148634-t51-kai-dyno/#findComment-2773710
Share on other sites

:P

:D couldnt agree more...Gav you left out N1 or GT block, Mechanical LSDs front and back++++

Hey P.E. Dont believe everything you read from the component suppliers...not everyone dynos on a DD in shootout mode...oh and Merry Christmas

Hmm, the front and rear mechanical LSDs i already have made absolutely no difference to my turbo spool. I must have got the wrong brand!!!

agreed, don't believe every dyno from component suppliers, but i think everyone would agree that HKS under rate must of there gear on paper so why would they over rate componets on a dyno?

There other dyno charts on they're web site that look about right.

Even if it was out by 10%, still impressive.

Anyone have any useful feed back?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/148634-t51-kai-dyno/#findComment-2773755
Share on other sites

I agree. Does anyone have anymore info on this particular car?

The owner of the car is on the forums quite frequently and ill show him this thread as well :nyaanyaa:

It is a very tough car though and isnt just a show pony, its quite often out and about in Canberra :laugh:

P.S: It also makes a fair whack more than 500kw now in its every day street tune on pump fuel

Edited by Amaru
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/148634-t51-kai-dyno/#findComment-2775307
Share on other sites

My mechanic just bought one of the T51R SPL turbo's.. it's bloody huge! It's going on a 26 stroker, I'll get him to post results once it's built :P

Off the top of my head I think the T51R KAI is an 800hp turbo and the SPL is good for 1000hp O_o

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/148634-t51-kai-dyno/#findComment-2775967
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes I can see how that would put you off HFM, especially with the price of good quality brake fluid. From what I understand it as you say the BM50 is the standard BMC for a R32 GTR, I must admit I would like to go far a Genuine Nissan BM57, but lack of cash prevents that at present. With the price being so close between the genuine BM50 and BM57 a BM57 New it seems a better choice as you gain that 1/16 bore size with the BM57, I would be interested in how much difference you feel with the BM57 fitted. I am going to take SteveL's advice in the short term and see how much actually comes out of that proportioning valve vent and save up for the Genuine Nissan part. Thanks for clarifying the HFM failure
    • Thanks mate. I just got the post inspection 1/2 done from state roads when the starter motor packed up, either that or the car alarm system is having trouble.  OEM part number 23300-AA112.
    • Hi, I though I was coming to an end in finding a replacement starter motor for a rb25de neo. I came across a starter motor from Taarks and a message below stating: Direct fit. 11 Tooth count. All below part numbers have been superseded to 11 teeth. Can some body shed some light on going from 8 teeth to 11 teeth apart from 36-month / 25,000 km warranty for passenger vehicles to 12 Month Warranty. Compatible with the following Nissan part numbers: 23300-20P00 23300-20P01 23300-20P05 23300-20P10 23300-20P11 23300-AA111 23300-AA112 23300-AA300 23300-08U10 23300-08U11 23300-08U15  
    • Low battery? Maybe check capacity? I know first-hand, on BMWs if your battery drops below 80% capacity, it starts causing strange issues.
    • 8.5 +37 = should fit rear, but I think it'll hit on front. What you want is low 30s/high 20's front, mid 30's rear. That 17" screenshot you posted looks good, I'd run it on my R32 (but that's long dead now). For tyre sizes, my rule of thumb is: 8': 235, 9": 255. But that's just my opinion. Nismo sizes: 18x8.5+35/18x9.5+38 is a good starting point.
×
×
  • Create New...