Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i have just found out that theres two types of q45 afm one will measure upto 400bhp and the other beyond that what i'm trying to find out is exactly how they differ inside is it a chip for reading the voltage and outputting it to the ecu or is it just a simple case of changing a few resistors to up it's capacitity.

cheers for any help help guys

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/149044-q45-differences/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Actually this is partly down to me ;)

My q45 has u00 p60 in the serial number (same as pommeys) and maxes out (5.1v on the pfc) at 3/4 throttle around 70mph/3000rpm.

Thats running a 3037pro s on an RB25, unmapped and a guesstimated 300bhp at the wheels.

A friend has a Q45 with u01 p61 in the serial number and has no such problems with his 336bhp at the hubs.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/149044-q45-differences/#findComment-2779845
Share on other sites

I have both a u00 p60 and a u00 p61.

Apart from the obvious fact that the later is from a later model car and newer the other difference is the plugs are slightly different.

If the car is untuned then is the AFM selected as the 90mm in the Power FC options even?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/149044-q45-differences/#findComment-2779855
Share on other sites

I'll find out what the numbers on mine are to compare. Someone send me whatever the OTHER numbered one is, i'll wire it in and we'll have definitive proof.

And I want to run 20psi not 15psi like it is right now :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/149044-q45-differences/#findComment-2780556
Share on other sites

I couldnt get over half a bar of boost (8psi) without it maxxing :P

I've checked, double checked and rechecked all the wiring and PFC settings and everything was plumbed in as it should be.

Unforunately im not in a position to swap AFM's around on my car as its sat in a garage with the engine in a dozen pieces awaiting a 4th rebuild (some "tuners" should be shot) but it would be nice to have an answer to this for when she goes back on the road.

22680 61u00 a36-000 p60 - This is what I have on mine

22680 61u01 a36-000 p61 - This is the other one on a friends car

Edited by Gambit
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/149044-q45-differences/#findComment-2780589
Share on other sites

running out of load points is tunable

maxing the afm at 5.1v is not

if you are running out of load points (ie: it drops to row 20) then its tuneable and fixable with datalogit or power excel or fc pro

if you are maxing the afm at 5.1v some time early (like 3 grand etc) then something is horribly wrong. the afm is shagged, wrong unit, its dirty, bad earth or something? for those that have this problem at idle what voltage do you see? what version of powerfc? (ETC, VERSION)

if you give it a few revs at idle does it return to the same voltage each time?

the numbers in the voltage ramp which are visible in datalogit, fc pro and power excel only control how it is placed on the load map, that is it wont control when it hits 5.1v but more determine where certain voltages hit the load axis.

the numbers under SETTING, AIRFLOW control correction for load map placement, thse shift the final load axis up or down once it is calculated. again it wont affect voltage readings

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/149044-q45-differences/#findComment-2780783
Share on other sites

for curious sake the FC runs in this order

1) read AFM voltage (in volts, 0.00 to 5.10v)

2) look at SETTING, AIRFLOW (work out what AFM is selected) - (normal, powerintake, vg30, vh41 etc)

3) select "airflow" value from airflow ramp table for the corresponding AFM (this is a load number, ie: 5533 is an airflow "load" number)

4) apply AIRFLOW correction (from SETTING, AIRFLOW, NEXT) - (this is in % for AFM voltage scales, there are 8 of them i think)

5) with the final answer from #4 select INJ and IGN from maps where LOAD = P and RPM axis = RPM

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/149044-q45-differences/#findComment-2780811
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...