Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys

Happy new year to all

before chrisy i installed my poncams and got a tune expecting a nice fat midrange with a strong top end as the cams are designed to do. yet i was missing 50 kws from my previous tune with the standard cams.

we got the pfc boost kit working well with a fairly constant 24 psi, but the dam thing just wouldnt make any power.

i dont have a printout of the run, but it was making slightly more power down low then up past 4500 the old graph left it for dead.

previous graph with gizzmo boost controller was 317 kws

new tune with poncams and pfc ebc is around 270 kws

gizmo tune was 26psi droping to 24 psi at redline

pfc ebc was constant 24 psi to redline

also the power was dropping off slightly past 7k whle with the standard cams it was still pulling hard at 7300

"ITS NOT THE CAM TIMING"

i have checked, spun the motor and re checked.

Just a thought.

What have i changed between the old cam tune and the new tune?

Poncams

new 4 inch stainless intake from q45 to turbo

PFC ebc

Full Auto trans build by MV auto with a 3k high stall.

So i wonder what difference the built trans is having on the dyno?

Whos got a crystal ball thats works?

Cheers

Darren

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/149251-rb25-poncam-issue-missing-80kws/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

maybe the tuner hasnt changed the maps enough?

is the comp setup for the q45?

what is the airfuel doing on the graph where it dies down to 270kw?

Old tune had the q45 on it, i have just changed from a 4 inch silicone elbow to a 4 inch stainless elbow.

AFR over 4k its 12 dropping down to 11.5 at 7300rpm

no i havent used a dial gauge, just set them both at zero.

i had the head apart when i did my full rebuild and all the standard springs where measured and were all in top nick. as the car from new hasnt done 50k yet.

so i was thinking it wasnt the springs as the cams are designed for the standard valve train.

From what i have seen, high stalls dont work well with dyno's, dynod many cars with them, and they never seem to make the power they should. I dynod an XD recently which made heaps of noise, and only 260 rwkw, but that night ran an 11? Does the car feel noticeably slower in the top end? 80kw should be very noticable in the seat of the pants dyno?Should make more power down low, as thats the torque multiplication doing its job.

Same dyno yeah?

yea same dyno

we overlapped the old tune and the new one but i didnt get a copy of it.

new tune started off better then crossed the old tune about 4k ish then followed it up to redline but slowly lacking more and more power.

old tune with standard cams

post-24852-1167536973.jpg

The cams 'will' require adjustment and when you do adjust them you need to alter timing and fuel maps to suit. The timing map you had of the stock cams will not work well at all for example if applied to the new ones.

You 'must' invest in adjustable cam gears if you have not already, at least on the exhaust side.

The cams will increase the engines airflow capacity without question if setup correctly, that is the good news.

The cams 'will' require adjustment and when you do adjust them you need to alter timing and fuel maps to suit. The timing map you had of the stock cams will not work well at all for example if applied to the new ones.

You 'must' invest in adjustable cam gears if you have not already, at least on the exhaust side.

The cams will increase the engines airflow capacity without question if setup correctly, that is the good news.

SK reckon's they are best set at standard?

but having adjutment will be handy so i will aquire one.

"The cams will increase the engines airflow capacity without question if setup correctly,

that is the good news"

was there bad news coming?

I think if you ask SK, he's going to tell you the same thing. His comment reffered to a particular cars setup ,one totally different to yours. It was a Neo motor for a start. Even if I owned a neo engine I certainly wouldn't assume that 0 and 0 are right for an application where turbo selection and high stalls are involved. Engine loads on the new stall will play a part in changing the game.

Always explore cam timing changes no matter what engine, you can do so much to the power delivery by altering it.

Having said that if you didn't alter the timing map significantly for the new cams then there is no question you have a massive issue right there. It is critical to good power with the larger duration,lift and overlap cams you have especially up top in the rpm.

My guess is you are going to end up with quite a bit of adjustment on the cam timing given the airflow target is above 300rwkw.

I'd expect to see as much as 100hp+ peak power or so improvement over the stock units at the same boost once they are setup right.

Darren,

The converter aside how smooth is the top end of the graph?

Nice and smooth? I've noticed as valve float occurs that's not really noticeable (i.e pumping up lifters or massive nose overs) the graph tends to start to wobble up and down slightly away from the usual smooth curve and as you dial in more boost power doesn't pick up as it should.

The valve springs may appear in top shape but for the boost you are running they will be nearing the limit.

Some with rb25 heads begin to float at around 20psi others have no issues up to 25psi. It 'may' be possible the cams have a slightly more aggressive ramp rate that pushes the springs just over the edge *slightly*. Enough so that it just won't make any more power even if you dial more boost in.

Pushing more and more boost in will have power nose over hard and it will pump the lifters up.

Its going to be a pain in the arse to diagnose as it a few changes have been done at once. :)

Hows it go if you dial in less boost? Big power drops or?

270rwkw through an auto.. I'd expect that to be done on around 17-18psi behind an auto.

I think 32's you have to dial in some degrees, R33's are best on std, R34's I don't know thats on a gtst, gtrs are different again..

My R33 is on 0 degree's and works fine. It was originally set at -4 degrees and I lost 30rwkw, reset to 0 and found them again.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have been being VERY quiet about what you're alluding to, as it is something that ticks me off... The number of cars from factory that run coil overs is HUGE! Most of them these days do... The other part that annoys me, is people saying "Well all the incabin adjustable suspension is illegal by blah blah blah"... If that's the case, then why can I buy a car brand new that can do it if, FULL STOP in cabin adjustable suspension is illegal...   Also, I could just chuck some aftermarket shocks in my car, throw the stock springs on, after my blue slip, dump my super low springs back in. Same shock and spring style setup... Hell, they could also be the same colour springs etc.     I'm voting, BlueSlipper didn't want to touch the above car for some reason. Whether it be some sort of bias against the car, the owner, them maybe having previously done dodgy shit and now they're being super careful in case they get slapped in the face by the Gumbyment again... Find a new blueslip place.   And can confirm as you had said, yes there are holy bibles of vehicle heights, and all sorts of other suspension stuff. Heck your run of the mill mechanic, and tyre shop has access to all of that stuff. It's how they do wheel alignments...
    • Funny story Heading to Sydney this morning on the HWY there was some slow traffic, so I gave it the beans and midway through my overtaking "power run" I lost all power It seems that I missed a hose clamp,  and the MAF and filter went WiFi To make this more problematic, the little tool kit that lives in the boot, is sitting in the sun room at Goulburn......LOL Luckily for me I found a bit of steel on the side of the road that could be used like a rusty and bent flat head screw driver to tighten it up enough that it got me into Sydney, it is now all tight like a tiger with the aid of a 8mm socket Note to self: Use my brain and double check stuff, and always keep that little tool kit in the car for when I have a brain fart
    • Oh, and as for everyone with their fuel economy changes, I switch between E10 and 98 in the company car. Even do when I had personal cars that could run on E10. You know what changed my fuel economy in any noticeable way? How I drove, and where I drove. Otherwise, say on full tanks of just back and forth from work only (So same trips, same sort of traffic), couldn't notice a difference that I can correlate to the type of fuel in use. In the current vehicle, that's over 42L of USABLE fuel. While 98 is all "more energy dense", it also has higher knock resistance as it takes more energy to get it to ignite too. The longer hydrocarbons, typically more tightly bound. So running the same ignition map, can also produce less power, if there isn't enough time to get it all burnt through properly, as yep, the flame propagation speed is different from lower octane fuel to higher (Higher has a lower flame propagation, due to the more tightly bound and harder to self ignite funs. This is also typically where, a vehicle that is designed purely to run on 91 (Whether it be E10 or normal 91) usually sees absolutely no real world difference in fuel economy for the normal man, woman, or dog.
    • We've got some servos around me that have 91 with E10, 91 (no E10), 95, and 98. At those stations the change from 91 E10 to 91, is typically around 8c/L.   But lets not get started on the price of fuel in Oz. It's ridiculous. All the service stations around me, bar one, the price of fuel has been over the $2 mark per litre for the cheapest, 98 being around $2.45. That one service station is a CostCo, fuel from it comes from the same refineries, and makes no pitstops, it runs great, including the 98. In fact, I've had no issues on CostCo fuel, but plenty of issues at other stations!. The CostCo fuel, was $1.65 roughly this week for 94 with E10. $1.88 for 98. Servos directly across from it, $2.10 for 91 E10, and $2.48 for 98. The part I had to laugh at? If I drive multiple HOURS away from Brisbane, say out near Nanango, or Kingaroy, or even out to Goondiwindi, the price of their fuel, is the same as what it is at the CostCo... Oh, and that BP servo at Goondiwindi is HUGE and goes through epic turnover of fuel, so it's not sitting there for weeks going to shit. And what blows me away, my mate is one of the people who drives the Fuel Tanker all around QLD, delivering to all those places. At the same company his previous role was doing the "local haul" deliveries... Same truck, same driver, same pickup point it all comes from. So you tell me, how the hell it is 60c/L CHEAPER for fuel, when nearly all else is equal, except they require a B-Double to drive half a day out of Brisbane, and half a day back, every second day, compared to the delivery that can be under 30 minutes drive from the fuel pickup point... Not to mention, go five blocks down the road, and Ampol to Ampol will vary 30c/L... And I've had this conversation with my mate... The way it's priced, is just typical, pure and utter rubbish... He also does runs from Brisbane, to all over QLD, down to Newcastle, Sydney, Nowra, Melbourne, Geelong, and even out to parts of the NT depending on the companies needs. His main stuff is all the longer distance away from home for a few days at a time, then when he's back, he loves to just pickup extra shifts wherever he can in whichever truck, hence all the weird different places.   Oh, as for getting E10 into all the fuels in Australia... It was very quickly highlighted, that we don't have enough biomass available to use to make E10 sustainably like they require, and it would dramatically cut into our, and the worlds food chain supply...   I vote we all just start running on liquid methane gas... Plenty of that just getting tapped off at tips from underground decay... (Note, this is pure just stupid commenting. I could very easily highlight the reasons its not a good idea especially on scale...)
    • Am I correct in assuming that the R35's are getting the classic skyline haircut off the odometer?  Quick search on carsales, there are 33 08 and 09 GTR's for sale, only 2 of them have more then 100,000km's on them (116,075 and 110,000 respectively).  And somehow there are about 25 for sale with around 60,000kms? Looks like the classic skyline haircut to me =/
×
×
  • Create New...